Ingri G Olsen, Marianne Wesnes, Hanne Næss, Eike Wehling, Eirik Vikane, Geir Arne Sunde, Oddvar Uleberg, Lars Gunnar Johnsen
{"title":"Early rehabilitation in trauma patients: an observational study from two Norwegian trauma centers.","authors":"Ingri G Olsen, Marianne Wesnes, Hanne Næss, Eike Wehling, Eirik Vikane, Geir Arne Sunde, Oddvar Uleberg, Lars Gunnar Johnsen","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v58.45625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the provision of consultation by a specialist in physical and rehabilitation medicine, and timing of early rehabilitation services for severely injured trauma patients as recommended in the Norwegian Trauma Plan.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Observational cohort study.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>Adults aged ≥ 18 years admitted with severe (New Injury Severity Score > 12) traumatic injuries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Observational cohort study with data from the Norwegian Trauma Registry and medical records. Outcomes included consultation with a physical and rehabilitation medicine specialist, timing of assessment, and involvement of health professions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 317 patients, 10% received assessment by a physical and rehabilitation medicine specialist within 72 h. Early assessment occurred in 43% (n = 6) of patients with spinal cord injury, 12% (n = 8) with traumatic brain injury, and 7% (n = 17) with multitrauma. Overall, 31% (n = 99) of all patients were assessed by a physical and rehabilitation medicine specialist, including 93% (n = 13) of spinal cord injury patients, 57% (n = 39) with traumatic brain injury, and 19% (n = 43) with multitrauma. Physiotherapists assessed 72% of patients, while involvement from other rehabilitation professionals was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite recommendations, only one-third of patients were assessed by a physical and rehabilitation medicine specialist, and 10% within 72 h. Physiotherapy was common, but other rehabilitation input was limited. Patients with spinal cord injury received more comprehensive care than those with traumatic brain injury or multitrauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"58 ","pages":"jrm45625"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13329718/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v58.45625","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To examine the provision of consultation by a specialist in physical and rehabilitation medicine, and timing of early rehabilitation services for severely injured trauma patients as recommended in the Norwegian Trauma Plan.
Design: Observational cohort study.
Subjects/patients: Adults aged ≥ 18 years admitted with severe (New Injury Severity Score > 12) traumatic injuries.
Methods: Observational cohort study with data from the Norwegian Trauma Registry and medical records. Outcomes included consultation with a physical and rehabilitation medicine specialist, timing of assessment, and involvement of health professions.
Results: Among 317 patients, 10% received assessment by a physical and rehabilitation medicine specialist within 72 h. Early assessment occurred in 43% (n = 6) of patients with spinal cord injury, 12% (n = 8) with traumatic brain injury, and 7% (n = 17) with multitrauma. Overall, 31% (n = 99) of all patients were assessed by a physical and rehabilitation medicine specialist, including 93% (n = 13) of spinal cord injury patients, 57% (n = 39) with traumatic brain injury, and 19% (n = 43) with multitrauma. Physiotherapists assessed 72% of patients, while involvement from other rehabilitation professionals was limited.
Conclusion: Despite recommendations, only one-third of patients were assessed by a physical and rehabilitation medicine specialist, and 10% within 72 h. Physiotherapy was common, but other rehabilitation input was limited. Patients with spinal cord injury received more comprehensive care than those with traumatic brain injury or multitrauma.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year.
Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.