Highlighting best practices to advance next-generation risk assessment of cosmetic ingredients.

NAM journal Pub Date : 2025-04-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.namjnl.2025.100020
Eric Vaillancourt, Alaa Afdal Mohamed, Jay Ansell, Takao Ashikaga, Ahmed Ayad, Hadeel Ayman, Marize Valadares Campos, Han-Sheng Chien, Arianna Giusti, Masato Hatao, Frances Hill, Abeer Khattab, Reinhard Kreiling, Ah Young Lee, Miao Li, Pinpin Lin, Yen-Chun Lin, Victor Mencarelli, Stanley Milstein, Beta P Montemayor, Carolina Motter Catarino, Rawda Negm, Gladys Ouédraogo, Eun Jae Park, Mustafa Varçin, Tzu-Yi Yang, Yu Janet Zang, Matthew Philip Dent
{"title":"Highlighting best practices to advance next-generation risk assessment of cosmetic ingredients.","authors":"Eric Vaillancourt, Alaa Afdal Mohamed, Jay Ansell, Takao Ashikaga, Ahmed Ayad, Hadeel Ayman, Marize Valadares Campos, Han-Sheng Chien, Arianna Giusti, Masato Hatao, Frances Hill, Abeer Khattab, Reinhard Kreiling, Ah Young Lee, Miao Li, Pinpin Lin, Yen-Chun Lin, Victor Mencarelli, Stanley Milstein, Beta P Montemayor, Carolina Motter Catarino, Rawda Negm, Gladys Ouédraogo, Eun Jae Park, Mustafa Varçin, Tzu-Yi Yang, Yu Janet Zang, Matthew Philip Dent","doi":"10.1016/j.namjnl.2025.100020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Public expectations and regulatory demands have driven a paradigm shift in cosmetic ingredient safety assessment. Next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) and new approach methodologies (NAMs) provide an opportunity to implement alternative procedures which are more ethical and biologically-relevant, have the potential to become more cost-effective and time-efficient, and are at least as protective of human health as traditional, animal-based approaches. However, the sheer number and diversity of the rapidly-evolving NAMs currently available can be confusing and overwhelming to safety assessors. To successfully transition from principles to routine application, NAMs must gain acceptance within safety assessment communities. Harmonizing NAMs and establishing standardized risk assessment workflows are paramount to gaining regulatory acceptance. Consequently, the International Cooperation on Cosmetics Regulation (ICCR) has tasked a team of scientists from regulatory authorities and the cosmetic industry to define best practices which align with the ICCR principles of NGRA for cosmetic ingredients, to help advance the acceptance and use of NAMs in cosmetic safety assessment and, where applicable, regulatory decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":520522,"journal":{"name":"NAM journal","volume":"1 ","pages":"100020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13288993/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAM journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.namjnl.2025.100020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Public expectations and regulatory demands have driven a paradigm shift in cosmetic ingredient safety assessment. Next-generation risk assessment (NGRA) and new approach methodologies (NAMs) provide an opportunity to implement alternative procedures which are more ethical and biologically-relevant, have the potential to become more cost-effective and time-efficient, and are at least as protective of human health as traditional, animal-based approaches. However, the sheer number and diversity of the rapidly-evolving NAMs currently available can be confusing and overwhelming to safety assessors. To successfully transition from principles to routine application, NAMs must gain acceptance within safety assessment communities. Harmonizing NAMs and establishing standardized risk assessment workflows are paramount to gaining regulatory acceptance. Consequently, the International Cooperation on Cosmetics Regulation (ICCR) has tasked a team of scientists from regulatory authorities and the cosmetic industry to define best practices which align with the ICCR principles of NGRA for cosmetic ingredients, to help advance the acceptance and use of NAMs in cosmetic safety assessment and, where applicable, regulatory decision-making.

强调推进下一代化妆品成分风险评估的最佳实践。
公众的期望和监管要求推动了化妆品成分安全评估的范式转变。下一代风险评估(NGRA)和新方法方法(NAMs)为实施更具伦理性和生物学相关的替代程序提供了机会,这些程序有可能变得更具成本效益和时间效率,并且至少与传统的基于动物的方法一样保护人类健康。然而,目前可用的快速发展的名称的数量和多样性可能会使安全评估人员感到困惑和不知所措。为了成功地从原则过渡到常规应用,NAMs必须获得安全评估团体的认可。协调命名和建立标准化的风险评估工作流程对于获得监管认可至关重要。因此,国际化妆品法规合作组织(ICCR)已指派一个由监管机构和化妆品行业的科学家组成的团队,为化妆品成分制定符合ICCR NGRA原则的最佳做法,以帮助促进化妆品安全评估中NAMs的接受和使用,并在适用的情况下进行监管决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书