In vitro models for gonadal and placental toxicity: A review and industry survey.

NAM journal Pub Date : 2025-09-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.namjnl.2025.100052
Samuel Madureira Silva, Steven Van Cruchten, Freddy Van Goethem, Tamara Vanhaecke, Ellen Goossens, Yoni Baert
{"title":"<i>In vitro</i> models for gonadal and placental toxicity: A review and industry survey.","authors":"Samuel Madureira Silva, Steven Van Cruchten, Freddy Van Goethem, Tamara Vanhaecke, Ellen Goossens, Yoni Baert","doi":"10.1016/j.namjnl.2025.100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, there has been a significant push towards the development of animal-free methods in toxicology. Despite this progress, the adoption of such methods in safety assessment practices remains limited, particularly in the context of gonadal and placental toxicity. This paper reviews current <i>in vitro</i> models relevant to gonadal (gametogenesis and steroidogenesis) and placental biology, and potentially applicable in developmental and reproductive toxicology (DART). Additionally, we present the results of a survey conducted among DART experts (<i>n</i> = 16), examining current practices and perceptions in industry regarding these <i>in vitro</i> methodologies. The findings indicate a predominant reliance on animal models, largely driven by regulatory requirements, despite concerns about their ability to reliably predict human outcomes. Respondents reported limited familiarity with and confidence in available <i>in vitro</i> models for gonadal and placental toxicity, yet expressed optimism about their future integration. These findings underscore the need for increased awareness of gonadal and placental <i>in vitro</i> models, particularly among DART risk assessors, to facilitate a shift toward more reliable and human relevant risk assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":520522,"journal":{"name":"NAM journal","volume":"1 ","pages":"100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13289032/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NAM journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.namjnl.2025.100052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a significant push towards the development of animal-free methods in toxicology. Despite this progress, the adoption of such methods in safety assessment practices remains limited, particularly in the context of gonadal and placental toxicity. This paper reviews current in vitro models relevant to gonadal (gametogenesis and steroidogenesis) and placental biology, and potentially applicable in developmental and reproductive toxicology (DART). Additionally, we present the results of a survey conducted among DART experts (n = 16), examining current practices and perceptions in industry regarding these in vitro methodologies. The findings indicate a predominant reliance on animal models, largely driven by regulatory requirements, despite concerns about their ability to reliably predict human outcomes. Respondents reported limited familiarity with and confidence in available in vitro models for gonadal and placental toxicity, yet expressed optimism about their future integration. These findings underscore the need for increased awareness of gonadal and placental in vitro models, particularly among DART risk assessors, to facilitate a shift toward more reliable and human relevant risk assessments.

性腺和胎盘毒性体外模型:综述和行业调查。
近年来,在毒理学研究中,无动物实验方法的发展得到了极大的推动。尽管取得了这些进展,但在安全性评估实践中采用这种方法仍然有限,特别是在性腺和胎盘毒性方面。本文综述了目前与性腺(配子发生和甾体发生)和胎盘生物学相关的体外模型,以及在发育和生殖毒理学(DART)方面的潜在应用。此外,我们提出了在DART专家(n = 16)中进行的一项调查的结果,检查了有关这些体外方法的当前行业实践和看法。研究结果表明,主要依赖于动物模型,这在很大程度上是由监管要求驱动的,尽管人们担心它们能否可靠地预测人类的结果。受访者表示对性腺和胎盘毒性体外模型的熟悉程度和信心有限,但对其未来的整合表示乐观。这些发现强调需要提高对性腺和胎盘体外模型的认识,特别是在DART风险评估人员中,以促进向更可靠和与人类相关的风险评估的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书