Digital solutions in acute medicine: Will electronic health records join up the patient journey (soon?).

Future healthcare journal Pub Date : 2026-06-25 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fhj.2026.100538
Christian P Subbe, Anne Kinderlerer, Yogini H Jani
{"title":"Digital solutions in acute medicine: Will electronic health records join up the patient journey (soon?).","authors":"Christian P Subbe, Anne Kinderlerer, Yogini H Jani","doi":"10.1016/j.fhj.2026.100538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute medicine provides care to patients during the first 72 h of their hospital stay. Clinicians face unique challenges of complexity in having to care simultaneously for groups of patients with multiple medical conditions and often complex needs. Digital innovation is central to modern clinical practice, yet its capacity to improve quality of care remains contested. This narrative review explores what acute physicians require from electronic health record (EHR) systems, drawing on evidence from usability studies, implementation evaluations and quality frameworks. Despite substantial investment, evidence of benefits for clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness and user satisfaction remains modest. There is limited research on impact on mortality, efficiency and patient experience. Most research demonstrates inconsistent effects on process and intermediate outcomes such as clinical documentation quality (legibility) or improvements in medication safety. Poor system design based on work as described/imagined, rather than work as actually done, contributes to clinician burnout and undermines system adoption. Despite this, the review identifies good practice examples that show the potential for transformation in this challenging area of medical care. Future progress depends on integrating human factors science, rigorous usability assessment and responsive design. Research will need to evidence equity and sustainability. Acute physicians should 'expect more': systems that provide the right information, in the right context, at the right time - first time.</p>","PeriodicalId":73125,"journal":{"name":"Future healthcare journal","volume":"13 2","pages":"100538"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13316380/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future healthcare journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhj.2026.100538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute medicine provides care to patients during the first 72 h of their hospital stay. Clinicians face unique challenges of complexity in having to care simultaneously for groups of patients with multiple medical conditions and often complex needs. Digital innovation is central to modern clinical practice, yet its capacity to improve quality of care remains contested. This narrative review explores what acute physicians require from electronic health record (EHR) systems, drawing on evidence from usability studies, implementation evaluations and quality frameworks. Despite substantial investment, evidence of benefits for clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness and user satisfaction remains modest. There is limited research on impact on mortality, efficiency and patient experience. Most research demonstrates inconsistent effects on process and intermediate outcomes such as clinical documentation quality (legibility) or improvements in medication safety. Poor system design based on work as described/imagined, rather than work as actually done, contributes to clinician burnout and undermines system adoption. Despite this, the review identifies good practice examples that show the potential for transformation in this challenging area of medical care. Future progress depends on integrating human factors science, rigorous usability assessment and responsive design. Research will need to evidence equity and sustainability. Acute physicians should 'expect more': systems that provide the right information, in the right context, at the right time - first time.

急症医疗的数字化解决方案:电子健康记录是否会加入病人的旅程(很快?)
急诊医学在病人住院的头72小时内提供护理。临床医生面临着复杂的独特挑战,必须同时照顾具有多种医疗条件和通常复杂需求的患者群体。数字创新是现代临床实践的核心,但其提高护理质量的能力仍存在争议。本文从可用性研究、实施评估和质量框架的证据出发,探讨急症医生对电子病历(EHR)系统的需求。尽管有大量投资,但临床结果、成本效益和用户满意度方面的益处证据仍然有限。关于对死亡率、效率和患者体验的影响的研究有限。大多数研究表明对过程和中间结果的影响不一致,如临床文件质量(易读性)或药物安全性的改善。糟糕的系统设计基于描述/想象的工作,而不是实际完成的工作,这会导致临床医生的倦怠,并破坏系统的采用。尽管如此,该审查确定了良好的实践实例,显示了在这一具有挑战性的医疗保健领域进行变革的潜力。未来的发展取决于整合人为因素科学、严格的可用性评估和响应式设计。研究将需要证明公平和可持续性。急症医生应该“期待更多”:在正确的情况下,在正确的时间——第一时间——提供正确信息的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书