{"title":"Dryness Response of the Ocular Surface With Use of Wearable Ventilation for Improving Air Quality and Comfort","authors":"Xiaobin Wei, Huijuan Yin, Yiqun Hu, Guozhen Niu, Hetang Wang, Jun Gao","doi":"10.1016/j.shaw.2026.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Wearable ventilation paradigms have been increasingly proposed for various polluted workplaces due to its effectiveness in improving air quality and comfort but the impact of air movement on eye dryness has not been adequately addressed.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This study investigated the subjective perceptions and objective ocular surface dryness responses of 12 participants in a wearable ventilation environment. Experiments were conducted under three thermal conditions: isothermal air supply at 26°C, isothermal air supply at 32°C, and cool air supply at 32°C.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The perceived air quality improved continuously with increasing air supply time. Thermal acceptability in hot environments was significantly enhanced after ventilation. Participants found the experimental air velocity range of 1.0–1.6 m/s and the associated eye dryness to be acceptable. However, objective measurements revealed that after air supply, blinking frequency increased by 25–60%, tear film break-up time decreased by 30–43%, and the ocular surface discomfort index increased. Ophthalmologists indicated these changes signify a health risk for dry eye syndrome.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results highlight potential health risks under current wearable ventilation environments and subjective assessments method for air movement acceptability. These findings have important implications for the design and implementation of wearable ventilation systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56149,"journal":{"name":"Safety and Health at Work","volume":"17 2","pages":"Pages 206-213"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13315986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety and Health at Work","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2093791126000107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Wearable ventilation paradigms have been increasingly proposed for various polluted workplaces due to its effectiveness in improving air quality and comfort but the impact of air movement on eye dryness has not been adequately addressed.
Methods
This study investigated the subjective perceptions and objective ocular surface dryness responses of 12 participants in a wearable ventilation environment. Experiments were conducted under three thermal conditions: isothermal air supply at 26°C, isothermal air supply at 32°C, and cool air supply at 32°C.
Results
The perceived air quality improved continuously with increasing air supply time. Thermal acceptability in hot environments was significantly enhanced after ventilation. Participants found the experimental air velocity range of 1.0–1.6 m/s and the associated eye dryness to be acceptable. However, objective measurements revealed that after air supply, blinking frequency increased by 25–60%, tear film break-up time decreased by 30–43%, and the ocular surface discomfort index increased. Ophthalmologists indicated these changes signify a health risk for dry eye syndrome.
Conclusion
The results highlight potential health risks under current wearable ventilation environments and subjective assessments method for air movement acceptability. These findings have important implications for the design and implementation of wearable ventilation systems.
期刊介绍:
Safety and Health at Work (SH@W) is an international, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal published quarterly in English beginning in 2010. The journal is aimed at providing grounds for the exchange of ideas and data developed through research experience in the broad field of occupational health and safety. Articles may deal with scientific research to improve workers'' health and safety by eliminating occupational accidents and diseases, pursuing a better working life, and creating a safe and comfortable working environment. The journal focuses primarily on original articles across the whole scope of occupational health and safety, but also welcomes up-to-date review papers and short communications and commentaries on urgent issues and case studies on unique epidemiological survey, methods of accident investigation, and analysis. High priority will be given to articles on occupational epidemiology, medicine, hygiene, toxicology, nursing and health services, work safety, ergonomics, work organization, engineering of safety (mechanical, electrical, chemical, and construction), safety management and policy, and studies related to economic evaluation and its social policy and organizational aspects. Its abbreviated title is Saf Health Work.