Spatial–Temporal Patterns and Inequality in Greenspaces in Chinese Campuses

IF 3.9 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Xinqun Yuan, Le Yu, Xiyu Li, Qiang Zhao, Zhenrong Du, Ruiyang Liu
{"title":"Spatial–Temporal Patterns and Inequality in Greenspaces in Chinese Campuses","authors":"Xinqun Yuan,&nbsp;Le Yu,&nbsp;Xiyu Li,&nbsp;Qiang Zhao,&nbsp;Zhenrong Du,&nbsp;Ruiyang Liu","doi":"10.1002/geo2.70098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study employs geographic information technology and remote sensing techniques to conduct a comprehensive assessment of greenspaces in over 12,000 primary schools, 13,000 secondary schools and more than 2500 universities in China. The aim is to reveal the heterogeneity in the quantity and spatial distribution of greenspaces in Chinese campuses and to analyse the factors influencing the inequality of campus greenspaces, thereby providing strategic recommendations for the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals. The research findings indicate that primary and secondary schools have a lower average area and proportion of greenspaces compared to universities. Specifically, university teachers and students enjoy the largest per capita greenspace area, while primary school teachers and students have the smallest per capita greenspace area. Moreover, more than half of the schools show a downward trend in greenspace area. The study also reveals significant heterogeneity in greenspace coverage and per capita greenspace area among different regions and provinces. The results of variance analysis show that the greenspace coverage and per capita greenspace area within schools and universities are significantly lower than those outside areas of campuses. Furthermore, it is found that there is a high level of inequality in per capita greenspace area in urban areas and per capita greenspace area of teachers and students. This study further explores the driving factors affecting the inequality of campus greenspaces. Increasing the per capita greenspace area for teachers and students and the proportion of campus greenspace can alleviate the inequality in greenspaces for teachers and students. An increase in per capita gross regional product, educational expenditure and urban greenspace areas may require more policy support to ensure the fair distribution of per capita greenspace in campuses, thereby alleviating campus greenspace inequality.</p>","PeriodicalId":44089,"journal":{"name":"Geo-Geography and Environment","volume":"13 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/geo2.70098","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geo-Geography and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/geo2.70098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study employs geographic information technology and remote sensing techniques to conduct a comprehensive assessment of greenspaces in over 12,000 primary schools, 13,000 secondary schools and more than 2500 universities in China. The aim is to reveal the heterogeneity in the quantity and spatial distribution of greenspaces in Chinese campuses and to analyse the factors influencing the inequality of campus greenspaces, thereby providing strategic recommendations for the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals. The research findings indicate that primary and secondary schools have a lower average area and proportion of greenspaces compared to universities. Specifically, university teachers and students enjoy the largest per capita greenspace area, while primary school teachers and students have the smallest per capita greenspace area. Moreover, more than half of the schools show a downward trend in greenspace area. The study also reveals significant heterogeneity in greenspace coverage and per capita greenspace area among different regions and provinces. The results of variance analysis show that the greenspace coverage and per capita greenspace area within schools and universities are significantly lower than those outside areas of campuses. Furthermore, it is found that there is a high level of inequality in per capita greenspace area in urban areas and per capita greenspace area of teachers and students. This study further explores the driving factors affecting the inequality of campus greenspaces. Increasing the per capita greenspace area for teachers and students and the proportion of campus greenspace can alleviate the inequality in greenspaces for teachers and students. An increase in per capita gross regional product, educational expenditure and urban greenspace areas may require more policy support to ensure the fair distribution of per capita greenspace in campuses, thereby alleviating campus greenspace inequality.

Abstract Image

中国校园绿地的时空格局与不平等
本研究采用地理信息技术和遥感技术,对中国12000多所小学、13000多所中学和2500多所大学的绿地进行了综合评价。旨在揭示中国校园绿地数量和空间分布的异质性,分析影响校园绿地不平等的因素,从而为实现可持续发展目标提供战略建议。研究结果表明,与大学相比,中小学绿地的平均面积和比例较低。其中,高校师生人均绿地面积最大,小学师生人均绿地面积最小。此外,超过一半的学校绿地面积呈下降趋势。研究还发现,不同地区和省份的绿地覆盖率和人均绿地面积存在显著差异。方差分析结果表明,高校内部绿地覆盖率和人均绿地面积显著低于校园外。进一步发现,城市人均绿地面积与师生人均绿地面积存在高度不平等。本研究进一步探讨了影响校园绿地不平等的驱动因素。提高师生人均绿地面积和校园绿地比例,可以缓解师生绿地的不平等。人均地区生产总值、教育支出和城市绿地面积的增加可能需要更多的政策支持,以确保校园人均绿地的公平分配,从而缓解校园绿地不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: Geo is a fully open access international journal publishing original articles from across the spectrum of geographical and environmental research. Geo welcomes submissions which make a significant contribution to one or more of the journal’s aims. These are to: • encompass the breadth of geographical, environmental and related research, based on original scholarship in the sciences, social sciences and humanities; • bring new understanding to and enhance communication between geographical research agendas, including human-environment interactions, global North-South relations and academic-policy exchange; • advance spatial research and address the importance of geographical enquiry to the understanding of, and action about, contemporary issues; • foster methodological development, including collaborative forms of knowledge production, interdisciplinary approaches and the innovative use of quantitative and/or qualitative data sets; • publish research articles, review papers, data and digital humanities papers, and commentaries which are of international significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书