Cell-Free DNA Analysis With Clinicopathologic Factors for Early Detection and Refining Lymph Node Metastasis Risk in T1 Colorectal Cancer: Results From the COSMOS-CRC Study.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Tatsuro Murano, Hiroaki Ikematsu, Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Yuichiro Tsukada, Manabu Shiozawa, Takeshi Kato, Eiji Oki, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Yoshinori Kagawa, Akiyoshi Kanazawa, Takashi Ohta, Akira Ouchi, Hiroshi Uchigata, Chiemi Notake, Elmira Forouzmand, Yupeng He, Victoria M Raymond, Sven Duenwald, Hideaki Bando, Takayuki Yoshino, Yoshiaki Nakamura
{"title":"Cell-Free DNA Analysis With Clinicopathologic Factors for Early Detection and Refining Lymph Node Metastasis Risk in T1 Colorectal Cancer: Results From the COSMOS-CRC Study.","authors":"Tatsuro Murano, Hiroaki Ikematsu, Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Yuichiro Tsukada, Manabu Shiozawa, Takeshi Kato, Eiji Oki, Toshifumi Yamaguchi, Yoshinori Kagawa, Akiyoshi Kanazawa, Takashi Ohta, Akira Ouchi, Hiroshi Uchigata, Chiemi Notake, Elmira Forouzmand, Yupeng He, Victoria M Raymond, Sven Duenwald, Hideaki Bando, Takayuki Yoshino, Yoshiaki Nakamura","doi":"10.1200/PO-25-00941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Shield test is a blood-based assay that uses multimodal analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to enable noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of the cfDNA test for CRC and advanced precancerous lesions (APLs) and evaluate its potential clinical utility, particularly in early-stage disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, multicenter study, 451 patients with histologically confirmed CRC or APLs were enrolled across eight institutions. Blood samples collected before treatment were analyzed using the cfDNA test (Shield, Guardant Health, United States). We assessed the sensitivity of the test for different CRC stages and APLs. In addition, we examined the correlation between test positivity and clinicopathologic factors in stage I and T1 CRC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The test showed 87.9% sensitivity for CRC overall, with stage-specific sensitivities of 71.2% for stage I and 97.4% for stages II-IV. Sensitivity for APLs was 37.0%. In stage I CRC, test positivity was significantly associated with tumor depth (T2: 88.6% <i>v</i> T1: 59.7%, <i>P</i> < .01). Among 70 patients with T1 CRC, the test detected all to have lymph node metastasis (LNM; 100% sensitivity). Compared with guideline-based pathologic criteria, the cfDNA test achieved higher specificity for LNM prediction (38.7% <i>v</i> 11.3%), thereby potentially reducing the frequency of unnecessary radical surgery from 78.6% to 54.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This cfDNA blood-based test shows a robust diagnostic performance in CRC detection. It may improve risk stratification and support more tailored clinical decision making, particularly in the management of T1 CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"10 7","pages":"e2500941"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13336683/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00941","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The Shield test is a blood-based assay that uses multimodal analysis of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) to enable noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) detection. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of the cfDNA test for CRC and advanced precancerous lesions (APLs) and evaluate its potential clinical utility, particularly in early-stage disease.

Methods: In this prospective, multicenter study, 451 patients with histologically confirmed CRC or APLs were enrolled across eight institutions. Blood samples collected before treatment were analyzed using the cfDNA test (Shield, Guardant Health, United States). We assessed the sensitivity of the test for different CRC stages and APLs. In addition, we examined the correlation between test positivity and clinicopathologic factors in stage I and T1 CRC.

Results: The test showed 87.9% sensitivity for CRC overall, with stage-specific sensitivities of 71.2% for stage I and 97.4% for stages II-IV. Sensitivity for APLs was 37.0%. In stage I CRC, test positivity was significantly associated with tumor depth (T2: 88.6% v T1: 59.7%, P < .01). Among 70 patients with T1 CRC, the test detected all to have lymph node metastasis (LNM; 100% sensitivity). Compared with guideline-based pathologic criteria, the cfDNA test achieved higher specificity for LNM prediction (38.7% v 11.3%), thereby potentially reducing the frequency of unnecessary radical surgery from 78.6% to 54.3%.

Conclusion: This cfDNA blood-based test shows a robust diagnostic performance in CRC detection. It may improve risk stratification and support more tailored clinical decision making, particularly in the management of T1 CRC.

无细胞DNA分析与临床病理因素对早期发现和改善T1期结直肠癌淋巴结转移风险的影响:COSMOS-CRC研究的结果
目的:Shield检测是一种基于血液的检测方法,使用无细胞DNA (cfDNA)的多模态分析来实现非侵入性结直肠癌(CRC)的检测。本研究的目的是评估cfDNA检测对结直肠癌和晚期癌前病变(apl)的诊断性能,并评估其潜在的临床应用,特别是在早期疾病中的应用。方法:在这项前瞻性的多中心研究中,来自8个机构的451例组织学证实的CRC或apl患者入组。治疗前收集的血液样本使用cfDNA测试(美国Guardant Health公司的Shield)进行分析。我们评估了该测试对不同CRC分期和api的敏感性。此外,我们还研究了I期和T1期CRC的检测阳性与临床病理因素的相关性。结果:该测试对CRC的总体敏感性为87.9%,对I期和II-IV期的分期特异性敏感性分别为71.2%和97.4%。对api的敏感性为37.0%。在I期CRC中,检测阳性与肿瘤深度显著相关(T2: 88.6% v T1: 59.7%, P < 0.01)。在70例T1期结直肠癌患者中,该试验检测出所有患者均有淋巴结转移(LNM, 100%灵敏度)。与基于指南的病理标准相比,cfDNA检测在预测LNM方面具有更高的特异性(38.7% vs 11.3%),从而可能将不必要的根治性手术的频率从78.6%降低到54.3%。结论:cfDNA血液检测在CRC检测中具有较强的诊断能力。它可以改善风险分层,并支持更有针对性的临床决策,特别是在T1 CRC的管理中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书