Confidence level in diagnosing and treating skin disorders among Palestinian physicians: a cross- sectional study.

IF 2.9 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Hamzeh Yacoub, Lareen Othman, Nataly Jomaa, Yazan Alhabil, Zeena Othman, Mayar Abughosh, Leyan Qasrawi, Silvia Halteh, Francis Daibes, Ahmed Alhaj, Zaid Yacoub
{"title":"Confidence level in diagnosing and treating skin disorders among Palestinian physicians: a cross- sectional study.","authors":"Hamzeh Yacoub, Lareen Othman, Nataly Jomaa, Yazan Alhabil, Zeena Othman, Mayar Abughosh, Leyan Qasrawi, Silvia Halteh, Francis Daibes, Ahmed Alhaj, Zaid Yacoub","doi":"10.1186/s12875-026-03431-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skin disorders are among the most prevalent conditions encountered in primary care, yet dermatology remains underrepresented in medical curricula worldwide. Non-dermatologist physicians frequently manage these conditions with limited training and exposure, potentially compromising diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the level of confidence among Palestinian physicians in diagnosing and managing skin disorders and to identify the training-related factors associated with higher diagnostic self-efficacy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted among 246 licensed medical doctors practicing in the West Bank, Palestine. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling via professional networks and selected healthcare facilities, with the sample predominantly comprising younger and early-career physicians. Data were collected using a structured, validated self-administered questionnaire through mixed modes (electronic and paper-based). The instrument assessed sociodemographic and professional characteristics, dermatology exposure and training, and diagnostic self-efficacy using Likert-scale items. Diagnostic self-efficacy was dichotomized into below average versus average or above. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression were performed using SPSS version 22. Ethical approval was obtained from AlQuds University Institutional Review Board.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 246 participating physicians, 74.4% were aged 30 years or younger and 58.9% were male. The majority were general practitioners (54.1%) working in hospital settings (79.7%). Most participants (58.9%) reported no formal dermatology training, and 42.3% encountered fewer than 10 dermatological cases in their careers. Most physicians rated their diagnostic skills as average (62.6%), with a mean diagnostic self-efficacy score of 2.92 ± 0.78. No meaningful associations were observed between most sociodemographic characteristics and diagnostic self- efficacy. Training-related factors significantly associated with higher self-efficacy included: dermatology training during medical school (81.2% vs. 64.3%; p = 0.038), exposure to more than three training methods (91.6% vs. 73.3%; p = 0.006), and confidence gained after training (85.6% vs. 63.9%; p = 0.003). In multivariable logistic regression, confidence after training remained an independent predictor of higher self-efficacy (OR = 3.21, 95% CI 1.29-8.11; p = 0.011). Dermatology rotations and lectures were identified as the most effective and most recommended training modalities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Palestinian physicians demonstrate only moderate diagnostic self-efficacy in dermatology, largely attributable to limited training and clinical exposure. Dermatology training, particularly when it meaningfully boosts confidence, is the most important predictor of diagnostic self-efficacy, irrespective of sociodemographic background. Integrating structured, multimodal dermatology education into undergraduate and postgraduate curricula is essential to improving physician competence and ultimately enhancing patient care in primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13591905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-026-03431-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Skin disorders are among the most prevalent conditions encountered in primary care, yet dermatology remains underrepresented in medical curricula worldwide. Non-dermatologist physicians frequently manage these conditions with limited training and exposure, potentially compromising diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess the level of confidence among Palestinian physicians in diagnosing and managing skin disorders and to identify the training-related factors associated with higher diagnostic self-efficacy.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 246 licensed medical doctors practicing in the West Bank, Palestine. Participants were recruited through convenience sampling via professional networks and selected healthcare facilities, with the sample predominantly comprising younger and early-career physicians. Data were collected using a structured, validated self-administered questionnaire through mixed modes (electronic and paper-based). The instrument assessed sociodemographic and professional characteristics, dermatology exposure and training, and diagnostic self-efficacy using Likert-scale items. Diagnostic self-efficacy was dichotomized into below average versus average or above. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and multivariable logistic regression were performed using SPSS version 22. Ethical approval was obtained from AlQuds University Institutional Review Board.

Results: Of 246 participating physicians, 74.4% were aged 30 years or younger and 58.9% were male. The majority were general practitioners (54.1%) working in hospital settings (79.7%). Most participants (58.9%) reported no formal dermatology training, and 42.3% encountered fewer than 10 dermatological cases in their careers. Most physicians rated their diagnostic skills as average (62.6%), with a mean diagnostic self-efficacy score of 2.92 ± 0.78. No meaningful associations were observed between most sociodemographic characteristics and diagnostic self- efficacy. Training-related factors significantly associated with higher self-efficacy included: dermatology training during medical school (81.2% vs. 64.3%; p = 0.038), exposure to more than three training methods (91.6% vs. 73.3%; p = 0.006), and confidence gained after training (85.6% vs. 63.9%; p = 0.003). In multivariable logistic regression, confidence after training remained an independent predictor of higher self-efficacy (OR = 3.21, 95% CI 1.29-8.11; p = 0.011). Dermatology rotations and lectures were identified as the most effective and most recommended training modalities.

Conclusions: Palestinian physicians demonstrate only moderate diagnostic self-efficacy in dermatology, largely attributable to limited training and clinical exposure. Dermatology training, particularly when it meaningfully boosts confidence, is the most important predictor of diagnostic self-efficacy, irrespective of sociodemographic background. Integrating structured, multimodal dermatology education into undergraduate and postgraduate curricula is essential to improving physician competence and ultimately enhancing patient care in primary care settings.

巴勒斯坦医生诊断和治疗皮肤病的信心水平:一项横断面研究。
背景:皮肤病是初级保健中遇到的最普遍的疾病之一,但皮肤科在世界范围内的医学课程中仍然代表性不足。非皮肤科医生经常在有限的培训和接触的情况下处理这些疾病,这可能会损害诊断的准确性和患者的预后。本研究旨在评估巴勒斯坦医生在诊断和管理皮肤病方面的信心水平,并确定与较高诊断自我效能相关的培训相关因素。方法:在巴勒斯坦西岸执业的246名有执照的医生中进行了一项横断面研究。参与者通过专业网络和选定的医疗机构通过方便抽样招募,样本主要由年轻和早期职业医生组成。通过混合模式(电子和纸质)使用结构化、有效的自我管理问卷收集数据。该工具使用李克特量表项目评估社会人口统计学和专业特征、皮肤病学暴露和培训以及诊断自我效能。诊断性自我效能分为中下与中上。使用SPSS version 22进行描述性统计、卡方检验和多变量logistic回归。获得了AlQuds大学机构审查委员会的伦理批准。结果:246名参与调查的医生中,年龄在30岁及以下的占74.4%,男性占58.9%。大多数是在医院工作的全科医生(54.1%)(79.7%)。大多数参与者(58.9%)报告没有接受过正式的皮肤科培训,42.3%的人在其职业生涯中遇到的皮肤病病例少于10例。大多数医生对诊断技能的评价为一般(62.6%),平均诊断自我效能得分为2.92±0.78。在大多数社会人口学特征和诊断自我效能之间没有观察到有意义的关联。与较高自我效能显著相关的培训相关因素包括:医学院期间的皮肤病学培训(81.2%比64.3%,p = 0.038),接触三种以上的培训方法(91.6%比73.3%,p = 0.006),以及培训后获得的信心(85.6%比63.9%,p = 0.003)。在多变量logistic回归中,训练后的信心仍然是较高自我效能的独立预测因子(OR = 3.21, 95% CI 1.29-8.11; p = 0.011)。皮肤科轮转和讲座被认为是最有效和最推荐的培训方式。结论:巴勒斯坦医生在皮肤科仅表现出中等程度的诊断自我效能感,主要归因于有限的培训和临床暴露。无论社会人口背景如何,皮肤科培训是诊断自我效能最重要的预测指标,尤其是当它有意地增强自信时。将结构化的、多模式的皮肤病学教育整合到本科和研究生课程中,对于提高医生的能力和最终加强初级保健环境中的患者护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书