Temporal and geographic disparities in mortality related to toxicity, adverse effects, and underdosing of anaesthetics in the United States: A CDC WONDER analysis.

IF 2.2 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-18 DOI:10.4103/ija.ija_409_26
Maryam Tariq, Ishwa Shakir, Muhammad Hussain Azhar, Muhammad Raza, Fnu Abubakar, Rizwan Ansari
{"title":"Temporal and geographic disparities in mortality related to toxicity, adverse effects, and underdosing of anaesthetics in the United States: A CDC WONDER analysis.","authors":"Maryam Tariq, Ishwa Shakir, Muhammad Hussain Azhar, Muhammad Raza, Fnu Abubakar, Rizwan Ansari","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_409_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Mortality attributed to anaesthetics and therapeutic gases is a public health concern. Recognition of this issue has increased over the years, yet research is limited. This study aimed to explore the trends and geographical differences in the United States.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Deaths attributed to toxicity, adverse effects, and underdosing of anaesthetics were traced from 1999 to 2022 using the data available on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) website. The data were analysed according to gender, age, race, and geographic region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 1999 and 2022, there were 10,157 anaesthesia-related deaths. The age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) increased from 0.1 to 0.4 from 1999 to 2022. AAMR stayed the same from 1999 to 2014, that is, 0.1 [annual percent change (APC) -0.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.9 to 3.4] and increased from 2014 to 2020 to 0.4 (APC: 27.28; 95% CI: 20.8 to 49.4) and from 2020 to 2022 at 0.42 (APC: 3.54; 95% CI: -4.6 to 17.1). Among Hispanics/Latinos, mortality decreased before having a sharp increase after 2019 (AAMR 0.09, 95% CI: 0.07-0.13). Non-Hispanics (NHs) showed a similar pattern, with a notable increase seen after 2016 (Overall AAMR 0.14, 95% CI: 0.13-0.16). The northeast region exhibited an AAMR of 0.21 (0.18-0.25), 95% CI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following a period of decline, mortality has increased in the United States since 2014. AAMRs were high among males, NHs, and residents of the Northeast region. The study highlights the increasing mortality along with the presence of disparities among gender, race, and region.</p>","PeriodicalId":13339,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","volume":"70 6","pages":"757-763"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13322598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_409_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Mortality attributed to anaesthetics and therapeutic gases is a public health concern. Recognition of this issue has increased over the years, yet research is limited. This study aimed to explore the trends and geographical differences in the United States.

Methods: Deaths attributed to toxicity, adverse effects, and underdosing of anaesthetics were traced from 1999 to 2022 using the data available on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) website. The data were analysed according to gender, age, race, and geographic region.

Results: Between 1999 and 2022, there were 10,157 anaesthesia-related deaths. The age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) increased from 0.1 to 0.4 from 1999 to 2022. AAMR stayed the same from 1999 to 2014, that is, 0.1 [annual percent change (APC) -0.12; 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.9 to 3.4] and increased from 2014 to 2020 to 0.4 (APC: 27.28; 95% CI: 20.8 to 49.4) and from 2020 to 2022 at 0.42 (APC: 3.54; 95% CI: -4.6 to 17.1). Among Hispanics/Latinos, mortality decreased before having a sharp increase after 2019 (AAMR 0.09, 95% CI: 0.07-0.13). Non-Hispanics (NHs) showed a similar pattern, with a notable increase seen after 2016 (Overall AAMR 0.14, 95% CI: 0.13-0.16). The northeast region exhibited an AAMR of 0.21 (0.18-0.25), 95% CI.

Conclusion: Following a period of decline, mortality has increased in the United States since 2014. AAMRs were high among males, NHs, and residents of the Northeast region. The study highlights the increasing mortality along with the presence of disparities among gender, race, and region.

美国与麻醉毒性、不良反应和剂量不足相关的死亡率的时间和地理差异:CDC WONDER分析
背景和目的:麻醉和治疗气体造成的死亡率是一个公共卫生问题。多年来,对这一问题的认识有所增加,但研究有限。本研究旨在探讨美国的趋势和地理差异。方法:使用疾病控制和预防中心广泛的流行病学研究在线数据(CDC WONDER)网站上的数据,追踪1999年至2022年因毒性、不良反应和麻醉剂剂量不足而导致的死亡。数据是根据性别、年龄、种族和地理区域进行分析的。结果:1999年至2022年间,有10157例麻醉相关死亡。1999年至2022年,年龄调整死亡率(AAMR)从0.1上升到0.4。1999 - 2014年AAMR保持不变,为0.1[年变化百分比(APC) -0.12;95%置信区间(CI): -3.9至3.4],从2014年到2020年增加到0.4 (APC: 27.28; 95% CI: 20.8至49.4),从2020年到2022年增加到0.42 (APC: 3.54; 95% CI: -4.6至17.1)。在西班牙裔/拉丁裔人群中,死亡率下降,但在2019年之后急剧上升(AAMR 0.09, 95% CI: 0.07-0.13)。非西班牙裔(NHs)也表现出类似的模式,在2016年之后显著增加(总体AAMR 0.14, 95% CI: 0.13-0.16)。东北地区AAMR为0.21 (0.18 ~ 0.25),95% CI。结论:在经历了一段时间的下降之后,自2014年以来,美国的死亡率有所上升。男性、NHs和东北地区居民的aamr较高。该研究强调了死亡率的上升以及性别、种族和地区之间存在的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
44.80%
发文量
210
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书