{"title":"From Gene Copies to Cell Numbers: Advancing Quantitative Approaches in Protistan Ecology Using Digital PCR","authors":"Megan Gross, Ulrike Koll, Bettina Sonntag, Thorsten Stoeck","doi":"10.1111/1755-0998.70177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Quantifying abundances of unicellular eukaryotes (protists) remains a central challenge in microbial ecology, as methodological differences can strongly influence abundance estimates and ecological interpretation. Although molecular tools have thus far greatly improved our understanding of protists, high rRNA gene copy numbers limit quantitative inferences. Digital PCR (dPCR) has emerged as a promising tool for absolute quantification, yet its application for unicellular eukaryotes and its comparability to established cell-based methods remain insufficiently explored. Here, we develop species-specific dPCR assays for two important freshwater ciliates (<i>Urotricha castalia</i> and <i>Urotricha pseudofurcata</i>) and establish gene copy number correction factors to enable highly accurate quantitative abundance estimates. We assess assay performance using controlled laboratory experiments and apply the approach to environmental samples, directly benchmarking dPCR against catalyzed reporter deposition-FISH (CARD-FISH). Under controlled conditions, dPCR and CARD-FISH yielded comparable accuracy, with dPCR showing superior precision. In field applications, method-dependent differences emerged, reflecting both methodological constraints and biological variability. Notably, dPCR provided an overall higher sensitivity, enabling robust detection of low-abundance taxa. Our results highlight dPCR as a scalable and sensitive approach that, when combined with appropriate correction strategies, represents a significant step towards more reliable molecular quantification of protists. At the same time, differences between methods underscore the value of integrating molecular and microscopy-based approaches. We propose that combining dPCR with tools such as CARD-FISH can offer complementary insights into protist population dynamics. Such integrative frameworks provide a powerful path forward for improving abundance estimates and advancing quantitative microbial ecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":211,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Ecology Resources","volume":"26 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1755-0998.70177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Ecology Resources","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1755-0998.70177","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Quantifying abundances of unicellular eukaryotes (protists) remains a central challenge in microbial ecology, as methodological differences can strongly influence abundance estimates and ecological interpretation. Although molecular tools have thus far greatly improved our understanding of protists, high rRNA gene copy numbers limit quantitative inferences. Digital PCR (dPCR) has emerged as a promising tool for absolute quantification, yet its application for unicellular eukaryotes and its comparability to established cell-based methods remain insufficiently explored. Here, we develop species-specific dPCR assays for two important freshwater ciliates (Urotricha castalia and Urotricha pseudofurcata) and establish gene copy number correction factors to enable highly accurate quantitative abundance estimates. We assess assay performance using controlled laboratory experiments and apply the approach to environmental samples, directly benchmarking dPCR against catalyzed reporter deposition-FISH (CARD-FISH). Under controlled conditions, dPCR and CARD-FISH yielded comparable accuracy, with dPCR showing superior precision. In field applications, method-dependent differences emerged, reflecting both methodological constraints and biological variability. Notably, dPCR provided an overall higher sensitivity, enabling robust detection of low-abundance taxa. Our results highlight dPCR as a scalable and sensitive approach that, when combined with appropriate correction strategies, represents a significant step towards more reliable molecular quantification of protists. At the same time, differences between methods underscore the value of integrating molecular and microscopy-based approaches. We propose that combining dPCR with tools such as CARD-FISH can offer complementary insights into protist population dynamics. Such integrative frameworks provide a powerful path forward for improving abundance estimates and advancing quantitative microbial ecology.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Ecology Resources promotes the creation of comprehensive resources for the scientific community, encompassing computer programs, statistical and molecular advancements, and a diverse array of molecular tools. Serving as a conduit for disseminating these resources, the journal targets a broad audience of researchers in the fields of evolution, ecology, and conservation. Articles in Molecular Ecology Resources are crafted to support investigations tackling significant questions within these disciplines.
In addition to original resource articles, Molecular Ecology Resources features Reviews, Opinions, and Comments relevant to the field. The journal also periodically releases Special Issues focusing on resource development within specific areas.