Preoperative physiotherapy and one-year patient-reported outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty: a registry-based cohort study of 1,688 patients.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Siri B Winther, Mani Izadi, Vigdis K S Husby, Otto S Husby, Mathias F Brobakken, Frank-David Øhrn, Jomar Klaksvik, Eivind Wang, Ole Kristian Berg
{"title":"Preoperative physiotherapy and one-year patient-reported outcomes after primary total knee arthroplasty: a registry-based cohort study of 1,688 patients.","authors":"Siri B Winther, Mani Izadi, Vigdis K S Husby, Otto S Husby, Mathias F Brobakken, Frank-David Øhrn, Jomar Klaksvik, Eivind Wang, Ole Kristian Berg","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v58.44853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Preoperative physiotherapy in patients receiving primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to relieve pain, delay surgery, and improve postoperative recovery. This study investigates the change in PROMs and pain after primary TKA between patients who received preoperative physiotherapy (P) and those who did not (NP).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Registry-based cohort study with data from an institutional registry.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>1,688 patients followed a standardized fast-track clinical pathway between August 2017 and January 2024 and were grouped in P or NP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Primary outcome was KOOS-PS at 2 months and 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain, the Forgotten Joint Score, and EQ-5d-5L. Two anchor questions related to self-perceived knee function and willingness to have the surgery again at 12 months' follow-up were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model estimate demonstrated no significant between-group difference in KOOS-PS at 2 months (1.12 points; p = 0.079) or 1-year follow-up (1.25 points; p = 0.097). Visual inspection of descriptive plots showed that NP patients had higher KOOS-PS, less pain, and better joint score and quality of life at all time points. At 12 months' follow-up, both groups had similar responses to the anchor questions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>After adjustment for baseline differences, no between-group differences in postoperative self-reported physical function were observed; consistently lower scores in the physiotherapy group may reflect systematic preoperative differences between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"58 ","pages":"jrm44853"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13334783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.44853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Preoperative physiotherapy in patients receiving primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to relieve pain, delay surgery, and improve postoperative recovery. This study investigates the change in PROMs and pain after primary TKA between patients who received preoperative physiotherapy (P) and those who did not (NP).

Design: Registry-based cohort study with data from an institutional registry.

Patients: 1,688 patients followed a standardized fast-track clinical pathway between August 2017 and January 2024 and were grouped in P or NP.

Methods: Primary outcome was KOOS-PS at 2 months and 1 year postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included pain, the Forgotten Joint Score, and EQ-5d-5L. Two anchor questions related to self-perceived knee function and willingness to have the surgery again at 12 months' follow-up were also evaluated.

Results: The model estimate demonstrated no significant between-group difference in KOOS-PS at 2 months (1.12 points; p = 0.079) or 1-year follow-up (1.25 points; p = 0.097). Visual inspection of descriptive plots showed that NP patients had higher KOOS-PS, less pain, and better joint score and quality of life at all time points. At 12 months' follow-up, both groups had similar responses to the anchor questions.

Conclusion: After adjustment for baseline differences, no between-group differences in postoperative self-reported physical function were observed; consistently lower scores in the physiotherapy group may reflect systematic preoperative differences between groups.

术前物理治疗和初次全膝关节置换术后一年患者报告的结果:一项基于登记的队列研究,1,688例患者。
目的:原发性全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者术前物理治疗的目的是缓解疼痛,延迟手术,提高术后恢复。本研究探讨术前接受物理治疗(P)和未接受物理治疗(NP)的患者在原发性TKA后PROMs和疼痛的变化。设计:基于登记的队列研究,数据来自机构登记。患者:在2017年8月至2024年1月期间,1,688名患者遵循标准化的快速通道临床途径,并分为P或NP组。方法:主要观察指标为术后2个月和1年的KOOS-PS。次要结果包括疼痛、遗忘关节评分和EQ-5d-5L。两个与自我感知的膝关节功能和在12个月的随访中再次手术的意愿相关的锚定问题也被评估。结果:模型估计2个月时(1.12分,p = 0.079)和随访1年时(1.25分,p = 0.097) KOOS-PS组间无显著差异。描述性图的目视检查显示,NP患者在所有时间点具有更高的KOOS-PS,更少的疼痛,更好的关节评分和生活质量。在12个月的随访中,两组对锚定问题的回答相似。结论:调整基线差异后,两组患者术后自我报告的身体功能无明显差异;物理治疗组持续较低的评分可能反映了组间术前的系统性差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书