Robotic reconstruction in genitourinary tuberculosis: Surmounting technical challenges.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
R Bharath, Sidhartha Kalra, Rudra Prasad Ghorai, Sreerag Kodakkattil Sreenivasan, L N Dorairajan, Sidhant Bolar, Rajat Mudhol, Guka Priyan, Pulkit Gupta, N L Bharath
{"title":"Robotic reconstruction in genitourinary tuberculosis: Surmounting technical challenges.","authors":"R Bharath, Sidhartha Kalra, Rudra Prasad Ghorai, Sreerag Kodakkattil Sreenivasan, L N Dorairajan, Sidhant Bolar, Rajat Mudhol, Guka Priyan, Pulkit Gupta, N L Bharath","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_585_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Genitourinary tuberculosis (GUTB) causes long ureteric strictures, bladder contracture and renal function impairment. While open reconstruction has been traditional, it entails considerable morbidity. Robotic-assisted reconstructive surgery provides three-dimensional visualisation, greater precision and expedited recovery. This study evaluates the complexities of reconstructive robotic surgery and explores strategies to mitigate them, aiming for optimal outcomes. The primary objective was to discern the surgical and technical challenges, intraoperative difficulties and perioperative complications associated with robotic intracorporeal reconstructive surgeries for GUTB.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary centre. Thirteen patients were diagnosed with GUTB who underwent robotic urological procedures from January 2018 to May 2025. All patients received antitubercular treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen patients (11 males and 2 females) with GUTB underwent robotic surgery during the study period. The mean age of the study population was 42.3 ± 13.2 years. The mean robotic console time was 236.5 ± 40.07 min, and the intra-operative mean blood loss was 122.3 ± 14.23 ml. The average follow-up period was 13.3 ± 10.01 months. This study encompassed robotic procedures, such as ileal ureter substitution, augmentation cystoplasty, Boari flap reconstruction, combined ileal ureter and augmentation cystoplasty and Studer neobladder reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Robotic reconstruction in GUTB is a feasible and safe procedure, even in the presence of anatomical distortion and fibrosis. Robotic platforms facilitate meticulous dissection and boost anastomosis accuracy, resulting in better outcomes and decreased morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_585_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Genitourinary tuberculosis (GUTB) causes long ureteric strictures, bladder contracture and renal function impairment. While open reconstruction has been traditional, it entails considerable morbidity. Robotic-assisted reconstructive surgery provides three-dimensional visualisation, greater precision and expedited recovery. This study evaluates the complexities of reconstructive robotic surgery and explores strategies to mitigate them, aiming for optimal outcomes. The primary objective was to discern the surgical and technical challenges, intraoperative difficulties and perioperative complications associated with robotic intracorporeal reconstructive surgeries for GUTB.

Patients and methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a single tertiary centre. Thirteen patients were diagnosed with GUTB who underwent robotic urological procedures from January 2018 to May 2025. All patients received antitubercular treatment.

Results: Thirteen patients (11 males and 2 females) with GUTB underwent robotic surgery during the study period. The mean age of the study population was 42.3 ± 13.2 years. The mean robotic console time was 236.5 ± 40.07 min, and the intra-operative mean blood loss was 122.3 ± 14.23 ml. The average follow-up period was 13.3 ± 10.01 months. This study encompassed robotic procedures, such as ileal ureter substitution, augmentation cystoplasty, Boari flap reconstruction, combined ileal ureter and augmentation cystoplasty and Studer neobladder reconstruction.

Conclusions: Robotic reconstruction in GUTB is a feasible and safe procedure, even in the presence of anatomical distortion and fibrosis. Robotic platforms facilitate meticulous dissection and boost anastomosis accuracy, resulting in better outcomes and decreased morbidity.

泌尿生殖系统结核的机器人重建:克服技术挑战。
泌尿生殖系统结核(GUTB)引起输尿管长狭窄、膀胱挛缩和肾功能损害。虽然开放重建是传统的,但它会带来相当大的发病率。机器人辅助重建手术提供三维可视化,更高的精度和更快的恢复。本研究评估了重建机器人手术的复杂性,并探讨了减轻复杂性的策略,旨在获得最佳结果。主要目的是了解GUTB机器人体内重建手术的手术和技术挑战、术中困难和围手术期并发症。患者和方法:本回顾性研究在单一三级中心进行。从2018年1月到2025年5月,13名被诊断为GUTB的患者接受了机器人泌尿外科手术。所有患者均接受抗结核治疗。结果:13例GUTB患者(男性11例,女性2例)在研究期间接受了机器人手术。研究人群的平均年龄为42.3±13.2岁。机器人操作台平均时间236.5±40.07 min,术中平均出血量122.3±14.23 ml,平均随访时间13.3±10.01个月。本研究包括机器人手术,如回肠输尿管替代、膀胱膨大成形术、Boari皮瓣重建、回肠输尿管联合膀胱膨大成形术和Studer新膀胱重建。结论:机器人重建GUTB是一种可行且安全的手术,即使存在解剖扭曲和纤维化。机器人平台有助于细致的解剖和提高吻合的准确性,从而获得更好的结果和降低发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书