{"title":"Minimally Invasive Fixation of a Distal Fibula Fracture With an Intramedullary Nail.","authors":"Jothi Murali-Larson","doi":"10.1177/26350254261452269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advantages of using an intramedullary (IM) nail over a lateral plate for fixation of distal fibula fractures include the ability to allow for earlier weightbearing and return to sport, smaller incisions, and decreased hardware prominence. When comparing a fibular nail with an IM screw, the nail allows for syndesmosis fixation through the device and imparts rotational stability. Long-term studies support the viability and clinical outcomes of using an IM nail. In this technique video, a case is presented to illustrate the use of an IM nail for fixation of a distal fibula fracture.</p><p><strong>Indications: </strong>Distal fibula fractures should be treated operatively in the following cases: open fractures, bimalleolar fractures, or lateral malleolar fractures with medial clear space widening, displacement >3 mm, or decreased tib-fib overlap, increased talocrural angle, any talar displacement, fracture-dislocation, or nonunion. When treating these fractures operatively, it is crucial to get an anatomic reduction, as this will lead to a satisfactory outcome. By restoring the anatomy, the talar shift is decreased, and a normal tibiotalar contact area is approached.</p><p><strong>Technique description: </strong>Percutaneous incisions are made around the fracture to place a clamp and hold anatomic reduction. Once reduced, a small incision is made 1cm distal to the fibular tip and in line with its axis. The start point is checked with the K-wire on anteroposterior and lateral views. An opening reamer is used, followed by a flexible guidewire and then a proximal reamer. Talons are deployed once the appropriate position is confirmed, and interlocking screws are placed through the guide. Syndesmosis fixation is added if necessary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate for achieving good outcomes is high at 90%. Patients should be counseled that their braking time while driving is normal at around 9 weeks and that overall recovery is about 2 years.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>This technique should not be used if the 6.2-mm opening reamer will breach the cortex, and should not be used if a plate will provide superior fixation. Like with any nailing procedure, obtaining and maintaining the reduction is paramount. A proper start point is critical for optimal fixation.</p><p><strong>Patient consent disclosure statement: </strong>The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.</p>","PeriodicalId":520531,"journal":{"name":"Video journal of sports medicine","volume":"6 3","pages":"26350254261452269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13305480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254261452269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Advantages of using an intramedullary (IM) nail over a lateral plate for fixation of distal fibula fractures include the ability to allow for earlier weightbearing and return to sport, smaller incisions, and decreased hardware prominence. When comparing a fibular nail with an IM screw, the nail allows for syndesmosis fixation through the device and imparts rotational stability. Long-term studies support the viability and clinical outcomes of using an IM nail. In this technique video, a case is presented to illustrate the use of an IM nail for fixation of a distal fibula fracture.
Indications: Distal fibula fractures should be treated operatively in the following cases: open fractures, bimalleolar fractures, or lateral malleolar fractures with medial clear space widening, displacement >3 mm, or decreased tib-fib overlap, increased talocrural angle, any talar displacement, fracture-dislocation, or nonunion. When treating these fractures operatively, it is crucial to get an anatomic reduction, as this will lead to a satisfactory outcome. By restoring the anatomy, the talar shift is decreased, and a normal tibiotalar contact area is approached.
Technique description: Percutaneous incisions are made around the fracture to place a clamp and hold anatomic reduction. Once reduced, a small incision is made 1cm distal to the fibular tip and in line with its axis. The start point is checked with the K-wire on anteroposterior and lateral views. An opening reamer is used, followed by a flexible guidewire and then a proximal reamer. Talons are deployed once the appropriate position is confirmed, and interlocking screws are placed through the guide. Syndesmosis fixation is added if necessary.
Results: The success rate for achieving good outcomes is high at 90%. Patients should be counseled that their braking time while driving is normal at around 9 weeks and that overall recovery is about 2 years.
Discussion/conclusion: This technique should not be used if the 6.2-mm opening reamer will breach the cortex, and should not be used if a plate will provide superior fixation. Like with any nailing procedure, obtaining and maintaining the reduction is paramount. A proper start point is critical for optimal fixation.
Patient consent disclosure statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.