Surgical Fixation Enhances Discharge Independence in Elderly Patients With Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Nicholas F Quercetti, Steve DiStefano, Michael Yayac, Paul G Mastrokostas, John Getchell, Mitchell K Ng
{"title":"Surgical Fixation Enhances Discharge Independence in Elderly Patients With Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis.","authors":"Nicholas F Quercetti, Steve DiStefano, Michael Yayac, Paul G Mastrokostas, John Getchell, Mitchell K Ng","doi":"10.1097/BOT.0000000000003238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate outcomes following surgical and nonsurgical management of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) in elderly patients, focusing on pain relief, hospital course, complications, and discharge disposition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Design: Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Single Level I trauma center.</p><p><strong>Patient selection criteria: </strong>All patients aged 60 years and older treated for low-energy FFP (OTA/AO 61-A/B/C) between 2018 and 2022 by one fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeon were included. Patients with high-energy mechanisms, polytrauma, and non-osteoporotic pathologic fractures were excluded.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures and comparisons: </strong>Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at admission and discharge, hospital length of stay (LOS), in-hospital and 90-day complications, and discharge destination were compared among nonoperative, acute fixation, and delayed fixation cohorts. Acute fixation was defined as fixation during the index hospitalization, regardless of whether surgery was planned at admission or performed after failed inpatient mobilization. Delayed fixation was defined as fixation after discharge following initial nonoperative management.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>132 patients were included, including 56 managed nonoperatively and 76 treated operatively (55 acutely, 21 delayed). Patients treated nonoperatively were older than those treated operatively (84.1±8.28 vs 77.1±9.48 years, P<0.005), while the proportion of female patients was similar between groups (91.1% vs 84.2%, P=0.300). Admission VAS pain scores were 6.4, 6.3, and 5.9 for the acute fixation, delayed fixation, and nonoperative groups, respectively, and discharge VAS scores were 3.0, 3.6, and 3.4, with no significant differences between groups (P>0.05). Postoperative LOS, defined as the hospital stay associated with definitive treatment and excluding any prior index admission for delayed fixation patients, was longest after acute fixation (9.7 days) compared with delayed fixation (2.8 days) and nonoperative treatment (5.2 days, P<0.05). Discharge disposition differed, with home discharge occurring in 27.3% of acutely fixed patients, 76.2% of delayed fixation patients, and 14.3% managed nonoperatively (P<0.05), with disposition defined at discharge from the hospitalization associated with definitive treatment. Discharge home was approximately threefold higher in the operative cohort than nonoperative cohort (40.8% versus 14.3%, P<0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Percutaneous fixation of FFP was associated with greater likelihood of discharge home without increased complications. Acute fixation was associated with longer LOS.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":16644,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000003238","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate outcomes following surgical and nonsurgical management of fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) in elderly patients, focusing on pain relief, hospital course, complications, and discharge disposition.

Methods: Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Single Level I trauma center.

Patient selection criteria: All patients aged 60 years and older treated for low-energy FFP (OTA/AO 61-A/B/C) between 2018 and 2022 by one fellowship-trained orthopaedic trauma surgeon were included. Patients with high-energy mechanisms, polytrauma, and non-osteoporotic pathologic fractures were excluded.

Outcome measures and comparisons: Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores at admission and discharge, hospital length of stay (LOS), in-hospital and 90-day complications, and discharge destination were compared among nonoperative, acute fixation, and delayed fixation cohorts. Acute fixation was defined as fixation during the index hospitalization, regardless of whether surgery was planned at admission or performed after failed inpatient mobilization. Delayed fixation was defined as fixation after discharge following initial nonoperative management.

Results: 132 patients were included, including 56 managed nonoperatively and 76 treated operatively (55 acutely, 21 delayed). Patients treated nonoperatively were older than those treated operatively (84.1±8.28 vs 77.1±9.48 years, P<0.005), while the proportion of female patients was similar between groups (91.1% vs 84.2%, P=0.300). Admission VAS pain scores were 6.4, 6.3, and 5.9 for the acute fixation, delayed fixation, and nonoperative groups, respectively, and discharge VAS scores were 3.0, 3.6, and 3.4, with no significant differences between groups (P>0.05). Postoperative LOS, defined as the hospital stay associated with definitive treatment and excluding any prior index admission for delayed fixation patients, was longest after acute fixation (9.7 days) compared with delayed fixation (2.8 days) and nonoperative treatment (5.2 days, P<0.05). Discharge disposition differed, with home discharge occurring in 27.3% of acutely fixed patients, 76.2% of delayed fixation patients, and 14.3% managed nonoperatively (P<0.05), with disposition defined at discharge from the hospitalization associated with definitive treatment. Discharge home was approximately threefold higher in the operative cohort than nonoperative cohort (40.8% versus 14.3%, P<0.05).

Conclusions: Percutaneous fixation of FFP was associated with greater likelihood of discharge home without increased complications. Acute fixation was associated with longer LOS.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

手术内固定提高老年骨盆脆性骨折患者的出院独立性。
目的:评估老年患者骨盆脆性骨折(FFP)的手术和非手术治疗的结果,重点关注疼痛缓解、住院过程、并发症和出院处置。方法:设计:回顾性队列研究。地点:单一的一级创伤中心。患者选择标准:所有年龄在60岁及以上的患者在2018年至2022年期间接受低能FFP (OTA/ ao61 - a /B/C)治疗,由一名奖学金培训的骨科创伤外科医生。排除有高能机制、多发创伤和非骨质疏松性病理性骨折的患者。结果测量和比较:在非手术、急性固定和延迟固定队列中比较入院和出院时的视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、住院时间(LOS)、住院和90天并发症以及出院目的地。急性固定被定义为指数住院期间的固定,无论入院时是否计划手术或在住院活动失败后进行手术。延迟固定被定义为在初始非手术治疗后出院后固定。结果:纳入132例患者,其中非手术治疗56例,手术治疗76例(急性55例,延迟21例)。非手术组比手术组年龄大(84.1±8.28岁vs 77.1±9.48岁,P0.05)。术后LOS,定义为与最终治疗相关的住院时间,不包括延迟固定患者的任何先前指数入院,与延迟固定(2.8天)和非手术治疗(5.2天)相比,急性固定(9.7天)后最长,结论:经皮固定FFP与出院回家的可能性更大,且无并发症增加。急性固定与较长的LOS相关。证据等级:III级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma is devoted exclusively to the diagnosis and management of hard and soft tissue trauma, including injuries to bone, muscle, ligament, and tendons, as well as spinal cord injuries. Under the guidance of a distinguished international board of editors, the journal provides the most current information on diagnostic techniques, new and improved surgical instruments and procedures, surgical implants and prosthetic devices, bioplastics and biometals; and physical therapy and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书