Minimally Invasive Fixation of a Distal Fibula Fracture With an Intramedullary Nail.

Video journal of sports medicine Pub Date : 2026-06-25 eCollection Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1177/26350254261452269
Jothi Murali-Larson
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Fixation of a Distal Fibula Fracture With an Intramedullary Nail.","authors":"Jothi Murali-Larson","doi":"10.1177/26350254261452269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advantages of using an intramedullary (IM) nail over a lateral plate for fixation of distal fibula fractures include the ability to allow for earlier weightbearing and return to sport, smaller incisions, and decreased hardware prominence. When comparing a fibular nail with an IM screw, the nail allows for syndesmosis fixation through the device and imparts rotational stability. Long-term studies support the viability and clinical outcomes of using an IM nail. In this technique video, a case is presented to illustrate the use of an IM nail for fixation of a distal fibula fracture.</p><p><strong>Indications: </strong>Distal fibula fractures should be treated operatively in the following cases: open fractures, bimalleolar fractures, or lateral malleolar fractures with medial clear space widening, displacement >3 mm, or decreased tib-fib overlap, increased talocrural angle, any talar displacement, fracture-dislocation, or nonunion. When treating these fractures operatively, it is crucial to get an anatomic reduction, as this will lead to a satisfactory outcome. By restoring the anatomy, the talar shift is decreased, and a normal tibiotalar contact area is approached.</p><p><strong>Technique description: </strong>Percutaneous incisions are made around the fracture to place a clamp and hold anatomic reduction. Once reduced, a small incision is made 1cm distal to the fibular tip and in line with its axis. The start point is checked with the K-wire on anteroposterior and lateral views. An opening reamer is used, followed by a flexible guidewire and then a proximal reamer. Talons are deployed once the appropriate position is confirmed, and interlocking screws are placed through the guide. Syndesmosis fixation is added if necessary.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate for achieving good outcomes is high at 90%. Patients should be counseled that their braking time while driving is normal at around 9 weeks and that overall recovery is about 2 years.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>This technique should not be used if the 6.2-mm opening reamer will breach the cortex, and should not be used if a plate will provide superior fixation. Like with any nailing procedure, obtaining and maintaining the reduction is paramount. A proper start point is critical for optimal fixation.</p><p><strong>Patient consent disclosure statement: </strong>The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.</p>","PeriodicalId":520531,"journal":{"name":"Video journal of sports medicine","volume":"6 3","pages":"26350254261452269"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13305480/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26350254261452269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advantages of using an intramedullary (IM) nail over a lateral plate for fixation of distal fibula fractures include the ability to allow for earlier weightbearing and return to sport, smaller incisions, and decreased hardware prominence. When comparing a fibular nail with an IM screw, the nail allows for syndesmosis fixation through the device and imparts rotational stability. Long-term studies support the viability and clinical outcomes of using an IM nail. In this technique video, a case is presented to illustrate the use of an IM nail for fixation of a distal fibula fracture.

Indications: Distal fibula fractures should be treated operatively in the following cases: open fractures, bimalleolar fractures, or lateral malleolar fractures with medial clear space widening, displacement >3 mm, or decreased tib-fib overlap, increased talocrural angle, any talar displacement, fracture-dislocation, or nonunion. When treating these fractures operatively, it is crucial to get an anatomic reduction, as this will lead to a satisfactory outcome. By restoring the anatomy, the talar shift is decreased, and a normal tibiotalar contact area is approached.

Technique description: Percutaneous incisions are made around the fracture to place a clamp and hold anatomic reduction. Once reduced, a small incision is made 1cm distal to the fibular tip and in line with its axis. The start point is checked with the K-wire on anteroposterior and lateral views. An opening reamer is used, followed by a flexible guidewire and then a proximal reamer. Talons are deployed once the appropriate position is confirmed, and interlocking screws are placed through the guide. Syndesmosis fixation is added if necessary.

Results: The success rate for achieving good outcomes is high at 90%. Patients should be counseled that their braking time while driving is normal at around 9 weeks and that overall recovery is about 2 years.

Discussion/conclusion: This technique should not be used if the 6.2-mm opening reamer will breach the cortex, and should not be used if a plate will provide superior fixation. Like with any nailing procedure, obtaining and maintaining the reduction is paramount. A proper start point is critical for optimal fixation.

Patient consent disclosure statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

髓内钉微创固定腓骨远端骨折。
背景:使用髓内钉(IM)而不是外侧钢板固定腓骨远端骨折的优点包括能够更早地负重和恢复运动,切口更小,并且减少了硬件突出。当比较腓骨钉与IM螺钉时,该钉允许通过该装置固定联合,并赋予旋转稳定性。长期研究支持使用内钉的可行性和临床结果。在本技术视频中,介绍了一个使用IM钉固定腓骨远端骨折的病例。适应症:腓骨远端骨折应在以下情况下进行手术治疗:开放性骨折,双踝骨折,或外踝骨折,内侧间隙扩大,移位bbb3mm,或胫骨-fib重叠减少,距骨角增加,任何距骨移位,骨折脱位或不愈合。当手术治疗这些骨折时,解剖复位是至关重要的,因为这将导致令人满意的结果。通过恢复解剖,距骨移位减少,并接近正常的胫距接触区。技术描述:在骨折周围进行经皮切口,放置夹子并保持解剖复位。一旦复位,在腓骨尖端远端1cm处做一个与腓骨轴一致的小切口。在正位和侧位视图上用k线检查起始点。使用开口扩眼器,然后是柔性导丝,然后是近端扩眼器。一旦确定合适的位置,就展开爪,并通过导轨放置联锁螺钉。如有必要,可增加韧带联合固定。结果:获得良好疗效的成功率高达90%。患者应被告知,他们在驾驶时的制动时间在9周左右是正常的,整体恢复约为2年。讨论/结论:如果6.2 mm开口铰刀会破坏皮质,则不应使用该技术,如果钢板能提供更好的固定,则不应使用该技术。与任何钉钉程序一样,获得和保持复位是至关重要的。正确的起始点对最佳固定至关重要。患者同意披露声明:作者证明已获得本出版物中出现的任何患者的同意。如果患者的身份是可识别的,作者必须在提交的文件中附上患者的免责声明或其他书面批准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书