Postoperative complications following simple cystectomy for radiation-induced bladder dysfunction compared to radical cystectomy: A matched cohort study.

IF 1.7 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-22 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2025.0163
Paweł Lipowski, Adam Ostrowski, Jan Adamowicz, Anastazja Zaigrajewa, Przemysław Jasiewicz, Filip Kowalski, Tomasz Drewa, Kajetan Juszczak
{"title":"Postoperative complications following simple cystectomy for radiation-induced bladder dysfunction compared to radical cystectomy: A matched cohort study.","authors":"Paweł Lipowski, Adam Ostrowski, Jan Adamowicz, Anastazja Zaigrajewa, Przemysław Jasiewicz, Filip Kowalski, Tomasz Drewa, Kajetan Juszczak","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2025.0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simple cystectomy (SC) for radiation-induced bladder dysfunction (RIBD) is occasionally performed, yet data regarding perioperative outcomes are limited. This study aimed to compare perioperative complications following SC for RIBD with radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic cystectomy with ureterocutaneostomy between 2016 and 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied separately for cT1-cT2 stage tumors, cT3-cT4 stage tumors, and for SC group vesicoenteric fistula patients. Outcomes were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification at 30 and 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 257 patients were included in the study: 25 SC for RIBD and 232 RC for BC. Prior to matching, SC patients had significantly higher rates of CD grade ≥3 complications at 30 days (44% vs 22.4%, p <0.001), higher reoperation rates (47.8% vs 11.6%, p <0.001), and prolonged hospital stays (15 vs 9 days, p = 0.002). After matching, SC patients continued to demonstrate more severe complications, especially compared to cT1-T2 RC patients (CD ≥3 complications: 47.1% vs 11.8%, p = 0.057; reoperations: 56.2% vs 5.9%, p = 0.002). In patients with vesicoenteric fistula after matching, CD complication rates at 30 days did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.130), 90-day complication rates were comparable (p = 0.968), and reoperations occurred significantly more often in the SC group (61.5% vs 6.7%; p = 0.004). Study limitations include the retrospective single-center design, small SC group size and urinary diversion type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Due to high morbidity, non-oncological cystectomy for RIBD should be limited to selected cases and managed in experienced, multidisciplinary centers. Urinary diversion without cystectomy may be a safer alternative.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"79 2","pages":"90-102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13312187/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2025.0163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Simple cystectomy (SC) for radiation-induced bladder dysfunction (RIBD) is occasionally performed, yet data regarding perioperative outcomes are limited. This study aimed to compare perioperative complications following SC for RIBD with radical cystectomy (RC) for bladder cancer.

Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic cystectomy with ureterocutaneostomy between 2016 and 2024. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied separately for cT1-cT2 stage tumors, cT3-cT4 stage tumors, and for SC group vesicoenteric fistula patients. Outcomes were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification at 30 and 90 days.

Results: In total, 257 patients were included in the study: 25 SC for RIBD and 232 RC for BC. Prior to matching, SC patients had significantly higher rates of CD grade ≥3 complications at 30 days (44% vs 22.4%, p <0.001), higher reoperation rates (47.8% vs 11.6%, p <0.001), and prolonged hospital stays (15 vs 9 days, p = 0.002). After matching, SC patients continued to demonstrate more severe complications, especially compared to cT1-T2 RC patients (CD ≥3 complications: 47.1% vs 11.8%, p = 0.057; reoperations: 56.2% vs 5.9%, p = 0.002). In patients with vesicoenteric fistula after matching, CD complication rates at 30 days did not differ significantly between groups (p = 0.130), 90-day complication rates were comparable (p = 0.968), and reoperations occurred significantly more often in the SC group (61.5% vs 6.7%; p = 0.004). Study limitations include the retrospective single-center design, small SC group size and urinary diversion type.

Conclusions: Due to high morbidity, non-oncological cystectomy for RIBD should be limited to selected cases and managed in experienced, multidisciplinary centers. Urinary diversion without cystectomy may be a safer alternative.

单纯膀胱切除术治疗放射性膀胱功能障碍与根治性膀胱切除术的术后并发症比较:一项匹配队列研究。
简介:单纯膀胱切除术(SC)治疗放射性膀胱功能障碍(RIBD)偶尔会被实施,但有关围手术期结果的数据有限。本研究旨在比较SC治疗RIBD与根治性膀胱切除术(RC)治疗膀胱癌的围手术期并发症。材料和方法:我们对2016年至2024年间行腹腔镜膀胱切除术并输尿管套管造口术的患者进行回顾性单中心分析。倾向评分匹配(PSM)分别应用于cT1-cT2期肿瘤、cT3-cT4期肿瘤和SC组膀胱肠瘘患者。在30天和90天采用Clavien-Dindo (CD)分级对结果进行评估。结果:共有257例患者纳入研究:25例RIBD SC和232例BC RC。在配对之前,SC患者在30天内CD级≥3级并发症的发生率明显更高(44%对22.4%)。结论:由于发病率高,非肿瘤性膀胱切除术治疗RIBD应限于选定的病例,并在经验丰富的多学科中心进行管理。不切除膀胱的尿转移可能是一种更安全的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书