A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Lumateperone in the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jon E Grant, Sophie Boutouis, Laurie Avila, Megha Neelapu, Dustin Ehsan
{"title":"A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Lumateperone in the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder.","authors":"Jon E Grant, Sophie Boutouis, Laurie Avila, Megha Neelapu, Dustin Ehsan","doi":"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with psychosocial dysfunction and has a number of untoward public health associations. There is no established first-line pharmacological treatment for BPD, and available options are not suitable for all individuals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lumateperone in adults with BPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty adults with BPD were recruited for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants received 8-week treatment with lumateperone (42 mg/day) or identical placebo in a parallel design. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the clinician-rated Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD). Safety data were collected. Effects of active versus placebo treatment were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects regression model that included terms for treatment group, time, and treatment-by-time interaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant interaction between treatment and time on the ZAN-BPD scale at week 8. Lumateperone was generally well tolerated. Secondary measures did not result in statistically significant differences from placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lumateperone did not appear to reduce BPD symptoms compared with placebo. These findings also need to be viewed cautiously given the small sample size, large drop-out rate, and robust placebo response.</p>","PeriodicalId":10449,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000693","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is associated with psychosocial dysfunction and has a number of untoward public health associations. There is no established first-line pharmacological treatment for BPD, and available options are not suitable for all individuals. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lumateperone in adults with BPD.

Methods: Sixty adults with BPD were recruited for a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Participants received 8-week treatment with lumateperone (42 mg/day) or identical placebo in a parallel design. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the clinician-rated Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder (ZAN-BPD). Safety data were collected. Effects of active versus placebo treatment were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects regression model that included terms for treatment group, time, and treatment-by-time interaction.

Results: There was no significant interaction between treatment and time on the ZAN-BPD scale at week 8. Lumateperone was generally well tolerated. Secondary measures did not result in statistically significant differences from placebo.

Conclusions: Lumateperone did not appear to reduce BPD symptoms compared with placebo. These findings also need to be viewed cautiously given the small sample size, large drop-out rate, and robust placebo response.

Lumateperone治疗边缘型人格障碍的双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
目的:边缘型人格障碍(BPD)与社会心理功能障碍有关,并具有许多不利的公共卫生关联。目前还没有确定的BPD的一线药物治疗方法,可用的选择并不适合所有个体。本研究的目的是评估lumateperone对成年BPD患者的安全性和有效性。方法:招募60名成年BPD患者进行随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。参与者在平行设计中接受8周的lumateperone(42毫克/天)或相同的安慰剂治疗。主要疗效指标是临床评定的扎纳里尼边缘型人格障碍评定量表(Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder, ZAN-BPD)。收集了安全数据。使用线性混合效应回归模型分析积极治疗与安慰剂治疗的效果,该模型包括治疗组、时间和每次治疗的相互作用。结果:在第8周的ZAN-BPD量表上,治疗和时间之间没有显著的相互作用。Lumateperone总体耐受良好。次要测量结果与安慰剂没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:与安慰剂相比,Lumateperone似乎没有减轻BPD症状。考虑到样本量小,退出率大,安慰剂反应强,这些发现也需要谨慎看待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropharmacology
Clinical Neuropharmacology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuropharmacology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the pharmacology of the nervous system in its broadest sense. Coverage ranges from such basic aspects as mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, to practical clinical problems such as drug interactions, drug toxicity, and therapy for specific syndromes and symptoms. The journal publishes original articles and brief reports, invited and submitted reviews, and letters to the editor. A regular feature is the Patient Management Series: in-depth case presentations with clinical questions and answers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书