Daniel Lindsay, Louisa G. Collins, Catherine M. Olsen, Nirmala Pandeya, David C. Whiteman
{"title":"The costs of diagnosing and treating skin cancer: Findings from the QSkin Study","authors":"Daniel Lindsay, Louisa G. Collins, Catherine M. Olsen, Nirmala Pandeya, David C. Whiteman","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2026.100326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To estimate the proportion of all healthcare expenses attributable to diagnosing and managing skin cancer in a large, population-based cohort, and identify characteristics of high users of skin cancer services.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A prospective cohort study of 40,338 Queensland residents with linked healthcare data from the Medical Benefits Scheme (MBS), Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and Queensland Hospital Admitted Patient Data Collection databases. We quantified the frequency of use and healthcare costs (out-of-pocket and government) for MBS services, PBS services and hospital admissions related to skin cancer.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Over an average of 8.5 years follow-up, 71% (n=28,498) of participants used 245,919 skin cancer services, costing the government approximately $43.1 million (2.4% of all health service costs). In total, 51% (n=20,548) of participants had ≥1 skin biopsy, 36% (n=14,458) had ≥1 keratinocyte cancer excision and 8% (n=3,226) had hospital admissions. Out of the total government or out-of-pocket costs for skin cancer services, 44% and 41% were for keratinocyte cancer excisions, respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Services for diagnosing and treating skin cancer accounted for 2.4% of all direct health service costs in this Queensland cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Public Health</h3><div>As skin cancer is largely preventable, investing in enhanced primary prevention efforts may mitigate these significant burdens.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"50 4","pages":"Article 100326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020026000154","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To estimate the proportion of all healthcare expenses attributable to diagnosing and managing skin cancer in a large, population-based cohort, and identify characteristics of high users of skin cancer services.
Methods
A prospective cohort study of 40,338 Queensland residents with linked healthcare data from the Medical Benefits Scheme (MBS), Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) and Queensland Hospital Admitted Patient Data Collection databases. We quantified the frequency of use and healthcare costs (out-of-pocket and government) for MBS services, PBS services and hospital admissions related to skin cancer.
Results
Over an average of 8.5 years follow-up, 71% (n=28,498) of participants used 245,919 skin cancer services, costing the government approximately $43.1 million (2.4% of all health service costs). In total, 51% (n=20,548) of participants had ≥1 skin biopsy, 36% (n=14,458) had ≥1 keratinocyte cancer excision and 8% (n=3,226) had hospital admissions. Out of the total government or out-of-pocket costs for skin cancer services, 44% and 41% were for keratinocyte cancer excisions, respectively.
Conclusions
Services for diagnosing and treating skin cancer accounted for 2.4% of all direct health service costs in this Queensland cohort.
Implications for Public Health
As skin cancer is largely preventable, investing in enhanced primary prevention efforts may mitigate these significant burdens.
期刊介绍:
The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.