Accuracy of splenic stiffness measurement for predicting clinically significant varices in children with portal hypertension: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
{"title":"Accuracy of splenic stiffness measurement for predicting clinically significant varices in children with portal hypertension: a systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.","authors":"Aditi Kumar, Ranjan Kumar Patel, Vijay Kumar Krishnegowda","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2026-002246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of splenic stiffness measurement (SSM) for detecting clinically significant varices (CSV) in children with portal hypertension (PHTN), including non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) and chronic liver disease (CLD).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Scopus were searched from inception to 31 July 2025. No language or time limitations were applied.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included prospective and retrospective studies which had children (<18 years) with clinically, radiologically, biochemically or histologically diagnosed PHTN. The index test was SSM (transient elastography, 2D-shear wave elastography (SWE) or point-SWE/acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI)). The reference standard was oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Studies with other reference standards, like liver biopsy, were excluded.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Two reviewers independently extracted data. A Bayesian random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity with 95% credible intervals (CrIs), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and certainty of evidence (COE) was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>21 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 (n=1027) were eligible for meta-analysis. For CLD (8 studies, n=405), summary sensitivity was 83.0% (95% CrI 69.9% to 91.0%) and specificity was 75.7% (60.8%-85.2%), showing low certainty for CSV. In NCPH (6 studies, n=171), sensitivity for CSV was 92.5% (82.7%-97.0%) and specificity was 80.3% (57.6%-92.7%), with moderate COE for sensitivity and low COE for specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SSM probably has high sensitivity and may have moderate specificity for detecting CSV in children with NCPH. In CLD, diagnostic accuracy remains uncertain due to low COE. Further well-designed, aetiology-specific studies are needed to establish the role of SSM in the clinical pathway.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42024579988.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13330975/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2026-002246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of splenic stiffness measurement (SSM) for detecting clinically significant varices (CSV) in children with portal hypertension (PHTN), including non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) and chronic liver disease (CLD).
Design: Systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis.
Data sources: MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase and Scopus were searched from inception to 31 July 2025. No language or time limitations were applied.
Eligibility criteria: We included prospective and retrospective studies which had children (<18 years) with clinically, radiologically, biochemically or histologically diagnosed PHTN. The index test was SSM (transient elastography, 2D-shear wave elastography (SWE) or point-SWE/acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI)). The reference standard was oesophagogastroduodenoscopy. Studies with other reference standards, like liver biopsy, were excluded.
Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted data. A Bayesian random-effects bivariate model was used to estimate summary sensitivity and specificity with 95% credible intervals (CrIs), and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2, and certainty of evidence (COE) was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach.
Results: 21 studies were included in the systematic review and 14 (n=1027) were eligible for meta-analysis. For CLD (8 studies, n=405), summary sensitivity was 83.0% (95% CrI 69.9% to 91.0%) and specificity was 75.7% (60.8%-85.2%), showing low certainty for CSV. In NCPH (6 studies, n=171), sensitivity for CSV was 92.5% (82.7%-97.0%) and specificity was 80.3% (57.6%-92.7%), with moderate COE for sensitivity and low COE for specificity.
Conclusions: SSM probably has high sensitivity and may have moderate specificity for detecting CSV in children with NCPH. In CLD, diagnostic accuracy remains uncertain due to low COE. Further well-designed, aetiology-specific studies are needed to establish the role of SSM in the clinical pathway.
期刊介绍:
BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.