Enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair for ventral hernia: A prospective analysis of peri-operative outcomes, functional recovery, and cost effectiveness.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Jyoti Singh, Akshay Anand, Ved Prakash Singh, Awanish Kumar, Pankaj Kumar, Amit Karnik, Harvinder S Pahwa, Abhinav Arun Sonkar
{"title":"Enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair for ventral hernia: A prospective analysis of peri-operative outcomes, functional recovery, and cost effectiveness.","authors":"Jyoti Singh, Akshay Anand, Ved Prakash Singh, Awanish Kumar, Pankaj Kumar, Amit Karnik, Harvinder S Pahwa, Abhinav Arun Sonkar","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_577_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimally invasive ventral hernia repair has traditionally been performed using intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). Although effective, IPOM places mesh within the peritoneal cavity, with potential risks related to adhesions and mesh-bowel interaction. Enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair recreates the retromuscular (Rives-Stoppa) plane using a laparoscopic approach and may reduce these concerns.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A prospective, observational study was conducted on n = 24 adult patients undergoing eTEP retrorectus ventral hernia repair. Perioperative outcomes, post-operative pain (Visual Analogue Scale), complications, quality of life (Carolinas Comfort Scale; HerQLes) and abdominal wall function (double-leg lowering and trunk-raising tests) were assessed at 7 days, 1 month and 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age was 45.6 ± 13.7 years; 54.2% were women. Mean operative time was 167.0 ± 28.7 min; no intraoperative visceral or vascular injury occurred. Surgical-site infection and seroma occurred in one patient each (4.2%) at 7 days and resolved by 1 month. Pain peaked in the early post-operative period and declined significantly over the follow-up (repeated-measures analysis of variance P < 0.001). Both CCS and HerQLes scores improved significantly at 1 and 3 months ( P < 0.001), with parallel improvement in abdominal wall function tests ( P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this early experience, eTEP retrorectus repair was feasible and safe with low early morbidity, significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes and improved abdominal wall function over 3 months. Larger comparative studies with longer follow-up are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_577_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Minimally invasive ventral hernia repair has traditionally been performed using intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). Although effective, IPOM places mesh within the peritoneal cavity, with potential risks related to adhesions and mesh-bowel interaction. Enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) repair recreates the retromuscular (Rives-Stoppa) plane using a laparoscopic approach and may reduce these concerns.

Patients and methods: A prospective, observational study was conducted on n = 24 adult patients undergoing eTEP retrorectus ventral hernia repair. Perioperative outcomes, post-operative pain (Visual Analogue Scale), complications, quality of life (Carolinas Comfort Scale; HerQLes) and abdominal wall function (double-leg lowering and trunk-raising tests) were assessed at 7 days, 1 month and 3 months.

Results: The mean age was 45.6 ± 13.7 years; 54.2% were women. Mean operative time was 167.0 ± 28.7 min; no intraoperative visceral or vascular injury occurred. Surgical-site infection and seroma occurred in one patient each (4.2%) at 7 days and resolved by 1 month. Pain peaked in the early post-operative period and declined significantly over the follow-up (repeated-measures analysis of variance P < 0.001). Both CCS and HerQLes scores improved significantly at 1 and 3 months ( P < 0.001), with parallel improvement in abdominal wall function tests ( P < 0.001).

Conclusion: In this early experience, eTEP retrorectus repair was feasible and safe with low early morbidity, significant improvement in patient-reported outcomes and improved abdominal wall function over 3 months. Larger comparative studies with longer follow-up are warranted.

全腹膜外增强视野(eTEP)修复腹疝:围手术期结果、功能恢复和成本效益的前瞻性分析。
微创腹疝修补术传统上采用腹腔内补片(IPOM)。虽然有效,但IPOM将网状物置于腹膜腔内,存在与粘连和网状物-肠相互作用相关的潜在风险。增强视野全腹膜外(eTEP)修复使用腹腔镜入路重建肌肉后(rivers - stoppa)平面,可以减少这些担忧。患者和方法:对n = 24例行eTEP后直肌腹疝修补术的成年患者进行前瞻性观察研究。在7天、1个月和3个月分别评估围手术期结局、术后疼痛(视觉模拟量表)、并发症、生活质量(carolina Comfort Scale; HerQLes)和腹壁功能(双腿放低和抬身试验)。结果:患者平均年龄45.6±13.7岁;54.2%为女性。平均手术时间167.0±28.7 min;术中未发生内脏或血管损伤。手术部位感染和血肿各有1例(4.2%)在第7天发生,1个月消退。疼痛在术后早期达到高峰,在随访期间显著下降(重复测量分析方差P < 0.001)。CCS和HerQLes评分在1个月和3个月时均显著改善(P < 0.001),腹壁功能测试也有平行改善(P < 0.001)。结论:在这个早期的经验中,eTEP直肌修复是可行和安全的,早期发病率低,患者报告的结果显著改善,3个月后腹壁功能改善。更大规模的比较研究和更长的随访是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书