Giancarlo De la Torre Canales, Marie-Amélie Dureisseix, Thiago Germano Dos Santos, Pedro Miguel Teixeira Carvas Cebola, Glauce Crivelaro do Nascimento, Tatiana Foscaldo, Rodrigo Lorenzi Poluha, Justin Durham, Nikolaos Christidis
{"title":"Botulinum Toxin Type A for Trigeminal and Postherpetic Neuralgia: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.","authors":"Giancarlo De la Torre Canales, Marie-Amélie Dureisseix, Thiago Germano Dos Santos, Pedro Miguel Teixeira Carvas Cebola, Glauce Crivelaro do Nascimento, Tatiana Foscaldo, Rodrigo Lorenzi Poluha, Justin Durham, Nikolaos Christidis","doi":"10.1007/s40265-026-02352-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) are severe peripheral neuropathic pain conditions associated with substantial functional impairment. Although pharmacological treatments are available, many patients experience insufficient efficacy or poor tolerability. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) has emerged as a potential treatment, but uncertainties remain regarding its efficacy, safety, and clinical positioning. This umbrella review aimed to synthesise evidence from systematic reviews evaluating BoNT-A in TN and PHN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception to November 2025. Systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis evaluating BoNT-A in adults with TN or PHN were included. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, and only moderate- or high-quality reviews were included. Primary outcomes were pain intensity reduction and responder rates (≥ 50% pain reduction). Secondary outcomes included quality of life and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten systematic reviews (2015-2024) met the inclusion criteria. Botulinum toxin type A was consistently associated with reductions in pain intensity and higher responder rates than placebo, particularly in TN. In PHN, evidence was more limited but supported short-term (1-3 months) improvements in pain intensity. Evidence on quality of life was scarce and inconclusive. Botulinum toxin type A was well tolerated, with mostly mild and transient adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Botulinum toxin type A appears to provide short-term pain relief in selected patients with TN and PHN and is generally well tolerated. Current evidence supports its role as an adjunctive third-line option for focal peripheral neuropathic pain, although heterogeneity and limited long-term data warrant cautious interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":11482,"journal":{"name":"Drugs","volume":" ","pages":"1339-1364"},"PeriodicalIF":14.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13375694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-026-02352-8","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) are severe peripheral neuropathic pain conditions associated with substantial functional impairment. Although pharmacological treatments are available, many patients experience insufficient efficacy or poor tolerability. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) has emerged as a potential treatment, but uncertainties remain regarding its efficacy, safety, and clinical positioning. This umbrella review aimed to synthesise evidence from systematic reviews evaluating BoNT-A in TN and PHN.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception to November 2025. Systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis evaluating BoNT-A in adults with TN or PHN were included. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR-2, and only moderate- or high-quality reviews were included. Primary outcomes were pain intensity reduction and responder rates (≥ 50% pain reduction). Secondary outcomes included quality of life and adverse events.
Results: Ten systematic reviews (2015-2024) met the inclusion criteria. Botulinum toxin type A was consistently associated with reductions in pain intensity and higher responder rates than placebo, particularly in TN. In PHN, evidence was more limited but supported short-term (1-3 months) improvements in pain intensity. Evidence on quality of life was scarce and inconclusive. Botulinum toxin type A was well tolerated, with mostly mild and transient adverse events.
Conclusions: Botulinum toxin type A appears to provide short-term pain relief in selected patients with TN and PHN and is generally well tolerated. Current evidence supports its role as an adjunctive third-line option for focal peripheral neuropathic pain, although heterogeneity and limited long-term data warrant cautious interpretation.
背景与目的:三叉神经痛(TN)和带状疱疹后神经痛(PHN)是一种严重的周围神经性疼痛,伴有严重的功能障碍。虽然药物治疗是可用的,但许多患者的疗效不足或耐受性差。A型肉毒毒素(BoNT-A)已成为一种潜在的治疗方法,但其有效性、安全性和临床定位仍不确定。本综述旨在综合评估TN和PHN中BoNT-A的系统综述证据。方法:系统检索MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和CINAHL自成立至2025年11月的文献。纳入有或没有荟萃分析评估成人TN或PHN BoNT-A的系统综述。使用AMSTAR-2评估方法学质量,仅包括中等或高质量的评价。主要结局是疼痛强度降低和缓解率(疼痛减轻≥50%)。次要结局包括生活质量和不良事件。结果:10篇系统评价(2015-2024)符合纳入标准。与安慰剂相比,A型肉毒杆菌毒素始终与疼痛强度的减轻和更高的反应率相关,特别是在TN中。在PHN中,证据更有限,但支持短期(1-3个月)疼痛强度的改善。关于生活质量的证据很少,也没有定论。A型肉毒杆菌毒素耐受性良好,主要是轻微和短暂的不良事件。结论:A型肉毒杆菌毒素似乎可以短期缓解TN和PHN患者的疼痛,并且通常耐受性良好。目前的证据支持其作为局灶性周围神经性疼痛的辅助三线选择,尽管异质性和有限的长期数据需要谨慎解释。
期刊介绍:
Drugs is a journal that aims to enhance pharmacotherapy by publishing review and original research articles on key aspects of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. The journal includes:
Leading/current opinion articles providing an overview of contentious or emerging issues.
Definitive reviews of drugs and drug classes, and their place in disease management.
Therapy in Practice articles including recommendations for specific clinical situations.
High-quality, well designed, original clinical research.
Adis Drug Evaluations reviewing the properties and place in therapy of both newer and established drugs.
AdisInsight Reports summarising development at first global approval.
Moreover, the journal offers additional digital features such as animated abstracts, video abstracts, instructional videos, and podcasts to increase visibility and educational value. Plain language summaries accompany articles to assist readers with some knowledge of the field in understanding important medical advances.