Accuracy of splenic stiffness measurement for predicting clinically significant varices in children with portal hypertension: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

IF 2.6 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Aditi Kumar, Ranjan Kumar Patel, Vijay Kumar Krishnegowda
{"title":"Accuracy of splenic stiffness measurement for predicting clinically significant varices in children with portal hypertension: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.","authors":"Aditi Kumar, Ranjan Kumar Patel, Vijay Kumar Krishnegowda","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2026-002246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of splenic stiffness measurement (SSM) for detecting clinically significant varices (CSV) in children with portal hypertension (PHTN), including non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) and chronic liver disease (CLD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Scopus were searched from inception to 31 July 2025. No language or time limitations were applied.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included prospective and retrospective studies which had children (<18 years) with clinically, radiologically, biochemically or histologically diagnosed PHTN. The index test was SSM (transient elastography, 2D-shear wave elastography (SWE) or point-SWE/acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI)). The reference standard was oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Studies with other reference standards, like liver biopsy, were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Two reviewers independently extracted data. A Bayesian random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity with 95% credible intervals (CrIs), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and certainty of evidence (COE) was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 (n=1027) were eligible for meta-analysis. For CLD (8 studies, n=405), summary sensitivity was 83.0% (95% CrI 69.9% to 91.0%) and specificity was 75.7% (60.8%-85.2%), showing low certainty for CSV. In NCPH (6 studies, n=171), sensitivity for CSV was 92.5% (82.7%-97.0%) and specificity was 80.3% (57.6%-92.7%), with moderate COE for sensitivity and low COE for specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SSM probably has high sensitivity and may have moderate specificity for detecting CSV in children with NCPH. In CLD, diagnostic accuracy remains uncertain due to low COE. Further well-designed, aetiology-specific studies are needed to establish the role of SSM in the clinical pathway.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024579988.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13330975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2026-002246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of splenic stiffness measurement (SSM) for detecting clinically significant varices (CSV) in children with portal hypertension (PHTN), including non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) and chronic liver disease (CLD).

Design: Systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.

Data sources: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Scopus were searched from inception to 31 July 2025. No language or time limitations were applied.

Eligibility criteria: We included prospective and retrospective studies which had children (<18 years) with clinically, radiologically, biochemically or histologically diagnosed PHTN. The index test was SSM (transient elastography, 2D-shear wave elastography (SWE) or point-SWE/acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI)). The reference standard was oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Studies with other reference standards, like liver biopsy, were excluded.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data. A Bayesian random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity with 95% credible intervals (CrIs), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and certainty of evidence (COE) was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.

Results: 21 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 (n=1027) were eligible for meta-analysis. For CLD (8 studies, n=405), summary sensitivity was 83.0% (95% CrI 69.9% to 91.0%) and specificity was 75.7% (60.8%-85.2%), showing low certainty for CSV. In NCPH (6 studies, n=171), sensitivity for CSV was 92.5% (82.7%-97.0%) and specificity was 80.3% (57.6%-92.7%), with moderate COE for sensitivity and low COE for specificity.

Conclusions: SSM probably has high sensitivity and may have moderate specificity for detecting CSV in children with NCPH. In CLD, diagnostic accuracy remains uncertain due to low COE. Further well-designed, aetiology-specific studies are needed to establish the role of SSM in the clinical pathway.

Prospero registration number: CRD42024579988.

脾刚度测量预测门脉高压患儿临床显著静脉曲张的准确性:一项系统综述和诊断测试准确性荟萃分析。
目的:评价脾刚度测量(SSM)对门脉高压(PHTN)包括非肝硬化门脉高压(NCPH)和慢性肝病(CLD)患儿临床显著性静脉曲张(CSV)的诊断准确性。设计:系统评价和诊断测试准确性荟萃分析。数据来源:MEDLINE(通过PubMed), Embase和Scopus检索自成立至2025年7月31日。没有语言或时间限制。入选标准:纳入有儿童的前瞻性和回顾性研究(数据提取和综合:两名审稿人独立提取数据)。采用贝叶斯随机效应双变量模型,以95%可信区间(CrIs)估计汇总敏感性和特异性,并构建分层汇总接收者工作特征曲线。使用QUADAS-2评估偏倚风险,使用推荐、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)方法评估证据的确定性(COE)。结果:21项研究被纳入系统评价,14项(n=1027)符合meta分析。对于CLD(8项研究,n=405),总敏感性为83.0% (95% CrI 69.9% ~ 91.0%),特异性为75.7% (60.8% ~ 85.2%),CSV的确定性较低。在NCPH(6项研究,n=171)中,CSV的敏感性为92.5%(82.7% ~ 97.0%),特异性为80.3%(57.6% ~ 92.7%),敏感性为中等COE,特异性为低COE。结论:SSM检测NCPH患儿CSV可能具有较高的敏感性和中等的特异性。在CLD中,由于低COE,诊断准确性仍然不确定。需要进一步精心设计的病因特异性研究来确定SSM在临床途径中的作用。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42024579988。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书