Antibiotic course frequency and recovery strategies alter gut microbial composition and metabolism.

IF 6.4 Q1 ECOLOGY
ISME communications Pub Date : 2026-06-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/ismeco/ycag145
Kaoutar Abaakil, Zhigang Liu, Mu Wang, Elina Kuznecova, Ming S C Sung, Julian R Marchesi, Michaela A Mausz, Jia V Li
{"title":"Antibiotic course frequency and recovery strategies alter gut microbial composition and metabolism.","authors":"Kaoutar Abaakil, Zhigang Liu, Mu Wang, Elina Kuznecova, Ming S C Sung, Julian R Marchesi, Michaela A Mausz, Jia V Li","doi":"10.1093/ismeco/ycag145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotics profoundly alter the gut microbiome, but how exposure frequencies shape microbial recovery remains unclear. The effectiveness of post-antibiotic interventions, e.g. probiotics or autologous fecal microbiota transplantation, (aFMT) requires further exploration. This study investigated how antibiotic course timing and recovery strategies influence gut microbiome and metabolism in male Wistar rats. A single oral dose of vancomycin-ciprofloxacin (VC) caused rapid urinary and fecal metabolic shifts within 8-12 h and reduced bacterial α-diversity in cecal and colonic contents. When three VC courses were administered at regular (every 3 weeks; VCr) or irregular (1-3 weeks; VCi) intervals, VCr showed greater suppression of fecal α-diversity and stronger disruption of amino acid and host-microbial co-metabolism than VCi. Over the 3-week recovery period, VCr exhibited slower fecal α-diversity restoration; at week 3, β-diversity remained significantly different between groups, and cecal butyrate levels were persistently reduced in VCr. Both groups showed elevated levels of 5-aminovalerate in feces and colon compared with controls, whereas only VCi showed reductions in jejunal and ileal amino acids. Probiotics or aFMT had limited influence on small intestinal alterations, though aFMT accelerated fecal α-diversity recovery, and both interventions promoted partial normalization of fecal amino acids and 5-aminovalerate, without achieving complete restoration. Overall, shorter antibiotic intervals exerted stronger effects on the small intestinal luminal chemical environment, whereas longer intervals led to greater suppression of colonic and fecal microbial metabolism. Probiotics and aFMT supported selective metabolic recovery without fully reversing antibiotics-induced disturbances, highlighting the need for more targeted restoration strategies across gastrointestinal regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73516,"journal":{"name":"ISME communications","volume":"6 1","pages":"ycag145"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13310174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ISME communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ismeco/ycag145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibiotics profoundly alter the gut microbiome, but how exposure frequencies shape microbial recovery remains unclear. The effectiveness of post-antibiotic interventions, e.g. probiotics or autologous fecal microbiota transplantation, (aFMT) requires further exploration. This study investigated how antibiotic course timing and recovery strategies influence gut microbiome and metabolism in male Wistar rats. A single oral dose of vancomycin-ciprofloxacin (VC) caused rapid urinary and fecal metabolic shifts within 8-12 h and reduced bacterial α-diversity in cecal and colonic contents. When three VC courses were administered at regular (every 3 weeks; VCr) or irregular (1-3 weeks; VCi) intervals, VCr showed greater suppression of fecal α-diversity and stronger disruption of amino acid and host-microbial co-metabolism than VCi. Over the 3-week recovery period, VCr exhibited slower fecal α-diversity restoration; at week 3, β-diversity remained significantly different between groups, and cecal butyrate levels were persistently reduced in VCr. Both groups showed elevated levels of 5-aminovalerate in feces and colon compared with controls, whereas only VCi showed reductions in jejunal and ileal amino acids. Probiotics or aFMT had limited influence on small intestinal alterations, though aFMT accelerated fecal α-diversity recovery, and both interventions promoted partial normalization of fecal amino acids and 5-aminovalerate, without achieving complete restoration. Overall, shorter antibiotic intervals exerted stronger effects on the small intestinal luminal chemical environment, whereas longer intervals led to greater suppression of colonic and fecal microbial metabolism. Probiotics and aFMT supported selective metabolic recovery without fully reversing antibiotics-induced disturbances, highlighting the need for more targeted restoration strategies across gastrointestinal regions.

抗生素疗程频率和恢复策略改变肠道微生物组成和代谢。
抗生素深刻地改变了肠道微生物群,但暴露频率如何影响微生物恢复尚不清楚。抗生素后干预的有效性,如益生菌或自体粪便微生物群移植(aFMT),需要进一步探索。本研究探讨了抗生素疗程时间和恢复策略对雄性Wistar大鼠肠道微生物群和代谢的影响。单次口服万古霉素-环丙沙星(VC)可在8-12 h内引起尿和粪便代谢的快速变化,并降低盲肠和结肠内容物中细菌α-多样性。当定期(每3周;VCr)或不定期(1-3周;VCi)给药3个VC疗程时,VCr比VCi对粪便α-多样性的抑制更大,对氨基酸和宿主-微生物共代谢的破坏更大。在3周的恢复期,VCr表现出较慢的粪便α-多样性恢复;第3周,各组间β-多样性仍有显著差异,VCr盲肠丁酸水平持续降低。与对照组相比,两组患者的粪便和结肠中5-氨基戊酸含量均有所升高,而只有VCi患者的空肠和回肠氨基酸含量有所降低。益生菌或aFMT对小肠改变的影响有限,尽管aFMT加速了粪便α-多样性的恢复,两种干预措施都促进了粪便氨基酸和5-氨基戊酸盐的部分正常化,但没有实现完全恢复。总体而言,较短的抗生素间隔对小肠化学环境的影响更强,而较长的抗生素间隔对结肠和粪便微生物代谢的抑制更大。益生菌和aFMT支持选择性代谢恢复,而不完全逆转抗生素引起的紊乱,强调需要更有针对性的胃肠道区域恢复策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书