The role of digital health literacy in shaping nurses' self-efficacy and innovative work behavior: A cross-sectional study.

IF 2.1 Q3 NURSING
Belitung Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2026-06-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.33546/bnj.4452
Doaa Abd El-Fattah Mousa Edrees, Amal Hamdy Abou Ramadan, Fatma Zaghloul Mahmoud, Ahmed Mansour Almansour, Moataz Maged, Mohamed Gamal Mostafa
{"title":"The role of digital health literacy in shaping nurses' self-efficacy and innovative work behavior: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Doaa Abd El-Fattah Mousa Edrees, Amal Hamdy Abou Ramadan, Fatma Zaghloul Mahmoud, Ahmed Mansour Almansour, Moataz Maged, Mohamed Gamal Mostafa","doi":"10.33546/bnj.4452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the evolving digital healthcare landscape, nurses are required to adapt to emerging technologies and demonstrate digital health literacy (DHL) to ensure high-quality patient care. DHL may enhance nurses' self-efficacy (SE) and foster innovative work behavior (IWB), both of which are essential for professional development and healthcare innovation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the role of digital health literacy in shaping nurses' self-efficacy and innovative work behavior.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted among all available intensive care unit nurses (<i>N</i> = 406) at two university-affiliated hospitals in Egypt. Data were collected between November 2024 and January 2025 using three validated instruments: The Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), and the Innovative Work Behavior Scale (IWBS). Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multivariate linear regressions. A mediation analysis was further conducted to evaluate the role of self-efficacy in the relationship between digital health literacy and innovative work behavior.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurses reported a mean digital health literacy score of 68.34 ± 10.61 (75.14% of the maximum possible score). The mean self-efficacy score was (32.36 ± 6.30). Approximately 66% of participants exhibited relatively high scores of innovative work behavior, particularly in the domains of idea generation and implementation. Statistically significant positive correlations were found between DHL and SE (<i>r</i> = 0.688, <i>p</i> < 0.001), DHL and IWB (<i>r</i> = 0.484, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and SE and IWB (<i>r</i> = 0.674, <i>p</i> < 0.001). An adjusted mediation analysis showed that DHL was positively associated with SE (<i>B</i> = 0.443, <i>β</i> = 0.688, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>R²</i> = 0.565) and with IWB in the total effect model (<i>B</i> = 0.453, <i>p</i> < 0.001). SE was also positively associated with IWB (<i>B</i> = 0.787, <i>β</i> = 0.604, <i>p</i> < 0.001). After inclusion of SE in the mediation model, the direct effect of DHL on innovative work behavior remained significant. The final mediation model explained 54.8% of the variance in innovative work behavior (<i>R²</i> = 0.548), after controlling for hospital type, age, and department. Mediation analysis indicated that SE partially mediated the association between DHL and IWB.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital health literacy was positively associated with nurses' self-efficacy and innovative work behavior, with self-efficacy partially mediating the association within the tested model. These findings suggest that integrating DHL into continuous professional development and nursing curricula may be beneficial to support digital transformation in healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":42002,"journal":{"name":"Belitung Nursing Journal","volume":"12 3","pages":"279-287"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13312100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belitung Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.4452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the evolving digital healthcare landscape, nurses are required to adapt to emerging technologies and demonstrate digital health literacy (DHL) to ensure high-quality patient care. DHL may enhance nurses' self-efficacy (SE) and foster innovative work behavior (IWB), both of which are essential for professional development and healthcare innovation.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the role of digital health literacy in shaping nurses' self-efficacy and innovative work behavior.

Methods: A cross-sectional correlational study was conducted among all available intensive care unit nurses (N = 406) at two university-affiliated hospitals in Egypt. Data were collected between November 2024 and January 2025 using three validated instruments: The Digital Health Literacy Instrument (DHLI), the General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), and the Innovative Work Behavior Scale (IWBS). Data analysis included descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation, and multivariate linear regressions. A mediation analysis was further conducted to evaluate the role of self-efficacy in the relationship between digital health literacy and innovative work behavior.

Results: Nurses reported a mean digital health literacy score of 68.34 ± 10.61 (75.14% of the maximum possible score). The mean self-efficacy score was (32.36 ± 6.30). Approximately 66% of participants exhibited relatively high scores of innovative work behavior, particularly in the domains of idea generation and implementation. Statistically significant positive correlations were found between DHL and SE (r = 0.688, p < 0.001), DHL and IWB (r = 0.484, p < 0.001), and SE and IWB (r = 0.674, p < 0.001). An adjusted mediation analysis showed that DHL was positively associated with SE (B = 0.443, β = 0.688, p < 0.001, R² = 0.565) and with IWB in the total effect model (B = 0.453, p < 0.001). SE was also positively associated with IWB (B = 0.787, β = 0.604, p < 0.001). After inclusion of SE in the mediation model, the direct effect of DHL on innovative work behavior remained significant. The final mediation model explained 54.8% of the variance in innovative work behavior (R² = 0.548), after controlling for hospital type, age, and department. Mediation analysis indicated that SE partially mediated the association between DHL and IWB.

Conclusion: Digital health literacy was positively associated with nurses' self-efficacy and innovative work behavior, with self-efficacy partially mediating the association within the tested model. These findings suggest that integrating DHL into continuous professional development and nursing curricula may be beneficial to support digital transformation in healthcare.

数字健康素养在塑造护士自我效能感和创新工作行为中的作用:一项横断面研究。
背景:在不断发展的数字医疗环境中,护士需要适应新兴技术并展示数字健康素养(DHL),以确保高质量的患者护理。DHL可以提高护士的自我效能感(SE)和培养创新工作行为(IWB),这两者都是专业发展和医疗保健创新所必需的。目的:探讨数字健康素养在塑造护士自我效能感和创新工作行为中的作用。方法:对埃及两所大学附属医院所有重症监护室护士(N = 406)进行横断面相关性研究。数据收集于2024年11月至2025年1月,使用三种经过验证的工具:数字健康素养工具(DHLI)、一般自我效能量表(GSE)和创新工作行为量表(IWBS)。数据分析包括描述性统计、Pearson相关和多元线性回归。进一步进行中介分析,评估自我效能感在数字健康素养与创新工作行为之间的作用。结果:护士报告的数字健康素养平均得分为68.34±10.61(75.14%)。平均自我效能评分为(32.36±6.30)分。大约66%的参与者在创新工作行为方面表现出相对较高的得分,特别是在创意产生和实施方面。DHL与SE (r = 0.688, p < 0.001)、DHL与IWB (r = 0.484, p < 0.001)、SE与IWB (r = 0.674, p < 0.001)呈正相关。调整后的中介分析显示,在总效应模型中,DHL与SE (B = 0.443, β = 0.688, p < 0.001, R²= 0.565)和IWB (B = 0.453, p < 0.001)呈正相关。SE与IWB呈正相关(B = 0.787, β = 0.604, p < 0.001)。在中介模型中加入SE后,DHL对创新工作行为的直接影响仍然显著。在控制医院类型、年龄和科室后,最终的中介模型解释了创新工作行为方差的54.8% (R²= 0.548)。中介分析表明,SE在DHL与IWB之间起到部分中介作用。结论:数字健康素养与护士自我效能感和创新工作行为呈正相关,自我效能感在模型中起部分中介作用。这些发现表明,将DHL整合到持续专业发展和护理课程中可能有利于支持医疗保健领域的数字化转型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书