Airam Rodríguez, Juan Carlos Rando, Beneharo Rodríguez
{"title":"Cat colonies reshape the abundance and body size of lizards.","authors":"Airam Rodríguez, Juan Carlos Rando, Beneharo Rodríguez","doi":"10.1098/rsbl.2026.0195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The cat (Felis catus) is one of the worst invasive species, with well-documented impacts on biodiversity, especially on islands. Despite this, local administrations commonly implement trap-neuter-return (TNR) programmes to manage free-roaming cat populations. Here, we assess the effects of cat colonies on the endemic Tenerife lizard (Gallotia galloti). We used fruit-baited pitfall traps placed near and away from cat colonies to estimate lizard abundance and collect biometric data. Lizard abundance was lower near cat colonies compared with nearby control areas. Moreover, the individuals captured close to the colonies were smaller. Measurements of lizard carcasses found near colonies indicate that cats preferentially prey on larger individuals, explaining both their reduced abundance and their smaller body size. Interestingly, despite their smaller size, lizards near cat colonies presented higher scaled mass index values. Stable isotope analyses (δ13C and δ15N) of faecal samples suggest that these lizards partially rely on dried cat food available within colonies. Overall, cat colonies significantly altered lizard abundance, size structure and body condition. Given the ecological importance of G. galloti as both a seed disperser and prey, our findings highlight the need to limit the spread of free-roaming cat colonies, particularly in protected areas, to mitigate the effects on native biodiversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9005,"journal":{"name":"Biology Letters","volume":"22 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2026.0195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The cat (Felis catus) is one of the worst invasive species, with well-documented impacts on biodiversity, especially on islands. Despite this, local administrations commonly implement trap-neuter-return (TNR) programmes to manage free-roaming cat populations. Here, we assess the effects of cat colonies on the endemic Tenerife lizard (Gallotia galloti). We used fruit-baited pitfall traps placed near and away from cat colonies to estimate lizard abundance and collect biometric data. Lizard abundance was lower near cat colonies compared with nearby control areas. Moreover, the individuals captured close to the colonies were smaller. Measurements of lizard carcasses found near colonies indicate that cats preferentially prey on larger individuals, explaining both their reduced abundance and their smaller body size. Interestingly, despite their smaller size, lizards near cat colonies presented higher scaled mass index values. Stable isotope analyses (δ13C and δ15N) of faecal samples suggest that these lizards partially rely on dried cat food available within colonies. Overall, cat colonies significantly altered lizard abundance, size structure and body condition. Given the ecological importance of G. galloti as both a seed disperser and prey, our findings highlight the need to limit the spread of free-roaming cat colonies, particularly in protected areas, to mitigate the effects on native biodiversity.
期刊介绍:
Previously a supplement to Proceedings B, and launched as an independent journal in 2005, Biology Letters is a primarily online, peer-reviewed journal that publishes short, high-quality articles, reviews and opinion pieces from across the biological sciences. The scope of Biology Letters is vast - publishing high-quality research in any area of the biological sciences. However, we have particular strengths in the biology, evolution and ecology of whole organisms. We also publish in other areas of biology, such as molecular ecology and evolution, environmental science, and phylogenetics.