Comparison of Automated Urinalysis Parameter Atyp.C and Urine Cytology for Detecting Bladder Carcinoma In Situ.

Ryu Shigehisa, Satoshi Fukata, Keisuke Sugimoto, Shiori Miyazaki, Shinji Tokuhiro, Anantya Pustimbara, Chiaki Kawada, Rie Yoshimura, Keisuke Mizutani, Daigo Takemori, Yuhei Shiba, Shinkuro Yamamoto, Hiroto Osakabe, Tomoya Nao, Tsutomu Shimamoto, Hideo Fukuhara, Nobutaka Shimizu, Shingo Ashida, Keiji Inoue
{"title":"Comparison of Automated Urinalysis Parameter Atyp.C and Urine Cytology for Detecting Bladder Carcinoma <i>In Situ</i>.","authors":"Ryu Shigehisa, Satoshi Fukata, Keisuke Sugimoto, Shiori Miyazaki, Shinji Tokuhiro, Anantya Pustimbara, Chiaki Kawada, Rie Yoshimura, Keisuke Mizutani, Daigo Takemori, Yuhei Shiba, Shinkuro Yamamoto, Hiroto Osakabe, Tomoya Nao, Tsutomu Shimamoto, Hideo Fukuhara, Nobutaka Shimizu, Shingo Ashida, Keiji Inoue","doi":"10.21873/cdp.10571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Urine cytology is a standard non-invasive test for detecting atypical urothelial cells in bladder cancer, although its sensitivity remains limited. While Atyp.C reflects cytological atypia and may aid in detecting urothelial malignancy, its diagnostic performance in bladder carcinoma <i>in situ</i> (CIS) has not been specifically evaluated.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed patients with pathologically confirmed bladder CIS treated from January 2022 to July 2025. The diagnostic sensitivities of urine cytology and Atyp.C were compared, and the performance of their combination was assessed using exact McNemar tests and paired bootstrap analyses. Additional analyses were performed for pure CIS, primary bladder cancer, and recurrent bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study included 61 patients. The overall sensitivity was 77% for urine cytology and 73.8% for Atyp.C, with only a small difference and bootstrap confidence intervals crossing zero. Combined testing showed a higher sensitivity (85.2%), but this increase was not statistically significant. Similar diagnostic performance and no significant incremental benefit were observed across the additional analyses.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Atyp.C demonstrated diagnostic sensitivity comparable to urine cytology for the detection of bladder CIS. As an automated and cost-neutral parameter, Atyp.C may be a useful complementary indicator in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":72510,"journal":{"name":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","volume":"6 4","pages":"715-722"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13321950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Urine cytology is a standard non-invasive test for detecting atypical urothelial cells in bladder cancer, although its sensitivity remains limited. While Atyp.C reflects cytological atypia and may aid in detecting urothelial malignancy, its diagnostic performance in bladder carcinoma in situ (CIS) has not been specifically evaluated.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients with pathologically confirmed bladder CIS treated from January 2022 to July 2025. The diagnostic sensitivities of urine cytology and Atyp.C were compared, and the performance of their combination was assessed using exact McNemar tests and paired bootstrap analyses. Additional analyses were performed for pure CIS, primary bladder cancer, and recurrent bladder cancer.

Results: This study included 61 patients. The overall sensitivity was 77% for urine cytology and 73.8% for Atyp.C, with only a small difference and bootstrap confidence intervals crossing zero. Combined testing showed a higher sensitivity (85.2%), but this increase was not statistically significant. Similar diagnostic performance and no significant incremental benefit were observed across the additional analyses.

Conclusion: Atyp.C demonstrated diagnostic sensitivity comparable to urine cytology for the detection of bladder CIS. As an automated and cost-neutral parameter, Atyp.C may be a useful complementary indicator in routine clinical practice.

自动尿液分析参数c型与尿细胞学检测原位膀胱癌的比较。
背景/目的:尿细胞学检查是检测膀胱癌非典型尿路上皮细胞的标准非侵入性检查,但其敏感性仍然有限。虽然异型c反映了细胞学上的非典型性,并可能有助于检测尿路上皮恶性肿瘤,但其在膀胱原位癌(CIS)中的诊断性能尚未得到专门的评估。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了2022年1月至2025年7月期间病理证实的膀胱CIS患者。比较尿细胞学和异型型c的诊断敏感性,并使用精确McNemar测试和配对bootstrap分析评估其组合的性能。对纯CIS、原发性膀胱癌和复发性膀胱癌进行了进一步的分析。结果:本研究纳入61例患者。尿细胞学的总体敏感性为77%,type . c的总体敏感性为73.8%,只有很小的差异,bootstrap置信区间跨越零。联合检测显示灵敏度更高(85.2%),但这种增加没有统计学意义。在其他分析中观察到类似的诊断性能和没有显著的增量益处。结论:c型对膀胱CIS的诊断敏感性与尿细胞学相当。type . c作为一种自动化且成本中性的参数,在常规临床实践中可能是一种有用的补充指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书