Risk Factors for Mechanical Restraint Use in Non-ICU Hospitalized Patients With Delirium.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
George Book, Meghan Thomas, Jingwen Zhang, Justin Marsden, Marc Heincelman, Andrew Schriener, Benjamin Kalivas
{"title":"Risk Factors for Mechanical Restraint Use in Non-ICU Hospitalized Patients With Delirium.","authors":"George Book, Meghan Thomas, Jingwen Zhang, Justin Marsden, Marc Heincelman, Andrew Schriener, Benjamin Kalivas","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated demographic and clinical factors that contribute to a patient receiving mechanical restraints while hospitalized, with particular focus on the results of delirium screening and receipt of antipsychotics as risk factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all non-ICU adult patients admitted to a large academic hospital between August 1, 2018, and January 31, 2021. Sociodemographic data, the results of the brief confusion assessment method (bCAM) screening, and receipt of antipsychotic medication were collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the impact of receipt of an order for mechanical restraints on the primary outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 23,366 non-ICU admissions, of which 408 received mechanical restraints during their hospitalization. There were 1379 (5.90%) admissions with a positive delirium screen, and 4939 (21.5%) of patients received an antipsychotic. When adjusting for sociodemographic factors, receiving an antipsychotic had an OR of 9.1 (95% CI: 6.41-12.93) for having an order for mechanical restraints. A positive bCAM had an OR of 27.94 (95% CI: 18.65-41.86), and a positive bCAM and receipt of an antipsychotic had an OR of 190.30 (95% CI: 135.34-267.58) of having an order for mechanical restraints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings support the understanding that delirium and antipsychotics are enormous risk factors for a patient receiving mechanical restraints. And while many patients receive antipsychotics first, some do not, representing an important area for improvement in patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001557","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We investigated demographic and clinical factors that contribute to a patient receiving mechanical restraints while hospitalized, with particular focus on the results of delirium screening and receipt of antipsychotics as risk factors.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all non-ICU adult patients admitted to a large academic hospital between August 1, 2018, and January 31, 2021. Sociodemographic data, the results of the brief confusion assessment method (bCAM) screening, and receipt of antipsychotic medication were collected and analyzed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the impact of receipt of an order for mechanical restraints on the primary outcome.

Results: The study included 23,366 non-ICU admissions, of which 408 received mechanical restraints during their hospitalization. There were 1379 (5.90%) admissions with a positive delirium screen, and 4939 (21.5%) of patients received an antipsychotic. When adjusting for sociodemographic factors, receiving an antipsychotic had an OR of 9.1 (95% CI: 6.41-12.93) for having an order for mechanical restraints. A positive bCAM had an OR of 27.94 (95% CI: 18.65-41.86), and a positive bCAM and receipt of an antipsychotic had an OR of 190.30 (95% CI: 135.34-267.58) of having an order for mechanical restraints.

Conclusions: Our findings support the understanding that delirium and antipsychotics are enormous risk factors for a patient receiving mechanical restraints. And while many patients receive antipsychotics first, some do not, representing an important area for improvement in patient safety.

非icu住院谵妄患者使用机械约束的危险因素。
目的:我们调查了导致患者在住院期间接受机械约束的人口学和临床因素,特别关注谵妄筛查结果和抗精神病药物的接受作为危险因素。方法:我们对2018年8月1日至2021年1月31日期间入住一家大型学术医院的所有非icu成年患者进行了回顾性队列研究。收集和分析社会人口学数据、简要混淆评估法(bCAM)筛查结果和抗精神病药物的使用情况。单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析用于确定收到机械约束订单对主要结果的影响。结果:本研究纳入23,366例非icu住院患者,其中408例在住院期间接受了机械约束。1379例(5.90%)入院患者谵妄筛查阳性,4939例(21.5%)患者接受抗精神病药物治疗。在对社会人口因素进行调整后,接受抗精神病药物治疗的机械约束订单的OR为9.1 (95% CI: 6.41-12.93)。bCAM阳性的OR为27.94 (95% CI: 18.65-41.86), bCAM阳性和接受抗精神病药物的OR为190.30 (95% CI: 135.34-267.58)。结论:我们的研究结果支持谵妄和抗精神病药物是接受机械约束患者的巨大危险因素的理解。虽然许多患者首先接受抗精神病药物治疗,但也有一些患者没有,这是改善患者安全的一个重要领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书