Jia Y Lim, Angela Y J Tan, Jason J I Chan, Xin F Leong, Zhongxi Zheng, Sui A Lie
{"title":"Escape room as a novel team-based activity during residency selection in anaesthesiology.","authors":"Jia Y Lim, Angela Y J Tan, Jason J I Chan, Xin F Leong, Zhongxi Zheng, Sui A Lie","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_162_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Residency selection in anaesthesiology traditionally relies on curriculum vitae review, work-based assessments, and behavioural interviews which may not adequately capture non-academic attributes. Emerging evidence suggests team-based assessments may offer a more dynamic evaluation of such qualities. This study explores the feasibility and acceptability of an escape room in Anaesthesiology residency selection and evaluates its potential to provide additional insights into candidate ranking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this pilot study, 26 candidates completed a team-based escape room activity assessing situational awareness, task management, and communication. Evaluations were conducted via customised rubric based on Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) domains, alongside traditional interviews. Escape room, interviews, and department survey scores were correlated with the final rank order list (ROL) using Spearman's coefficient. Candidate and panel feedback were collected post activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The candidates rated the escape room as part of the selection process positively. The panel feedback was generally supportive, though some suggested improving consistency and ease of evaluation. Interview (r = 0.603, <i>P</i> = 0.001) and survey scores (r = 0.921, <i>P</i> < 0.001) correlated strongly with the ROL, while escape room scores demonstrated a weak correlation (r = 0.244, <i>P</i> = 0.229). The lack of correlation likely reflects the low weight assigned to the escape room, consistent with its role as a complementary assessment, without implying direct impact on final ranking. Weak correlations with interview (r = 0.197, <i>P</i> = 0.334) and survey scores (r = 0.172, <i>P</i> = 0.400) suggest it may capture complementary attributes not assessed by traditional methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Escape rooms offer a novel approach to assessing non-academic attributes in residency selection, though further refinement is needed for consistent application.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"70 6","pages":"726-732"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13322587/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_162_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and aims: Residency selection in anaesthesiology traditionally relies on curriculum vitae review, work-based assessments, and behavioural interviews which may not adequately capture non-academic attributes. Emerging evidence suggests team-based assessments may offer a more dynamic evaluation of such qualities. This study explores the feasibility and acceptability of an escape room in Anaesthesiology residency selection and evaluates its potential to provide additional insights into candidate ranking.
Methods: In this pilot study, 26 candidates completed a team-based escape room activity assessing situational awareness, task management, and communication. Evaluations were conducted via customised rubric based on Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) domains, alongside traditional interviews. Escape room, interviews, and department survey scores were correlated with the final rank order list (ROL) using Spearman's coefficient. Candidate and panel feedback were collected post activity.
Results: The candidates rated the escape room as part of the selection process positively. The panel feedback was generally supportive, though some suggested improving consistency and ease of evaluation. Interview (r = 0.603, P = 0.001) and survey scores (r = 0.921, P < 0.001) correlated strongly with the ROL, while escape room scores demonstrated a weak correlation (r = 0.244, P = 0.229). The lack of correlation likely reflects the low weight assigned to the escape room, consistent with its role as a complementary assessment, without implying direct impact on final ranking. Weak correlations with interview (r = 0.197, P = 0.334) and survey scores (r = 0.172, P = 0.400) suggest it may capture complementary attributes not assessed by traditional methods.
Conclusion: Escape rooms offer a novel approach to assessing non-academic attributes in residency selection, though further refinement is needed for consistent application.
背景和目的:麻醉学住院医师的选择传统上依赖于简历审查、基于工作的评估和行为访谈,这些可能无法充分捕捉非学术属性。新出现的证据表明,基于团队的评估可能会对这些品质提供更动态的评估。本研究探讨了麻醉学住院医师选择中密室逃生的可行性和可接受性,并评估其潜力,为候选人排名提供额外的见解。方法:在这项初步研究中,26名候选人完成了以团队为基础的密室逃生活动,评估态势感知、任务管理和沟通。评估通过基于研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)领域的定制标题以及传统访谈进行。逃脱室、访谈和部门调查得分使用Spearman系数与最终rank order list (ROL)相关。活动结束后收集候选人和小组的反馈。结果:候选人对密室密室的评价是积极的,这是选择过程的一部分。小组的反馈大体上是支持的,尽管有些人建议改进评价的一致性和便利性。访谈得分(r = 0.603, P = 0.001)和调查得分(r = 0.921, P < 0.001)与ROL有较强的相关性,密室逃生得分与ROL有较弱的相关性(r = 0.244, P = 0.229)。缺乏相关性可能反映了密室密室被赋予的权重较低,这与它作为补充评估的作用是一致的,并不意味着对最终排名有直接影响。与访谈(r = 0.197, P = 0.334)和调查分数(r = 0.172, P = 0.400)的弱相关性表明,它可能捕捉到传统方法无法评估的互补属性。结论:逃生室为评估住院医师选择中的非学术属性提供了一种新颖的方法,尽管需要进一步完善以保持一致的应用。