From Gene Copies to Cell Numbers: Advancing Quantitative Approaches in Protistan Ecology Using Digital PCR

IF 5.9 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Megan Gross, Ulrike Koll, Bettina Sonntag, Thorsten Stoeck
{"title":"From Gene Copies to Cell Numbers: Advancing Quantitative Approaches in Protistan Ecology Using Digital PCR","authors":"Megan Gross,&nbsp;Ulrike Koll,&nbsp;Bettina Sonntag,&nbsp;Thorsten Stoeck","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantifying abundances of unicellular eukaryotes (protists) remains a central challenge in microbial ecology, as methodological differences can strongly influence abundance estimates and ecological interpretation. Although molecular tools have thus far greatly improved our understanding of protists, high rRNA gene copy numbers limit quantitative inferences. Digital PCR (dPCR) has emerged as a promising tool for absolute quantification, yet its application for unicellular eukaryotes and its comparability to established cell-based methods remain insufficiently explored. Here, we develop species-specific dPCR assays for two important freshwater ciliates (<i>Urotricha castalia</i> and <i>Urotricha pseudofurcata</i>) and establish gene copy number correction factors to enable highly accurate quantitative abundance estimates. We assess assay performance using controlled laboratory experiments and apply the approach to environmental samples, directly benchmarking dPCR against catalyzed reporter deposition-FISH (CARD-FISH). Under controlled conditions, dPCR and CARD-FISH yielded comparable accuracy, with dPCR showing superior precision. In field applications, method-dependent differences emerged, reflecting both methodological constraints and biological variability. Notably, dPCR provided an overall higher sensitivity, enabling robust detection of low-abundance taxa. Our results highlight dPCR as a scalable and sensitive approach that, when combined with appropriate correction strategies, represents a significant step towards more reliable molecular quantification of protists. At the same time, differences between methods underscore the value of integrating molecular and microscopy-based approaches. We propose that combining dPCR with tools such as CARD-FISH can offer complementary insights into protist population dynamics. Such integrative frameworks provide a powerful path forward for improving abundance estimates and advancing quantitative microbial ecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1755-0998.70177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology Resources","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1755-0998.70177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Quantifying abundances of unicellular eukaryotes (protists) remains a central challenge in microbial ecology, as methodological differences can strongly influence abundance estimates and ecological interpretation. Although molecular tools have thus far greatly improved our understanding of protists, high rRNA gene copy numbers limit quantitative inferences. Digital PCR (dPCR) has emerged as a promising tool for absolute quantification, yet its application for unicellular eukaryotes and its comparability to established cell-based methods remain insufficiently explored. Here, we develop species-specific dPCR assays for two important freshwater ciliates (Urotricha castalia and Urotricha pseudofurcata) and establish gene copy number correction factors to enable highly accurate quantitative abundance estimates. We assess assay performance using controlled laboratory experiments and apply the approach to environmental samples, directly benchmarking dPCR against catalyzed reporter deposition-FISH (CARD-FISH). Under controlled conditions, dPCR and CARD-FISH yielded comparable accuracy, with dPCR showing superior precision. In field applications, method-dependent differences emerged, reflecting both methodological constraints and biological variability. Notably, dPCR provided an overall higher sensitivity, enabling robust detection of low-abundance taxa. Our results highlight dPCR as a scalable and sensitive approach that, when combined with appropriate correction strategies, represents a significant step towards more reliable molecular quantification of protists. At the same time, differences between methods underscore the value of integrating molecular and microscopy-based approaches. We propose that combining dPCR with tools such as CARD-FISH can offer complementary insights into protist population dynamics. Such integrative frameworks provide a powerful path forward for improving abundance estimates and advancing quantitative microbial ecology.

Abstract Image

从基因拷贝到细胞数量:利用数字PCR推进原生生物生态学的定量方法。
定量单细胞真核生物(原生生物)的丰度仍然是微生物生态学的核心挑战,因为方法上的差异会严重影响丰度估计和生态学解释。尽管分子工具迄今已大大提高了我们对原生生物的了解,但高rRNA基因拷贝数限制了定量推断。数字PCR (dPCR)已成为一种有前途的绝对定量工具,但其在单细胞真核生物中的应用及其与已建立的基于细胞的方法的可比性仍未充分探索。在这里,我们开发了两种重要的淡水纤毛虫(castalia Urotricha和pseudofurcata Urotricha)的物种特异性dPCR分析,并建立了基因拷贝数校正因子,以实现高度准确的定量丰度估计。我们使用受控实验室实验评估分析性能,并将该方法应用于环境样品,直接对dPCR与催化报告沉积- fish (CARD-FISH)进行基准测试。在控制条件下,dPCR和CARD-FISH产生相当的准确性,dPCR显示出更高的精度。在实地应用中,出现了方法相关的差异,反映了方法限制和生物多样性。值得注意的是,dPCR总体上提供了更高的灵敏度,能够检测低丰度的分类群。我们的研究结果突出了dPCR作为一种可扩展和敏感的方法,当与适当的校正策略相结合时,代表了向更可靠的原生生物分子定量迈出的重要一步。同时,方法之间的差异强调了整合分子和基于显微镜的方法的价值。我们建议将dPCR与CARD-FISH等工具相结合,可以提供对原生生物种群动态的补充见解。这种综合框架为改进丰度估算和推进微生物生态学定量研究提供了有力的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Molecular Ecology Resources
Molecular Ecology Resources 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
15.60
自引率
5.20%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Molecular Ecology Resources promotes the creation of comprehensive resources for the scientific community, encompassing computer programs, statistical and molecular advancements, and a diverse array of molecular tools. Serving as a conduit for disseminating these resources, the journal targets a broad audience of researchers in the fields of evolution, ecology, and conservation. Articles in Molecular Ecology Resources are crafted to support investigations tackling significant questions within these disciplines. In addition to original resource articles, Molecular Ecology Resources features Reviews, Opinions, and Comments relevant to the field. The journal also periodically releases Special Issues focusing on resource development within specific areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书