Durable Outcomes and Intervention Avoidance in Low Back Pain Up to 5 Years After Percutaneous 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain and Therapy Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-30 DOI:10.1007/s40122-026-00858-3
Samir J Sheth, Denise D Lester, Jaudat Mahmood, Sarah E Trampota, G Lawson Smith, Raheleh Rahimi Darabad, Brandon D Swan, Meredith J McGee, Joseph W Boggs
{"title":"Durable Outcomes and Intervention Avoidance in Low Back Pain Up to 5 Years After Percutaneous 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation.","authors":"Samir J Sheth, Denise D Lester, Jaudat Mahmood, Sarah E Trampota, G Lawson Smith, Raheleh Rahimi Darabad, Brandon D Swan, Meredith J McGee, Joseph W Boggs","doi":"10.1007/s40122-026-00858-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and treatment often necessitates invasive interventions that carry significant risks and economic burdens. While prior studies demonstrated durable benefit following percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), real-world data are needed to characterize long-term outcomes across routine clinical practice. This survey evaluated the durability of patient-reported improvements among a real-world cohort of patients with LBP who responded to 60-day PNS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional follow-up survey was administered to patients who previously responded to 60-day PNS targeting the lumbar medial branch nerves. Outcomes assessed included patient-reported percent pain relief and impression of change in quality of life (QoL), physical function, mood, and sleep. Participants also reported use or avoidance of other LBP treatments or interventions since completing 60-day PNS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey was completed by 602 participants, with follow-up durations ranging from 6 to 68 months. Overall, 79% (475/602) of participants required no radiofrequency ablation (RFA), permanent implant, or surgery following 60-day PNS. Among participants who avoided subsequent interventions, 79% (376/475) reported durable improvements in at least one domain (≥ 50% pain relief and/or clinically meaningful improvement of QoL, physical function, mood, and/or sleep) at follow-up. Among participants without a prior permanent neurostimulator implant, 92% (309/336) of those who sought to avoid permanent implantation succeeded. Among those without prior low back surgery who wanted to avoid it, 95% (353/370) avoided surgery through follow‑up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that patients with LBP who respond to percutaneous 60-day PNS may experience durable relief, with benefits sustained by some for 5+ years. Participants reported reductions in pain leading to improvements in other health domains, and avoidance of subsequent interventions, including surgery, permanent implants, and/or RFA, through long-term follow-up, highlighting the potential use of percutaneous 60-day PNS as a minimally invasive, short-term treatment capable of producing long-lasting benefits in patients with LBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":19908,"journal":{"name":"Pain and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1345-1361"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13623810/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40122-026-00858-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Low back pain (LBP) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and treatment often necessitates invasive interventions that carry significant risks and economic burdens. While prior studies demonstrated durable benefit following percutaneous 60-day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), real-world data are needed to characterize long-term outcomes across routine clinical practice. This survey evaluated the durability of patient-reported improvements among a real-world cohort of patients with LBP who responded to 60-day PNS.

Methods: A cross-sectional follow-up survey was administered to patients who previously responded to 60-day PNS targeting the lumbar medial branch nerves. Outcomes assessed included patient-reported percent pain relief and impression of change in quality of life (QoL), physical function, mood, and sleep. Participants also reported use or avoidance of other LBP treatments or interventions since completing 60-day PNS.

Results: The survey was completed by 602 participants, with follow-up durations ranging from 6 to 68 months. Overall, 79% (475/602) of participants required no radiofrequency ablation (RFA), permanent implant, or surgery following 60-day PNS. Among participants who avoided subsequent interventions, 79% (376/475) reported durable improvements in at least one domain (≥ 50% pain relief and/or clinically meaningful improvement of QoL, physical function, mood, and/or sleep) at follow-up. Among participants without a prior permanent neurostimulator implant, 92% (309/336) of those who sought to avoid permanent implantation succeeded. Among those without prior low back surgery who wanted to avoid it, 95% (353/370) avoided surgery through follow‑up.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that patients with LBP who respond to percutaneous 60-day PNS may experience durable relief, with benefits sustained by some for 5+ years. Participants reported reductions in pain leading to improvements in other health domains, and avoidance of subsequent interventions, including surgery, permanent implants, and/or RFA, through long-term follow-up, highlighting the potential use of percutaneous 60-day PNS as a minimally invasive, short-term treatment capable of producing long-lasting benefits in patients with LBP.

经皮60天周围神经刺激后长达5年的腰痛的持久结果和干预避免。
简介:腰痛(LBP)是世界范围内致残的主要原因,治疗通常需要有创性干预,这有很大的风险和经济负担。虽然先前的研究表明经皮60天周围神经刺激(PNS)后的持久益处,但需要真实世界的数据来表征常规临床实践的长期结果。本研究评估了现实世界中对60天PNS有反应的LBP患者报告的改善的持久性。方法:对先前针对腰内支神经进行60天PNS治疗的患者进行横断面随访调查。评估的结果包括患者报告的疼痛缓解百分比和生活质量(QoL)、身体功能、情绪和睡眠的变化印象。参与者还报告在完成60天PNS后使用或避免其他LBP治疗或干预措施。结果:共602名参与者完成调查,随访时间6 ~ 68个月。总体而言,79%(475/602)的参与者在60天PNS后不需要射频消融(RFA)、永久植入物或手术。在避免后续干预的参与者中,79%(376/475)报告在随访中至少有一个领域(≥50%的疼痛缓解和/或临床意义上的生活质量、身体功能、情绪和/或睡眠改善)持续改善。在之前没有永久性神经刺激器植入的参与者中,92%(309/336)的人试图避免永久性植入成功。在之前没有做过腰背部手术的患者中,95%(353/370)通过随访避免了手术。结论:这些研究结果表明,对经皮60天PNS有反应的LBP患者可能会经历持久的缓解,其中一些患者的获益可持续5年以上。参与者报告说,通过长期随访,疼痛的减轻导致了其他健康领域的改善,并避免了后续干预措施,包括手术、永久性植入物和/或RFA,强调了经皮60天PNS作为一种微创、短期治疗方法的潜在应用,能够为LBP患者带来持久的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain and Therapy
Pain and Therapy CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
110
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pain and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of pain therapies and pain-related devices. Studies relating to diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged. Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, acute pain, cancer pain, chronic pain, headache and migraine, neuropathic pain, opioids, palliative care and pain ethics, peri- and post-operative pain as well as rheumatic pain and fibromyalgia. The journal is of interest to a broad audience of pharmaceutical and healthcare professionals and publishes original research, reviews, case reports, trial protocols, short communications such as commentaries and editorials, and letters. The journal is read by a global audience and receives submissions from around the world. Pain and Therapy will consider all scientifically sound research be it positive, confirmatory or negative data. Submissions are welcomed whether they relate to an international and/or a country-specific audience, something that is crucially important when researchers are trying to target more specific patient populations. This inclusive approach allows the journal to assist in the dissemination of all scientifically and ethically sound research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书