{"title":"Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches for Forecasting and Predicting Air Pollution: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Anass Houdou, Imad El Badisy, Kenza Khomsi, Sammila Andrade Abdala, Fayez Abdulla, Houda Najmi, Majdouline Obtel, Lahcen Belyamani, Azeddine Ibrahimi, Mohamed Khalis","doi":"10.4209/aaqr.230151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many studies use machine learning to predict atmospheric pollutant levels, prioritizing accuracy over interpretability. This systematic review will focus on reviewing studies that have utilized interpretable machine learning models to enhance interpretability while maintaining high accuracy for air pollution prediction. The search terms \"air pollution,\" \"machine learning,\" and \"interpretability\" were used to identify relevant studies published between 2011 and 2023 from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and JuSER. The included studies were assessed for quality based on an ecological checklist for maximizing reproducibility of ecological niche models. Among the 5,396 identified studies, 480 focused on air pollution prediction, with 56 providing model interpretations. Among the studies, 20 methods were identified: 8 model-agnostic methods, 4 model-specific methods, and 8 hybrid models. Shapley additive explanations was the most commonly used method (46.4%), followed by partial dependence plots (17.4%), both of which are model-agnostic methods. These methods identify important atmospheric features, enhancing researchers' understanding and making machine learning outcomes more accessible to non-experts. This can enhance prediction and prevention of adverse weather events and air pollution, benefiting public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":7402,"journal":{"name":"Aerosol and Air Quality Research","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13319251/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aerosol and Air Quality Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.230151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Many studies use machine learning to predict atmospheric pollutant levels, prioritizing accuracy over interpretability. This systematic review will focus on reviewing studies that have utilized interpretable machine learning models to enhance interpretability while maintaining high accuracy for air pollution prediction. The search terms "air pollution," "machine learning," and "interpretability" were used to identify relevant studies published between 2011 and 2023 from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and JuSER. The included studies were assessed for quality based on an ecological checklist for maximizing reproducibility of ecological niche models. Among the 5,396 identified studies, 480 focused on air pollution prediction, with 56 providing model interpretations. Among the studies, 20 methods were identified: 8 model-agnostic methods, 4 model-specific methods, and 8 hybrid models. Shapley additive explanations was the most commonly used method (46.4%), followed by partial dependence plots (17.4%), both of which are model-agnostic methods. These methods identify important atmospheric features, enhancing researchers' understanding and making machine learning outcomes more accessible to non-experts. This can enhance prediction and prevention of adverse weather events and air pollution, benefiting public health.
许多研究使用机器学习来预测大气污染物水平,优先考虑准确性而不是可解释性。本系统综述将重点回顾利用可解释机器学习模型来提高可解释性的研究,同时保持空气污染预测的高精度。搜索词“空气污染”、“机器学习”和“可解释性”用于识别2011年至2023年间发表在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Science Direct和JuSER上的相关研究。根据生态检查表对纳入的研究进行质量评估,以最大限度地提高生态位模型的可重复性。在5396项已确定的研究中,480项侧重于空气污染预测,56项提供模型解释。在这些研究中,确定了20种方法:8种模型不可知方法,4种模型特定方法,8种混合模型。Shapley加性解释是最常用的方法(46.4%),其次是部分依赖图(17.4%),两者都是模型不可知的方法。这些方法可以识别重要的大气特征,增强研究人员的理解,并使非专家更容易获得机器学习结果。这可以加强对恶劣天气事件和空气污染的预测和预防,有利于公众健康。
期刊介绍:
The international journal of Aerosol and Air Quality Research (AAQR) covers all aspects of aerosol science and technology, atmospheric science and air quality related issues. It encompasses a multi-disciplinary field, including:
- Aerosol, air quality, atmospheric chemistry and global change;
- Air toxics (hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), persistent organic pollutants (POPs)) - Sources, control, transport and fate, human exposure;
- Nanoparticle and nanotechnology;
- Sources, combustion, thermal decomposition, emission, properties, behavior, formation, transport, deposition, measurement and analysis;
- Effects on the environments;
- Air quality and human health;
- Bioaerosols;
- Indoor air quality;
- Energy and air pollution;
- Pollution control technologies;
- Invention and improvement of sampling instruments and technologies;
- Optical/radiative properties and remote sensing;
- Carbon dioxide emission, capture, storage and utilization; novel methods for the reduction of carbon dioxide emission;
- Other topics related to aerosol and air quality.