Stakeholder Perspectives on the Use of Telehealth to Support Deprescribing for Older Patients Transitioning From the Hospital to Home Health Care

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society Pub Date : 2026-08-21 Epub Date: 2026-06-30 DOI:10.1111/jgs.70548
Jinjiao Wang, Jenny Y. Shen, Fang Yu, Sandra F. Simmons, Amanda S. Mixon, Kobi Nathan, Marian S. Moskow, Judith D. Brasch, Sally A. Norton, Kathi L. Heffner, Yun Jiang, Sudha Seshadri, Neela Patel, Lixin Song, Joseph A. Zorek, Christine Lam, Thomas V. Caprio
{"title":"Stakeholder Perspectives on the Use of Telehealth to Support Deprescribing for Older Patients Transitioning From the Hospital to Home Health Care","authors":"Jinjiao Wang,&nbsp;Jenny Y. Shen,&nbsp;Fang Yu,&nbsp;Sandra F. Simmons,&nbsp;Amanda S. Mixon,&nbsp;Kobi Nathan,&nbsp;Marian S. Moskow,&nbsp;Judith D. Brasch,&nbsp;Sally A. Norton,&nbsp;Kathi L. Heffner,&nbsp;Yun Jiang,&nbsp;Sudha Seshadri,&nbsp;Neela Patel,&nbsp;Lixin Song,&nbsp;Joseph A. Zorek,&nbsp;Christine Lam,&nbsp;Thomas V. Caprio","doi":"10.1111/jgs.70548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Multimorbidity affects most older adults in home health care (HHC), leading to inappropriate polypharmacy and increased risks for adverse outcomes. While deprescribing can mitigate these risks, fragmented communication during hospital-to-home transitions remains a major barrier. This study explored stakeholder perspectives on using telehealth to facilitate deprescribing for older adults with multimorbidity while receiving post-acute HHC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 44 stakeholders across 12 U.S. states, including 14 HHC patients and 30 clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and HHC nurses). Guided by the socioecological model of deprescribing, interviews explored factors across individual, interpersonal, organizational, and societal levels associated with telehealth use in deprescribing. Analysis followed a phased, iterative approach with independent double-coding and interprofessional team consensus to ensure credibility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Findings categorized telehealth as a promising tool to align medications with the “4Ms” (Medications, Mentation, Mobility, and What Matters) through goal-concordant deprescribing. At the individual level, stakeholders noted that telehealth readiness depended on patient cognition and digital literacy. At the interpersonal level, telehealth facilitated real-time multidisciplinary “virtual huddles” that reduced communication delays but could occasionally overwhelm patients and may be logistically challenging to schedule. Organizational barriers included reimbursement constraints and complex synchronous scheduling. Societal factors include equitable access for rural or low-income populations, populations who may benefit the most from telehealth-enabled deprescribing due to challenges in accessing care. Stakeholders emphasized a hybrid approach which pairs virtual prescriber consultation with in-home support of a clinician to provide context and assist with implementation for patient-centered deprescribing.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Telehealth can support goal-concordant deprescribing during post-acute care transitions in HHC. A hybrid model, one that combines remote prescriber consultations with in-home clinician support, is the preferred approach to bridge coordination gaps. To maximize impact, future efforts are needed to improve reimbursement, infrastructure, and scheduling to integrate telehealth into routine deprescribing workflows.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"74 8","pages":"2265-2276"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jgs.70548","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.70548","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Multimorbidity affects most older adults in home health care (HHC), leading to inappropriate polypharmacy and increased risks for adverse outcomes. While deprescribing can mitigate these risks, fragmented communication during hospital-to-home transitions remains a major barrier. This study explored stakeholder perspectives on using telehealth to facilitate deprescribing for older adults with multimorbidity while receiving post-acute HHC.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 44 stakeholders across 12 U.S. states, including 14 HHC patients and 30 clinicians (physicians, nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and HHC nurses). Guided by the socioecological model of deprescribing, interviews explored factors across individual, interpersonal, organizational, and societal levels associated with telehealth use in deprescribing. Analysis followed a phased, iterative approach with independent double-coding and interprofessional team consensus to ensure credibility.

Results

Findings categorized telehealth as a promising tool to align medications with the “4Ms” (Medications, Mentation, Mobility, and What Matters) through goal-concordant deprescribing. At the individual level, stakeholders noted that telehealth readiness depended on patient cognition and digital literacy. At the interpersonal level, telehealth facilitated real-time multidisciplinary “virtual huddles” that reduced communication delays but could occasionally overwhelm patients and may be logistically challenging to schedule. Organizational barriers included reimbursement constraints and complex synchronous scheduling. Societal factors include equitable access for rural or low-income populations, populations who may benefit the most from telehealth-enabled deprescribing due to challenges in accessing care. Stakeholders emphasized a hybrid approach which pairs virtual prescriber consultation with in-home support of a clinician to provide context and assist with implementation for patient-centered deprescribing.

Conclusions

Telehealth can support goal-concordant deprescribing during post-acute care transitions in HHC. A hybrid model, one that combines remote prescriber consultations with in-home clinician support, is the preferred approach to bridge coordination gaps. To maximize impact, future efforts are needed to improve reimbursement, infrastructure, and scheduling to integrate telehealth into routine deprescribing workflows.

利益相关者对使用远程医疗支持老年患者从医院向家庭保健过渡的处方的看法。
背景:多病影响家庭保健(HHC)中的大多数老年人,导致不适当的多种用药和不良后果的风险增加。虽然开处方可以减轻这些风险,但在从医院到家庭的过渡过程中,支离破碎的沟通仍然是一个主要障碍。本研究探讨了使用远程医疗的利益相关者观点,以促进在接受急性后HHC治疗时为多病老年人的处方。方法:我们对美国12个国家的44名利益相关者进行了半结构化访谈包括14名HHC患者和30名临床医生(医生、执业护士、药剂师和HHC护士)。在开处方的社会生态学模型的指导下,访谈探讨了与远程医疗使用开处方相关的个人、人际、组织和社会层面的因素。分析遵循分阶段、迭代的方法,采用独立的双重编码和跨专业团队共识来确保可信度。结果:研究结果将远程医疗归类为一种有前途的工具,通过目标一致的处方,将药物与“4Ms”(药物、心理状态、行动能力和重要事项)结合起来。在个人层面,利益攸关方指出,远程保健的准备程度取决于患者的认知和数字素养。在人际层面上,远程医疗促进了实时多学科“虚拟会议”,减少了沟通延迟,但有时可能会使患者不堪重负,并且可能在后勤安排方面具有挑战性。组织障碍包括报销约束和复杂的同步调度。社会因素包括农村或低收入人口获得公平机会,由于在获得保健方面存在挑战,这些人口可能从支持远程保健的处方中获益最多。利益相关者强调了一种混合方法,将虚拟开处方者咨询与临床医生的家庭支持相结合,以提供背景并协助实施以患者为中心的开处方。结论:远程医疗可以支持HHC急症后转诊过程中目标一致的处方。将远程处方咨询与家庭临床医生支持相结合的混合模式是弥合协调差距的首选方法。为了最大限度地发挥影响,未来需要努力改善报销、基础设施和日程安排,将远程保健纳入常规处方工作流程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
504
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书