Incidence of Nasogastric Tube-Related Pressure Injuries in Intensive Care Unit and Internal Medicine Ward.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Michael Kuniavsky, Anatoly Bronshtein, Evgeny Vilenchik, Elina Lubenets, Miri Kagan, Natasha Shepelevich, Nika Gorkliansky
{"title":"Incidence of Nasogastric Tube-Related Pressure Injuries in Intensive Care Unit and Internal Medicine Ward.","authors":"Michael Kuniavsky, Anatoly Bronshtein, Evgeny Vilenchik, Elina Lubenets, Miri Kagan, Natasha Shepelevich, Nika Gorkliansky","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2026583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Incidence data for medical device-related pressure injuries caused by nasogastric tubes are limited. Rates may be higher in intensive care units (ICUs) than internal medicine wards because of the increased vulnerability of ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine incidence and contributing factors of nasogastric tube-related pressure injuries among ICU and internal medicine ward patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study included adults admitted to the ICU or internal medicine ward with a nasogastric tube placed during or within 4 hours before admission. Patients with facial injuries, wounds, or ulcers were excluded. Patients were monitored daily for nasogastric tube-related pressure injuries; location and stage of pressure injuries were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data were collected July 2022 to July 2024 in the ICU (88 patients) and internal medicine ward (48 patients) of a 900-bed general medical center. The nasogastric tube-related pressure injury incidence was significantly lower in the ICU (4 patients; 0.47 per 100 patient-days) than in the internal medicine ward (13 patients; 3.02 per 100 patientdays) (P < .001). Charlson Comorbidity Index was higher in internal medicine ward patients than ICU patients (mean [SD], 7.7 [2.39] vs 3 [2.41]; P = .02). Nasogastric tube fixation methods differed between departments.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unlike previous reports, nasogastric tube- related pressure injury incidence was higher in the internal medicine ward than the ICU. Possible contributors include comorbidity burden, nurse to patient ratios, and nasogastric tube fixation techniques. These confounding variables warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"35 4","pages":"268-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2026583","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Incidence data for medical device-related pressure injuries caused by nasogastric tubes are limited. Rates may be higher in intensive care units (ICUs) than internal medicine wards because of the increased vulnerability of ICU patients.

Objective: To determine incidence and contributing factors of nasogastric tube-related pressure injuries among ICU and internal medicine ward patients.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included adults admitted to the ICU or internal medicine ward with a nasogastric tube placed during or within 4 hours before admission. Patients with facial injuries, wounds, or ulcers were excluded. Patients were monitored daily for nasogastric tube-related pressure injuries; location and stage of pressure injuries were documented.

Results: Data were collected July 2022 to July 2024 in the ICU (88 patients) and internal medicine ward (48 patients) of a 900-bed general medical center. The nasogastric tube-related pressure injury incidence was significantly lower in the ICU (4 patients; 0.47 per 100 patient-days) than in the internal medicine ward (13 patients; 3.02 per 100 patientdays) (P < .001). Charlson Comorbidity Index was higher in internal medicine ward patients than ICU patients (mean [SD], 7.7 [2.39] vs 3 [2.41]; P = .02). Nasogastric tube fixation methods differed between departments.

Conclusions: Unlike previous reports, nasogastric tube- related pressure injury incidence was higher in the internal medicine ward than the ICU. Possible contributors include comorbidity burden, nurse to patient ratios, and nasogastric tube fixation techniques. These confounding variables warrant further investigation.

重症监护病房及内科病房鼻胃管相关压力损伤的发生率。
背景:由鼻胃管引起的医疗器械相关压力损伤的发生率数据有限。重症监护病房(ICU)的发病率可能高于内科病房,因为ICU患者的脆弱性增加。目的:了解ICU和内科病房患者鼻胃管相关性压力损伤的发生率及影响因素。方法:这项前瞻性队列研究纳入了在ICU或内科病房入院时或入院前4小时内放置鼻胃管的成年人。排除有面部损伤、伤口或溃疡的患者。每日监测患者有无鼻胃管相关压力损伤;记录压伤的位置和阶段。结果:数据采集于2022年7月至2024年7月某综合医疗中心900个床位的ICU(88例)和内科病房(48例)。ICU病房鼻胃管相关压力损伤发生率(4例,0.47例/ 100患者-d)明显低于内科病房(13例,3.02例/ 100患者-d) (P < 0.001)。内科病房患者的Charlson合并症指数高于ICU患者(平均[SD], 7.7[2.39]比3 [2.41];P = .02)。不同科室鼻胃管固定方法不同。结论:与以往报道不同,内科病房的鼻胃管相关压力损伤发生率高于ICU。可能的影响因素包括合并症负担、护士与病人比例和鼻胃管固定技术。这些混杂变量值得进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书