Prognostic Role of Copeptin, H-FABP, and TTE in Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emergency Medicine International Pub Date : 2026-06-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1155/emmi/9544238
Huseyin Furkan Kucukbezirci, Seda Ozkan, Eser Durmaz, Fatih Cakmak, Ibrahim Ikizceli, Dildar Konukoglu, Gokcan Aman, Afsin İpekci
{"title":"Prognostic Role of Copeptin, H-FABP, and TTE in Pulmonary Embolism in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Huseyin Furkan Kucukbezirci, Seda Ozkan, Eser Durmaz, Fatih Cakmak, Ibrahim Ikizceli, Dildar Konukoglu, Gokcan Aman, Afsin İpekci","doi":"10.1155/emmi/9544238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a major diagnostic and prognostic challenge in emergency departments due to its heterogeneous clinical presentation and potentially high mortality. Although echocardiography and conventional cardiac biomarkers are commonly used in clinical practice, the additional prognostic value of novel biomarkers such as copeptin and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) requires further investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This exploratory prospective study (March 2021-September 2022) included adult patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with acute PE confirmed by radiological imaging in the emergency department. Patients with chronic/unconfirmed PE, incomplete data, or those referred from external centers were excluded. The primary analysis compared survivors and nonsurvivors at 30 days to evaluate the prognostic value of copeptin, H-FABP, and echocardiographic parameters. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed after diagnosis to assess right heart function and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), right ventricular/left ventricular ratio (RV/LV), right and left ventricular end-diastolic diameters (RV-EDD and LV-EDD), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). Biomarkers (troponin, pro-BNP, D-dimer, copeptin, and H-FABP) were analyzed using standard laboratory assays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 88 patients were analyzed. Although H-FABP and copeptin levels were higher in nonsurvivors, these differences were not statistically significant for predicting 30-day mortality. Echocardiographic parameters-particularly PAP, RV-EDD, and RV/LV-were significantly associated with the severity of right ventricular dysfunction and clinical outcomes (<i>p</i> < 0.05). In multivariable logistic regression analysis copeptin, H-FABP, PESI score, ICU admission, RV-EDD, and LV-EDD remained independently associated with 30-day mortality. Cut-off values were determined by ROC analysis using the Youden index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although biomarkers were not significant as continuous variables, exploratory categorized analysis based on cut-off values suggested a potential association with mortality. Rapid bedside echocardiography combined with appropriate biomarker testing may improve risk stratification in patients with PE in emergency settings, while larger studies are needed to clarify the role of these biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":11528,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine International","volume":"2026 ","pages":"9544238"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13312803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/emmi/9544238","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a major diagnostic and prognostic challenge in emergency departments due to its heterogeneous clinical presentation and potentially high mortality. Although echocardiography and conventional cardiac biomarkers are commonly used in clinical practice, the additional prognostic value of novel biomarkers such as copeptin and heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (H-FABP) requires further investigation.

Methods: This exploratory prospective study (March 2021-September 2022) included adult patients (≥ 18 years) diagnosed with acute PE confirmed by radiological imaging in the emergency department. Patients with chronic/unconfirmed PE, incomplete data, or those referred from external centers were excluded. The primary analysis compared survivors and nonsurvivors at 30 days to evaluate the prognostic value of copeptin, H-FABP, and echocardiographic parameters. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed after diagnosis to assess right heart function and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), right ventricular/left ventricular ratio (RV/LV), right and left ventricular end-diastolic diameters (RV-EDD and LV-EDD), and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE). Biomarkers (troponin, pro-BNP, D-dimer, copeptin, and H-FABP) were analyzed using standard laboratory assays and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The primary outcome was 30-day mortality.

Results: A total of 88 patients were analyzed. Although H-FABP and copeptin levels were higher in nonsurvivors, these differences were not statistically significant for predicting 30-day mortality. Echocardiographic parameters-particularly PAP, RV-EDD, and RV/LV-were significantly associated with the severity of right ventricular dysfunction and clinical outcomes (p < 0.05). In multivariable logistic regression analysis copeptin, H-FABP, PESI score, ICU admission, RV-EDD, and LV-EDD remained independently associated with 30-day mortality. Cut-off values were determined by ROC analysis using the Youden index.

Conclusions: Although biomarkers were not significant as continuous variables, exploratory categorized analysis based on cut-off values suggested a potential association with mortality. Rapid bedside echocardiography combined with appropriate biomarker testing may improve risk stratification in patients with PE in emergency settings, while larger studies are needed to clarify the role of these biomarkers.

Copeptin、H-FABP和TTE在急诊科肺栓塞中的预后作用
背景:肺栓塞(PE)由于其异质性的临床表现和潜在的高死亡率,仍然是急诊科诊断和预后的主要挑战。尽管超声心动图和传统的心脏生物标志物在临床实践中被广泛使用,但新型生物标志物如copeptin和心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白(H-FABP)的额外预后价值需要进一步研究。方法:本探索性前瞻性研究(2021年3月- 2022年9月)纳入急诊科经影像学证实诊断为急性PE的成年患者(≥18岁)。慢性/未经证实的PE患者、数据不完整或从外部中心转介的患者被排除在外。初步分析比较了30天的幸存者和非幸存者,以评估copeptin、H-FABP和超声心动图参数的预后价值。诊断后行经胸超声心动图(TTE)评估右心功能、肺动脉压(PAP)、右心室/左心室比(RV/LV)、左右心室舒张末期内径(RV- edd和LV- edd)、三尖瓣环平面收缩漂移(TAPSE)。生物标志物(肌钙蛋白、前bnp、d -二聚体、copeptin和H-FABP)采用标准实验室测定和酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行分析。主要终点为30天死亡率。结果:共分析88例患者。虽然H-FABP和copeptin水平在非幸存者中较高,但这些差异在预测30天死亡率方面没有统计学意义。超声心动图参数——尤其是PAP、RV- edd和RV/ lv——与右室功能障碍的严重程度和临床结果显著相关(p < 0.05)。在多变量logistic回归分析中,copeptin、H-FABP、PESI评分、ICU入院、RV-EDD和LV-EDD仍然与30天死亡率独立相关。采用约登指数进行ROC分析,确定临界值。结论:虽然生物标志物作为连续变量不显著,但基于临界值的探索性分类分析表明与死亡率有潜在的关联。快速床边超声心动图结合适当的生物标志物检测可以改善急诊PE患者的风险分层,但需要更大规模的研究来阐明这些生物标志物的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine International
Emergency Medicine International EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine International is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for doctors, nurses, paramedics and ambulance staff. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to prehospital care, disaster preparedness and response, acute medical and paediatric emergencies, critical care, sports medicine, wound care, and toxicology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书