The effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based interventions on treatment outcomes for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Kumaran Ramanujam, Samyr Carneiro, Mohamed Mohsen Helal, Vendhan Ramanujam
{"title":"The effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based interventions on treatment outcomes for low back pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Kumaran Ramanujam, Samyr Carneiro, Mohamed Mohsen Helal, Vendhan Ramanujam","doi":"10.1177/10538127261464781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundLow back pain is a global health challenge that requires constant progress to aid its management. Currently, artificial intelligence, as a major technological shift, has entered medicine to guide and improve management, and it is slowly being used for low back pain. With the growing number of studies, there is a lack of a summary of them.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based interventions in improving pain and functional outcomes among adults with low back pain when compared to standard interventions.MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted. Intervention groups received artificial intelligence-based interventions, while control groups received standard interventions for low back pain. After data extraction, assessment of risk of bias was done, and then a meta-analysis was performed.ResultsFive studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review, and four of them in the meta-analysis. Artificial intelligence-based interventions demonstrated lower pain scores (p = 0.001) and lower disability scores (p = 0.02) at endpoints than controls. Review of the studies revealed either significant or no improvement in the quality of recovery and psychological factors between the groups.ConclusionBased on the existing evidence, artificial intelligence-guided interventions, when compared to standard interventions, may improve pain and disability in adults with low back pain. But further research is necessary to establish its clinical relevance and future use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1892-1906"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261464781","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundLow back pain is a global health challenge that requires constant progress to aid its management. Currently, artificial intelligence, as a major technological shift, has entered medicine to guide and improve management, and it is slowly being used for low back pain. With the growing number of studies, there is a lack of a summary of them.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of artificial intelligence-based interventions in improving pain and functional outcomes among adults with low back pain when compared to standard interventions.MethodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted. Intervention groups received artificial intelligence-based interventions, while control groups received standard interventions for low back pain. After data extraction, assessment of risk of bias was done, and then a meta-analysis was performed.ResultsFive studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the systematic review, and four of them in the meta-analysis. Artificial intelligence-based interventions demonstrated lower pain scores (p = 0.001) and lower disability scores (p = 0.02) at endpoints than controls. Review of the studies revealed either significant or no improvement in the quality of recovery and psychological factors between the groups.ConclusionBased on the existing evidence, artificial intelligence-guided interventions, when compared to standard interventions, may improve pain and disability in adults with low back pain. But further research is necessary to establish its clinical relevance and future use.

基于人工智能的干预措施对腰痛治疗结果的有效性:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:腰痛是一个全球性的健康挑战,需要不断的进步来帮助其管理。目前,人工智能作为一项重大的技术转变,已经进入医学指导和改善管理,并正在慢慢用于治疗腰痛。随着研究的增多,缺乏对它们的总结。本研究的目的是研究与标准干预相比,基于人工智能的干预在改善成人腰痛患者疼痛和功能结局方面的有效性。方法综合检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science。干预组接受基于人工智能的干预,而对照组接受针对腰痛的标准干预。数据提取后,进行偏倚风险评估,然后进行meta分析。结果5项研究符合纳入标准,纳入系统评价,其中4项纳入meta分析。与对照组相比,基于人工智能的干预在终点显示较低的疼痛评分(p = 0.001)和较低的残疾评分(p = 0.02)。对这些研究的回顾显示,两组患者在康复质量和心理因素方面要么有显著改善,要么没有改善。结论基于现有证据,与标准干预相比,人工智能引导干预可能改善成人腰痛患者的疼痛和残疾。但需要进一步的研究来确定其临床意义和未来的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书