Tumor Marker Index Based on CEA and CA19-9 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Resectable Colon Cancer.

Tatsufumi Kosuge, Junichi Mazaki, Kenta Kasahara, Hiroaki Osakabe, Hiroshi Kuwabara, Kenichi Iwasaki, Junya Oguma, Hiroyuki Koga, Akishige Kanazawa, Yuichi Nagakawa
{"title":"Tumor Marker Index Based on CEA and CA19-9 as a Prognostic Biomarker in Resectable Colon Cancer.","authors":"Tatsufumi Kosuge, Junichi Mazaki, Kenta Kasahara, Hiroaki Osakabe, Hiroshi Kuwabara, Kenichi Iwasaki, Junya Oguma, Hiroyuki Koga, Akishige Kanazawa, Yuichi Nagakawa","doi":"10.21873/cdp.10572","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Despite curative resection, the prognosis after surgery for colon cancer varies considerably even among patients within the same TNM stage. There is a need for reliable biomarkers to complement the TNM classification. In pancreatic cancer, tumor markers have been reported as indicators of biological resectability. We therefore focused on tumor markers in colon cancer and investigated the prognostic significance of the tumor marker index (TMI).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed patients with colon cancer (cecum to rectosigmoid) who underwent curative resection at our institution between 2011 and 2023. Among them, 361 patients without missing clinical or laboratory data were included. TMI was defined as the product of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels. Patients were stratified into low- and high-TMI groups based on cutoff values determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with recurrence as the outcome. Three-year recurrence-free survival (3y-RFS), local recurrence-free survival (3y-LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (3y-DMFS) were compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal TMI cutoff value was 64, with 226 cases classified into the low-TMI group and 135 cases into the high-TMI group. The 3y-RFS rate was significantly higher in the low-TMI group than in the high-TMI group (94.0% <i>vs</i>. 88.4%, <i>p</i>=0.023). Similarly, the 3y-LRFS rate was significantly better in the low-TMI group (97.7% <i>vs</i>. 95.2%, <i>p</i>=0.044). In contrast, there was no significant difference in 3y-DMFS between the low- and high-TMI groups (95.4% <i>vs</i>. 91.4%, <i>p</i>=0.103).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TMI was associated with postoperative recurrence patterns in curatively resected colon cancer. TMI may serve as a simple and clinically useful biomarker to complement TNM staging and improve risk stratification after curative surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":72510,"journal":{"name":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","volume":"6 4","pages":"723-728"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13322038/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10572","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Despite curative resection, the prognosis after surgery for colon cancer varies considerably even among patients within the same TNM stage. There is a need for reliable biomarkers to complement the TNM classification. In pancreatic cancer, tumor markers have been reported as indicators of biological resectability. We therefore focused on tumor markers in colon cancer and investigated the prognostic significance of the tumor marker index (TMI).

Patients and methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with colon cancer (cecum to rectosigmoid) who underwent curative resection at our institution between 2011 and 2023. Among them, 361 patients without missing clinical or laboratory data were included. TMI was defined as the product of preoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels. Patients were stratified into low- and high-TMI groups based on cutoff values determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis with recurrence as the outcome. Three-year recurrence-free survival (3y-RFS), local recurrence-free survival (3y-LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (3y-DMFS) were compared between groups.

Results: The optimal TMI cutoff value was 64, with 226 cases classified into the low-TMI group and 135 cases into the high-TMI group. The 3y-RFS rate was significantly higher in the low-TMI group than in the high-TMI group (94.0% vs. 88.4%, p=0.023). Similarly, the 3y-LRFS rate was significantly better in the low-TMI group (97.7% vs. 95.2%, p=0.044). In contrast, there was no significant difference in 3y-DMFS between the low- and high-TMI groups (95.4% vs. 91.4%, p=0.103).

Conclusion: TMI was associated with postoperative recurrence patterns in curatively resected colon cancer. TMI may serve as a simple and clinically useful biomarker to complement TNM staging and improve risk stratification after curative surgery.

基于CEA和CA19-9的肿瘤标志物指数作为可切除结肠癌的预后生物标志物。
背景/目的:尽管进行了根治性切除,但即使在同一TNM阶段的患者中,结肠癌手术后的预后也有很大差异。需要可靠的生物标志物来补充TNM分类。在胰腺癌中,肿瘤标志物已被报道为生物可切除性的指标。因此,我们将重点放在结肠癌的肿瘤标志物上,并研究肿瘤标志物指数(TMI)的预后意义。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了2011年至2023年间在我院接受根治性切除术的结肠癌(盲肠至乙状结肠)患者。其中纳入临床或实验室资料无遗漏的患者361例。TMI定义为术前血清癌胚抗原(CEA)和碳水化合物抗原19-9 (CA19-9)水平的乘积。根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定的临界值将患者分为低tmi组和高tmi组,以复发为结局。比较3年无复发生存期(3y-RFS)、局部无复发生存期(3y-LRFS)和远处无转移生存期(3y-DMFS)。结果:TMI最佳临界值为64,低TMI组226例,高TMI组135例。低tmi组的3y-RFS率显著高于高tmi组(94.0%比88.4%,p=0.023)。同样,低tmi组的3y-LRFS率明显更好(97.7%比95.2%,p=0.044)。相比之下,低tmi组和高tmi组的3y-DMFS无显著差异(95.4%比91.4%,p=0.103)。结论:TMI与治愈性结肠癌术后复发模式有关。TMI可作为一种简单、临床有用的生物标志物,补充TNM分期,改善根治性手术后的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书