When disease travels downstream: The effect of intravesical recurrences in patients treated for upper tract urothelial carcinoma

IF 2 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2026-06-29 DOI:10.1002/bco2.70225
Orlane J. A. Figaroa, Sanne J. Jonker, Felix J. Fris, Guido M. Kamphuis, Adriaan D. Bins, R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar, Joyce Baard
{"title":"When disease travels downstream: The effect of intravesical recurrences in patients treated for upper tract urothelial carcinoma","authors":"Orlane J. A. Figaroa,&nbsp;Sanne J. Jonker,&nbsp;Felix J. Fris,&nbsp;Guido M. Kamphuis,&nbsp;Adriaan D. Bins,&nbsp;R. Jeroen A. van Moorselaar,&nbsp;Joyce Baard","doi":"10.1002/bco2.70225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) depends on risk stratification and tumour characteristics. Kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) is preferred for low-risk disease, whereas radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard for high-risk UTUC. Intravesical recurrences (IVR) are common after both treatment modalities, but their impact on survival remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the IVR rate and cumulative hazard following UTUC treatment and oncological outcomes based on the presence of IVR during follow-up. Second, the relation between UTUC and IVR tumour grade in patients treated with endoscopic KSS (eKSS).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A single-centre study, including non-metastatic UTUC patients treated between 2010 and 2023. Analysis was performed in a cohort of patients without a history of bladder cancer.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total 164 patients were selected; 85 treated with eKSS, 79 by RNU. Overall, 91 patients (55%) developed an IVR, 53 (62%) after eKSS and 38 (48%) after RNU, during a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 11–72). eKSS-treated patients showed a significantly higher cumulative hazard for IVR (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.42–0.95, <i>p</i> = 0.02). The CSS and MFS were comparable between patients with or without IVR during follow-up. In patients treated by eKSS, we found IVR upgrading in 24% of patients treated with eKSS.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients treated by eKSS showed a higher cumulative hazard of IVR, without an impact on oncological outcomes. These findings support the use of kidney-sparing approaches in well-selected cases and highlight the need for proper follow-up including the bladder and evaluate IVR preventive measures as intravesical instillations.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"7 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13311729/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.70225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) depends on risk stratification and tumour characteristics. Kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) is preferred for low-risk disease, whereas radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is the standard for high-risk UTUC. Intravesical recurrences (IVR) are common after both treatment modalities, but their impact on survival remains unclear.

Objective

To assess the IVR rate and cumulative hazard following UTUC treatment and oncological outcomes based on the presence of IVR during follow-up. Second, the relation between UTUC and IVR tumour grade in patients treated with endoscopic KSS (eKSS).

Methods

A single-centre study, including non-metastatic UTUC patients treated between 2010 and 2023. Analysis was performed in a cohort of patients without a history of bladder cancer.

Results

In total 164 patients were selected; 85 treated with eKSS, 79 by RNU. Overall, 91 patients (55%) developed an IVR, 53 (62%) after eKSS and 38 (48%) after RNU, during a median follow-up of 33 months (IQR 11–72). eKSS-treated patients showed a significantly higher cumulative hazard for IVR (HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.42–0.95, p = 0.02). The CSS and MFS were comparable between patients with or without IVR during follow-up. In patients treated by eKSS, we found IVR upgrading in 24% of patients treated with eKSS.

Conclusions

Patients treated by eKSS showed a higher cumulative hazard of IVR, without an impact on oncological outcomes. These findings support the use of kidney-sparing approaches in well-selected cases and highlight the need for proper follow-up including the bladder and evaluate IVR preventive measures as intravesical instillations.

Abstract Image

当疾病向下游传播:膀胱内复发对上尿路上皮癌患者的影响。
背景:上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的治疗取决于风险分层和肿瘤特征。保留肾脏手术(KSS)是低风险疾病的首选,而根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)是高风险UTUC的标准。膀胱内复发(IVR)在两种治疗方式后都很常见,但其对生存的影响尚不清楚。目的:评估UTUC治疗后的IVR发生率和累积危害以及随访期间基于IVR存在的肿瘤预后。其次,内镜下KSS (eKSS)患者的UTUC与IVR肿瘤分级之间的关系。方法:一项单中心研究,包括2010年至2023年间接受治疗的非转移性UTUC患者。分析是在没有膀胱癌病史的患者队列中进行的。结果:共入选164例患者;eKSS组85例,RNU组79例。总体而言,在中位随访33个月(IQR 11-72)期间,91例(55%)患者发生IVR, 53例(62%)患者在eKSS后发生IVR, 38例(48%)患者在RNU后发生IVR。ekss治疗的患者的IVR累积风险显著增加(HR 0.6, 95% CI 0.42-0.95, p = 0.02)。随访期间,有无IVR患者的CSS和MFS具有可比性。在接受eKSS治疗的患者中,我们发现24%接受eKSS治疗的患者IVR升级。结论:接受eKSS治疗的患者显示出更高的IVR累积风险,但对肿瘤预后没有影响。这些发现支持在精心挑选的病例中使用保肾入路,并强调需要进行适当的随访,包括膀胱和评估静脉滴注IVR预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书