GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Across Myocardial Infarction-Defined Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pedro Gomes Batista, Railla Raquel Albino dos Santos Silva, Marcela Vasconcelos Montenegro, Mushrin Malik, Mrunalini Dandamudi, Juan Peres de Oliveira, Maria Eduarda Molinari, Larissa Araujo de Lucena, Ramon Huntermann, Juliana Giorgi, Caroline O. Fischer Bacca
{"title":"GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Across Myocardial Infarction-Defined Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Pedro Gomes Batista,&nbsp;Railla Raquel Albino dos Santos Silva,&nbsp;Marcela Vasconcelos Montenegro,&nbsp;Mushrin Malik,&nbsp;Mrunalini Dandamudi,&nbsp;Juan Peres de Oliveira,&nbsp;Maria Eduarda Molinari,&nbsp;Larissa Araujo de Lucena,&nbsp;Ramon Huntermann,&nbsp;Juliana Giorgi,&nbsp;Caroline O. Fischer Bacca","doi":"10.1007/s40256-026-00809-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who survive myocardial infarction (MI) remain at high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events and heart failure (HF). Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) reduces cardiovascular events in stable atherosclerotic disease, its impact among patients with established MI has not been comprehensively synthesized.</p><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with T2DM across MI-defined cohorts.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic, and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated to estimate the expected range of true effects in future clinical settings. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, study-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), MI, stroke, and HF or hospitalization for HF. A sensitivity analysis using the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman (HKSJ) adjustment was performed to account for the small number of included studies and substantial heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using R software version 4.5.0.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven studies, including 37,393 patients with T2DM from MI-defined populations (9556 receiving GLP-1 RA), were analyzed. GLP-1 RA use was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49–0.90; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 87.3%; PI, 0.27–1.63; <i>P</i> = 0.0085), reduced study-defined MACE (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56–0.84; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 55.6%; PI, 0.44–1.06; <i>P</i> = 0.0002), and fewer HF events or hospitalizations for HF (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62–0.98; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 77.6%; PI, 0.42–1.45; <i>P</i> = 0.0306). No significant associations were observed for cardiovascular death (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.67–1.06; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 0%; PI, 0.42–1.69; <i>P</i> = 0.15), recurrent MI (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.62–1.09; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 63%; PI, 0.41–1.63; <i>P</i> = 0.1753), or stroke (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.68–1.22; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 61.2%; PI, 0.40–2.05; <i>P</i> = 0.5237). In the sensitivity analysis using the HKSJ adjustment, statistical significance was lost for all endpoints, including all-cause mortality (<i>P</i> = 0.05), study-defined MACE (<i>P</i> = 0.13), and HF or hospitalization for HF (<i>P</i> = 0.06).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In patients with T2DM across MI-defined populations, GLP-1 RA use showed signals toward lower all-cause mortality, study-defined MACE, and HF-related events; however, these findings remain exploratory because of substantial heterogeneity, wide PIs, and attenuation of statistical significance under HKSJ adjustment.</p><h3>Registration</h3><p>PROSPERO identifier no. CRD420251270326.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7652,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","volume":"26 5","pages":"573 - 587"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40256-026-00809-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who survive myocardial infarction (MI) remain at high risk for recurrent cardiovascular events and heart failure (HF). Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) reduces cardiovascular events in stable atherosclerotic disease, its impact among patients with established MI has not been comprehensively synthesized.

Objectives

To evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with T2DM across MI-defined cohorts.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic, and 95% prediction intervals (PIs) were calculated to estimate the expected range of true effects in future clinical settings. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, study-defined major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), MI, stroke, and HF or hospitalization for HF. A sensitivity analysis using the Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman (HKSJ) adjustment was performed to account for the small number of included studies and substantial heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using R software version 4.5.0.

Results

Seven studies, including 37,393 patients with T2DM from MI-defined populations (9556 receiving GLP-1 RA), were analyzed. GLP-1 RA use was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49–0.90; I2 = 87.3%; PI, 0.27–1.63; P = 0.0085), reduced study-defined MACE (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56–0.84; I2 = 55.6%; PI, 0.44–1.06; P = 0.0002), and fewer HF events or hospitalizations for HF (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62–0.98; I2 = 77.6%; PI, 0.42–1.45; P = 0.0306). No significant associations were observed for cardiovascular death (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.67–1.06; I2 = 0%; PI, 0.42–1.69; P = 0.15), recurrent MI (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.62–1.09; I2 = 63%; PI, 0.41–1.63; P = 0.1753), or stroke (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.68–1.22; I2 = 61.2%; PI, 0.40–2.05; P = 0.5237). In the sensitivity analysis using the HKSJ adjustment, statistical significance was lost for all endpoints, including all-cause mortality (P = 0.05), study-defined MACE (P = 0.13), and HF or hospitalization for HF (P = 0.06).

Conclusions

In patients with T2DM across MI-defined populations, GLP-1 RA use showed signals toward lower all-cause mortality, study-defined MACE, and HF-related events; however, these findings remain exploratory because of substantial heterogeneity, wide PIs, and attenuation of statistical significance under HKSJ adjustment.

Registration

PROSPERO identifier no. CRD420251270326.

Graphical Abstract

GLP-1受体激动剂和心肌梗死人群中2型糖尿病患者的心血管结局:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:存活于心肌梗死(MI)的2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者仍然具有复发性心血管事件和心力衰竭(HF)的高风险。虽然胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)在稳定的动脉粥样硬化疾病中可减少心血管事件,但其对心肌梗死患者的影响尚未全面合成。目的:评估GLP-1 RA的使用与T2DM患者心血管结局之间的关系。方法:检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库。风险比(hr)和95%置信区间(ci)采用随机效应模型进行汇总。使用I2统计量评估异质性,并计算95%预测区间(pi)以估计未来临床环境中真实效果的预期范围。结果包括全因死亡率、心血管死亡、研究定义的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、心肌梗死、卒中和心衰或因心衰住院。采用hartung - knap - sidik - jonkman (HKSJ)调整进行敏感性分析,以解释纳入的研究数量少和大量异质性。采用R软件4.5.0进行统计分析。结果:7项研究,包括37,393例来自mi定义人群的T2DM患者(9556例接受GLP-1 RA)进行了分析。GLP-1 RA的使用降低了全因死亡率(HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.49-0.90; I2 = 87.3%; PI, 0.27-1.63; P = 0.0085),降低了研究定义的MACE (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56-0.84; I2 = 55.6%; PI, 0.44-1.06; P = 0.0002),减少了HF事件或因HF住院的次数(HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.62-0.98; I2 = 77.6%; PI, 0.42-1.45; P = 0.0306)。心血管死亡(HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.67-1.06; I2 = 0%; PI, 0.42-1.69; P = 0.15)、复发性心肌梗死(HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.62-1.09; I2 = 63%; PI, 0.41-1.63; P = 0.1753)或卒中(HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.68-1.22; I2 = 61.2%; PI, 0.40-2.05; P = 0.5237)无显著相关性。在使用HKSJ调整的敏感性分析中,所有终点均无统计学意义,包括全因死亡率(P = 0.05)、研究定义的MACE (P = 0.13)、HF或HF住院率(P = 0.06)。结论:在mi定义人群中的T2DM患者中,GLP-1 RA的使用显示出全因死亡率、研究定义的MACE和hf相关事件降低的信号;然而,这些发现仍然是探索性的,因为在香港恒生指数调整下,存在大量的异质性、较宽的pi和统计显著性衰减。注册:普洛斯彼罗标识号CRD420251270326。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting rational therapy within the discipline of cardiology, the American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs covers all aspects of the treatment of cardiovascular disorders, particularly the place in therapy of newer and established agents. Via a program of reviews and original clinical research articles, the journal addresses major issues relating to treatment of these disorders, including the pharmacology, efficacy and adverse effects of the major classes of drugs; information on newly developed drugs and drug classes; the therapeutic implications of latest research into the aetiology of cardiovascular disorders; and the practical management of specific clinical situations. The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书