Real-world effectiveness of guselkumab for induction of remission in Crohn's disease: a prospective multicenter cohort study with propensity score-matched comparison to risankizumab.
Maitha Al Hosani, Noorah Al Hosani, Mohamed Nasir Alzaabi, Maryam A Alahmad, Nadeen Mamon Omar, Camille Conde Oribiana, Enas Fouad Ahmed, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Kishore Kumar Chitra Kumar, Sofia Hanif, Khalid Izzeldin Elfatih Barakat, Khalid Osman Elamin Elsayed, Mohammed Nabil Quraishi
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness of guselkumab for induction of remission in Crohn's disease: a prospective multicenter cohort study with propensity score-matched comparison to risankizumab.","authors":"Maitha Al Hosani, Noorah Al Hosani, Mohamed Nasir Alzaabi, Maryam A Alahmad, Nadeen Mamon Omar, Camille Conde Oribiana, Enas Fouad Ahmed, Ishtiaq Ahmed, Kishore Kumar Chitra Kumar, Sofia Hanif, Khalid Izzeldin Elfatih Barakat, Khalid Osman Elamin Elsayed, Mohammed Nabil Quraishi","doi":"10.1093/crocol/otag061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>No head-to-head trials compare selective interleukin-23 inhibitors in Crohn's disease (CD), leaving clinicians without direct evidence to guide treatment selection. We aimed to evaluate the real-world induction effectiveness of guselkumab in CD and perform propensity score-matched (PSM) comparisons against risankizumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective multicenter study included adults with moderate-to-severe CD initiating guselkumab in the United Arab Emirates. The primary outcome was clinical remission at Week 12 (Harvey-Bradshaw Index <5). Full propensity score matching between guselkumab and risankizumab cohorts controlled for 12 covariates, including disease phenotype, baseline endoscopic and biochemical activity, surgical history, and current smoking status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one guselkumab and 60 risankizumab patients were included. In the guselkumab cohort, 71% were advanced therapy-exposed with a median of 2 prior advanced therapies. At Week 12, clinical remission was achieved in 51% (26/51) and clinical response in 86% (44/51). Median C-reactive protein (CRP) decreased from 8.5 to 3.0 mg/L (<i>P</i> = .002) and fecal calprotectin from 216 to 80 μg/g (<i>P</i> < .001). Effectiveness was consistent regardless of prior treatment history. On univariable analysis, higher baseline HBI (OR 0.77, <i>P</i> = .011), SES-CD (OR 0.87, <i>P</i> = .049), and CRP (OR 0.94, <i>P</i> = .019) were associated with lower remission likelihood. Maintenance dosing was 100 mg Q8W in 73% and 200 mg Q4W in 27%. PSM analysis demonstrated comparable clinical remission (51% vs 50%, <i>P</i> > 0.9) and clinical response (86% vs 87%, <i>P</i> = .87) between guselkumab and risankizumab, with no significant between-group biomarker differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Guselkumab demonstrated robust real-world induction effectiveness comparable to risankizumab across clinical and biochemical outcomes. These findings warrant confirmation in larger, longer-term comparative studies with endoscopic endpoints.</p>","PeriodicalId":10847,"journal":{"name":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","volume":"8 2","pages":"otag061"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13316425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crohn's & Colitis 360","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/crocol/otag061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: No head-to-head trials compare selective interleukin-23 inhibitors in Crohn's disease (CD), leaving clinicians without direct evidence to guide treatment selection. We aimed to evaluate the real-world induction effectiveness of guselkumab in CD and perform propensity score-matched (PSM) comparisons against risankizumab.
Methods: This prospective multicenter study included adults with moderate-to-severe CD initiating guselkumab in the United Arab Emirates. The primary outcome was clinical remission at Week 12 (Harvey-Bradshaw Index <5). Full propensity score matching between guselkumab and risankizumab cohorts controlled for 12 covariates, including disease phenotype, baseline endoscopic and biochemical activity, surgical history, and current smoking status.
Results: Fifty-one guselkumab and 60 risankizumab patients were included. In the guselkumab cohort, 71% were advanced therapy-exposed with a median of 2 prior advanced therapies. At Week 12, clinical remission was achieved in 51% (26/51) and clinical response in 86% (44/51). Median C-reactive protein (CRP) decreased from 8.5 to 3.0 mg/L (P = .002) and fecal calprotectin from 216 to 80 μg/g (P < .001). Effectiveness was consistent regardless of prior treatment history. On univariable analysis, higher baseline HBI (OR 0.77, P = .011), SES-CD (OR 0.87, P = .049), and CRP (OR 0.94, P = .019) were associated with lower remission likelihood. Maintenance dosing was 100 mg Q8W in 73% and 200 mg Q4W in 27%. PSM analysis demonstrated comparable clinical remission (51% vs 50%, P > 0.9) and clinical response (86% vs 87%, P = .87) between guselkumab and risankizumab, with no significant between-group biomarker differences.
Conclusions: Guselkumab demonstrated robust real-world induction effectiveness comparable to risankizumab across clinical and biochemical outcomes. These findings warrant confirmation in larger, longer-term comparative studies with endoscopic endpoints.