Are preoperative psychological factors associated with chronic postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Julie Heegaard, Julius Tetens Hald, Michael Mørk Petersen, Anders Odgaard
{"title":"Are preoperative psychological factors associated with chronic postoperative pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review.","authors":"Julie Heegaard, Julius Tetens Hald, Michael Mørk Petersen, Anders Odgaard","doi":"10.1530/EOR-2025-0269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine whether psychological factors are associated with chronic postoperative pain ≥12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), given that ∼10% of patients report persistent pain despite otherwise successful surgery, and psychological influences are proposed contributors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, including adults undergoing primary or revision TKA with postoperative pain assessed at a minimum of one year. Searches were performed in MEDLINE and Embase. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024620401). Due to substantial heterogeneity in the studies, findings were synthesised narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven studies met eligibility criteria. Twelve psychological factors were assessed across studies, most frequently depressive symptoms, pain catastrophising, and anxiety. Results were inconsistent, and no psychological factor showed a reproducible association with long-term postoperative pain across studies. Expectations were the only factor consistently associated with pain outcomes, while self-efficacy showed no association. Other factors, such as kinesiophobia and psychological distress, were examined in too few studies to support firm interpretation. Most studies demonstrated a moderate risk of bias, primarily due to reliance on self-reported measures and lack of non-exposed comparison cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Substantial heterogeneity across studies limits firm conclusions regarding the influence of psychological factors on chronic postoperative pain one year after TKA. Patient expectations may play a meaningful role, whereas self-efficacy appears unrelated. Overall, most patients experienced pain improvement regardless of psychological profile. Standardised assessment methods are needed to clarify these associations and guide clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"11 7","pages":"803-814"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13326883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2025-0269","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine whether psychological factors are associated with chronic postoperative pain ≥12 months after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), given that ∼10% of patients report persistent pain despite otherwise successful surgery, and psychological influences are proposed contributors.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, including adults undergoing primary or revision TKA with postoperative pain assessed at a minimum of one year. Searches were performed in MEDLINE and Embase. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024620401). Due to substantial heterogeneity in the studies, findings were synthesised narratively.

Results: Thirty-seven studies met eligibility criteria. Twelve psychological factors were assessed across studies, most frequently depressive symptoms, pain catastrophising, and anxiety. Results were inconsistent, and no psychological factor showed a reproducible association with long-term postoperative pain across studies. Expectations were the only factor consistently associated with pain outcomes, while self-efficacy showed no association. Other factors, such as kinesiophobia and psychological distress, were examined in too few studies to support firm interpretation. Most studies demonstrated a moderate risk of bias, primarily due to reliance on self-reported measures and lack of non-exposed comparison cohorts.

Conclusion: Substantial heterogeneity across studies limits firm conclusions regarding the influence of psychological factors on chronic postoperative pain one year after TKA. Patient expectations may play a meaningful role, whereas self-efficacy appears unrelated. Overall, most patients experienced pain improvement regardless of psychological profile. Standardised assessment methods are needed to clarify these associations and guide clinical practice.

术前心理因素是否与全膝关节置换术后慢性术后疼痛相关:一项系统综述。
目的:研究心理因素是否与全膝关节置换术(TKA)后≥12个月的慢性术后疼痛相关,考虑到约10%的患者报告尽管手术成功,但仍存在持续疼痛,并且心理因素被认为是影响因素。方法:根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价,包括接受原发性或改进性TKA的成人,术后疼痛评估至少一年。在MEDLINE和Embase中进行检索。偏倚风险采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表进行评估。协议注册到PROSPERO (CRD42024620401)。由于研究中存在大量的异质性,研究结果以叙述的方式综合。结果:37项研究符合入选标准。在研究中评估了12种心理因素,最常见的是抑郁症状、疼痛灾难和焦虑。结果不一致,在所有研究中,没有心理因素显示与长期术后疼痛有可重复的关联。期望是唯一与疼痛结果一致相关的因素,而自我效能感则没有关联。其他因素,如运动恐惧症和心理困扰,在很少的研究中得到检验,无法支持坚定的解释。大多数研究显示有中等偏倚风险,主要是由于依赖于自我报告的测量和缺乏非暴露的比较队列。结论:研究间的异质性限制了关于心理因素对TKA术后1年慢性疼痛影响的确切结论。患者期望可能发挥有意义的作用,而自我效能似乎无关。总的来说,无论心理状况如何,大多数患者都经历了疼痛的改善。需要标准化的评估方法来澄清这些关联并指导临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书