Coordinating care across hospitals: how integration shapes patient mobility.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Guérin Loïc, Sirven Nicolas
{"title":"Coordinating care across hospitals: how integration shapes patient mobility.","authors":"Guérin Loïc, Sirven Nicolas","doi":"10.1007/s10198-026-01939-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2016, France reformed its health system by requiring public hospitals to form territorial groups. Policymakers, following experiences with integrated care provision in the United States and NHS-type networks in Italy and England, expected these groups to improve coordination and system efficiency. However, it remains unclear whether such administrative integration creates new care pathways within groups or substitutes for existing referral relationships with external providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed national hospital administrative data from 2013 to 2021. Changes in inter-facility transfer rates were estimated using a synthetic difference-in-differences approach. The main outcome was the annual percentage of patients transferred to another hospital, overall and within the same group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following group formation, smaller local hospitals experienced an average increase of 1.25 percentage points in transfers to hospitals within their group. Transfers to hospitals outside the group remained broadly stable, suggesting limited substitution away from pre-existing referral channels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Territorial grouping are associated with an increase in internal patient mobility, particularly among local hospitals, without reducing exchanges with external providers. These findings suggest that administrative integration may have layered new coordination arrangements onto existing care pathways and reinforced patterns of functional specialization. The results contribute to understanding how network-based integration reshapes organizational behaviour and patient mobility in regulated health systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-026-01939-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2016, France reformed its health system by requiring public hospitals to form territorial groups. Policymakers, following experiences with integrated care provision in the United States and NHS-type networks in Italy and England, expected these groups to improve coordination and system efficiency. However, it remains unclear whether such administrative integration creates new care pathways within groups or substitutes for existing referral relationships with external providers.

Methods: We analyzed national hospital administrative data from 2013 to 2021. Changes in inter-facility transfer rates were estimated using a synthetic difference-in-differences approach. The main outcome was the annual percentage of patients transferred to another hospital, overall and within the same group.

Results: Following group formation, smaller local hospitals experienced an average increase of 1.25 percentage points in transfers to hospitals within their group. Transfers to hospitals outside the group remained broadly stable, suggesting limited substitution away from pre-existing referral channels.

Conclusions: Territorial grouping are associated with an increase in internal patient mobility, particularly among local hospitals, without reducing exchanges with external providers. These findings suggest that administrative integration may have layered new coordination arrangements onto existing care pathways and reinforced patterns of functional specialization. The results contribute to understanding how network-based integration reshapes organizational behaviour and patient mobility in regulated health systems.

协调各医院的护理:整合如何影响患者的移动性。
背景:2016年,法国对其医疗体系进行了改革,要求公立医院组建属地集团。政策制定者借鉴了美国的综合医疗服务以及意大利和英国的nhs类型网络的经验,期望这些团体能够改善协调和系统效率。然而,目前尚不清楚这种行政整合是否在群体内创造了新的护理途径,还是替代了与外部提供者的现有转诊关系。方法:对2013 - 2021年全国医院行政管理数据进行分析。使用综合差异中的差异方法估计了设施间转移率的变化。研究的主要结果是每年转院到另一家医院的患者的百分比,总体上和同一组内。结果:分组后,较小的地方医院转诊到集团内医院的平均增加了1.25个百分点。向集团外医院的转诊大体保持稳定,表明现有转诊渠道的替代有限。结论:地域分组与内部患者流动性的增加有关,特别是在地方医院之间,而不会减少与外部提供者的交流。这些发现表明,行政整合可能在现有的护理途径上分层了新的协调安排,并加强了功能专业化的模式。研究结果有助于理解基于网络的整合如何在受监管的卫生系统中重塑组织行为和患者流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书