Developing and Piloting an Instrument to Prioritize the Worries of Female Youth with a Physical Disability and Mothers during the Transition to Adulthood.

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
MDM Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2026-06-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23814683261457144
Courtney S Streur, Dalia Elased, Jodi M Kreschmer, Rebecca Parten, Hamoud Alhazmi, Brittany Gay, Ashley Duby, Henrike L Schmalfuss, Jenna Goldstein, Grayson N Holmbeck, Lisa A Prosser, John F P Bridges
{"title":"Developing and Piloting an Instrument to Prioritize the Worries of Female Youth with a Physical Disability and Mothers during the Transition to Adulthood.","authors":"Courtney S Streur, Dalia Elased, Jodi M Kreschmer, Rebecca Parten, Hamoud Alhazmi, Brittany Gay, Ashley Duby, Henrike L Schmalfuss, Jenna Goldstein, Grayson N Holmbeck, Lisa A Prosser, John F P Bridges","doi":"10.1177/23814683261457144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transition to adulthood is a worrying time for female youth with a physical disability and their mothers. We sought to develop an instrument to assess which transition-related worries are most (and least) worrisome to youth and mothers to inform transition preparation interventions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A community-centered approach was used to identify and refine the most common transition-related worries of youth and mothers. A novel best-worst scaling (BWS) instrument was created in partnership with an advisory board of female youth with a physical disability and their mothers. BWS is a theory-driven survey method to identify priorities. The instrument was then pretested, refined, and piloted with youth and mothers. Findings were assessed by consultation with stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After input from youth and mothers, 11 transition-related worries were included in the pilot instrument using an object case experimental design. Pilot testing was conducted with 22 youth and 16 mothers, including 3 mother-daughter dyads. The completion rate was 86% for youth and 100% for mothers. The instrument was sensitive enough to detect differences between youth and mothers at both the aggregate and dyad level. On aggregate, both youth and mothers worried more about health-related compared to social-related worries but differed on the prioritization of independence-related worries. Discussion of results with participants and an advocacy group confirmed the face validity of the findings.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Male youth and fathers were not included.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The novel BWS instrument is feasible for female youth and mothers to complete independently and was valid in prioritizing worries on the aggregate and dyad levels.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>A subsequent large-scale study using the instrument may inform transition initiatives, while use among in a clinical setting may guide decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":36567,"journal":{"name":"MDM Policy and Practice","volume":"11 1","pages":"23814683261457144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13320067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MDM Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23814683261457144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The transition to adulthood is a worrying time for female youth with a physical disability and their mothers. We sought to develop an instrument to assess which transition-related worries are most (and least) worrisome to youth and mothers to inform transition preparation interventions.

Design: A community-centered approach was used to identify and refine the most common transition-related worries of youth and mothers. A novel best-worst scaling (BWS) instrument was created in partnership with an advisory board of female youth with a physical disability and their mothers. BWS is a theory-driven survey method to identify priorities. The instrument was then pretested, refined, and piloted with youth and mothers. Findings were assessed by consultation with stakeholders.

Results: After input from youth and mothers, 11 transition-related worries were included in the pilot instrument using an object case experimental design. Pilot testing was conducted with 22 youth and 16 mothers, including 3 mother-daughter dyads. The completion rate was 86% for youth and 100% for mothers. The instrument was sensitive enough to detect differences between youth and mothers at both the aggregate and dyad level. On aggregate, both youth and mothers worried more about health-related compared to social-related worries but differed on the prioritization of independence-related worries. Discussion of results with participants and an advocacy group confirmed the face validity of the findings.

Limitations: Male youth and fathers were not included.

Conclusions: The novel BWS instrument is feasible for female youth and mothers to complete independently and was valid in prioritizing worries on the aggregate and dyad levels.

Implications: A subsequent large-scale study using the instrument may inform transition initiatives, while use among in a clinical setting may guide decision making.

制定和试行一项工具,优先考虑有身体残疾的女性青年和母亲在向成年过渡期间的担忧。
背景:对于身体残疾的年轻女性和她们的母亲来说,向成年的过渡是一个令人担忧的时期。我们试图开发一种工具来评估哪些与过渡相关的担忧对年轻人和母亲来说是最(和最不)令人担忧的,以便为过渡准备干预提供信息。设计:采用以社区为中心的方法来确定和改进青年和母亲最常见的与过渡相关的担忧。与一个由身体残疾的女青年及其母亲组成的咨询委员会合作,创建了一种新的最佳-最差评定(BWS)工具。BWS是一种理论驱动的调查方法,用于确定优先事项。然后,对该仪器进行了预先测试、改进,并在青年和母亲中进行了试验。通过与利益相关者协商评估调查结果。结果:在青少年和母亲的意见输入后,采用对象案例实验设计将11个与过渡相关的担忧纳入试点工具。对22名青年和16名母亲进行了试点测试,其中包括3对母女。青少年的完成率为86%,母亲的完成率为100%。该仪器足够灵敏,可以在总体和双组水平上检测到年轻人和母亲之间的差异。总体而言,与社会相关的担忧相比,年轻人和母亲更担心与健康相关的担忧,但在与独立相关的担忧的优先级上存在差异。与参与者和一个倡导团体讨论结果,证实了研究结果的表面有效性。局限性:男性青年和父亲不包括在内。结论:新型BWS量表适用于女性青年和母亲独立完成,在整体和双元层面上对忧虑进行优先排序是有效的。含义:使用该仪器的后续大规模研究可能会为过渡举措提供信息,而在临床环境中使用可能会指导决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
MDM Policy and Practice
MDM Policy and Practice Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书