'Stay Curious': guest experiences of philosophical counselling in palliative care - a qualitative study.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Patrick Schuchter, Sandra Radinger, Stefanie Veronika Rieger, Klaus Wegleitner
{"title":"'Stay Curious': guest experiences of philosophical counselling in palliative care - a qualitative study.","authors":"Patrick Schuchter, Sandra Radinger, Stefanie Veronika Rieger, Klaus Wegleitner","doi":"10.1186/s12904-026-02178-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Philosophical counselling creates a dialogical space for exploring existential questions arising from serious illness, confrontation with mortality, bereavement, and caregiving. Although philosophy has long engaged with mortality and existential concerns, philosophy in form of philosophical counselling is not established in palliative care and has seldom been empirically studied. This study examines the views and experiences of individuals who engaged in philosophical counselling in palliative care-related contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Nine counselling processes were completed; post-counselling interviews were obtained from eight guests and analysed. Purposive sampling identified practitioners via professional associations in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland; guests were recruited by these practitioners in naturalistic practice settings. A qualitative content analysis was used to identify categories and subthemes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through iterative, interpretive analysis, we generated four main categories: distinctive features of philosophical counselling; how guests perceived the philosophical practitioner; perceived effects; and strengths and limits. Participants valued freedom to explore open-ended questions without pressure to act or solve problems. Conversations were described as inspiring and created space for a \"stepping out\"-being seen as a person rather than only as affected. We interpreted philosophical curiosity as a grounding stance toward mortality. At the same time, critical questioning could become destabilizing, underscoring the need for calibrated movement between personal involvement and abstract reflection within an empathetic dialogical relationship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Philosophical counselling seems to offer a space for reflective depth and existential inquiry in palliative care, fostering curiosity, wonder, and connectedness. It is described as offering intellectual freedom and an open, goal-free space. Practice implications include preserving this space, resisting help-driven agendas and didactic, overly abstract lecturing, and calibrating critical inquiry within empathetic dialogue. Philosophical counselling may contribute to facets of death literacy. Our findings indicate that end-of-life themes are already being addressed within philosophical counselling and offer guidance for introducing practice in palliative care contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13576289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-026-02178-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Philosophical counselling creates a dialogical space for exploring existential questions arising from serious illness, confrontation with mortality, bereavement, and caregiving. Although philosophy has long engaged with mortality and existential concerns, philosophy in form of philosophical counselling is not established in palliative care and has seldom been empirically studied. This study examines the views and experiences of individuals who engaged in philosophical counselling in palliative care-related contexts.

Methods: Nine counselling processes were completed; post-counselling interviews were obtained from eight guests and analysed. Purposive sampling identified practitioners via professional associations in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland; guests were recruited by these practitioners in naturalistic practice settings. A qualitative content analysis was used to identify categories and subthemes.

Results: Through iterative, interpretive analysis, we generated four main categories: distinctive features of philosophical counselling; how guests perceived the philosophical practitioner; perceived effects; and strengths and limits. Participants valued freedom to explore open-ended questions without pressure to act or solve problems. Conversations were described as inspiring and created space for a "stepping out"-being seen as a person rather than only as affected. We interpreted philosophical curiosity as a grounding stance toward mortality. At the same time, critical questioning could become destabilizing, underscoring the need for calibrated movement between personal involvement and abstract reflection within an empathetic dialogical relationship.

Conclusions: Philosophical counselling seems to offer a space for reflective depth and existential inquiry in palliative care, fostering curiosity, wonder, and connectedness. It is described as offering intellectual freedom and an open, goal-free space. Practice implications include preserving this space, resisting help-driven agendas and didactic, overly abstract lecturing, and calibrating critical inquiry within empathetic dialogue. Philosophical counselling may contribute to facets of death literacy. Our findings indicate that end-of-life themes are already being addressed within philosophical counselling and offer guidance for introducing practice in palliative care contexts.

“保持好奇”:姑息治疗中哲学咨询的客人体验-一项定性研究。
背景:哲学咨询创造了一个对话空间,用于探索由严重疾病、面对死亡、丧亲之痛和照顾引起的存在问题。尽管哲学长期以来一直关注死亡和存在主义问题,但哲学咨询形式的哲学并未在姑息治疗中建立起来,也很少进行实证研究。本研究考察了在姑息治疗相关背景下从事哲学咨询的个人的观点和经验。方法:完成9个咨询过程;咨询后访谈从8位客人获得并分析。有目的抽样通过奥地利、德国和瑞士的专业协会确定从业人员;这些从业者在自然主义的实践环境中招募客人。定性内容分析用于确定类别和次级主题。结果:通过反复的解释性分析,我们产生了四个主要类别:哲学咨询的鲜明特征;客人如何看待哲学实践者;感知的影响;长处和局限。参与者重视探索开放式问题的自由,没有采取行动或解决问题的压力。谈话被描述为鼓舞人心的,并为“走出去”创造了空间——被视为一个人,而不仅仅是受影响。我们把哲学上的好奇心解释为对死亡的基本立场。与此同时,批判性问题可能会变得不稳定,强调需要在移情对话关系中在个人参与和抽象反思之间进行校准。结论:哲学咨询似乎为缓和医疗的反思深度和存在性探究提供了空间,培养了好奇心、奇迹和联系。它被描述为提供思想自由和一个开放的、无目标的空间。实践意义包括保留这一空间,抵制帮助驱动的议程和说教,过于抽象的讲座,以及在移情对话中校准批判性探究。哲学咨询可能有助于死亡素养的各个方面。我们的研究结果表明,临终主题已经在哲学咨询中得到解决,并为在姑息治疗背景下引入实践提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书