Trainee-Led Case-Based Learning in Medical Oncology: A Feasibility Study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jonathon Vundum, Fiona Day
{"title":"Trainee-Led Case-Based Learning in Medical Oncology: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Jonathon Vundum, Fiona Day","doi":"10.1007/s13187-026-02932-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Case-based learning (CBL) is widely used in undergraduate medical education, with demonstrable benefits for students across multiple domains. There is a paucity of data in the post-graduate setting. A robust training program is essential for specialty trainees in medical oncology, yet dedicated educational opportunities are limited by a busy clinical environment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a post-graduate trainee-led CBL program within a Medical Oncology Department at a major cancer centre in Australia. All eligible participants (3 registrars, 1 clinical fellow, 2 nurse practitioners (NPs), 1 post-graduate student NP) were invited to attend weekly CBL sessions over a 20-week period. Session parameters, such as attendance and duration, were recorded. Feasibility was assessed using 4 of Bowen's key areas: acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. A questionnaire was completed by each participant following each session and on conclusion of the program. Researchers performed statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U tests and conducted thematic analyses on qualitative data. Of 20 scheduled sessions, 14 (70%) ran without cancellation. Attendance rate was 66%, with most absences being attributed to leave. Mean session duration was 61.4 min, with mean preparation time of 24.2 min per participant. Participant perceived value was high (9.1/10) and significantly higher with faculty medical oncologist attendance (9.7 vs. 8.8, p = 0.001). Acceptability scores were excellent (9.4/10). CBL sessions were rated significantly higher than concurrent educational opportunities (9.1 vs. 8.1, p < 0.001). Coding of the qualitative data within participant surveys identified the following themes: CBL sessions (1) stimulated relevant and beneficial discussion, (2) were perceived positively, (3) were negatively affected by other clinical commitments, (4) were enhanced by the presence of a faculty medical oncologist, (5) generated a safe space for collaborative learning, (6) were time-efficient and (7) provided self-study opportunities. A postgraduate, trainee-led CBL program in medical oncology is feasible and was well received at our centre. It offers a promising complement to traditional teaching in a rapidly evolving field where faculty oncologist-led educational opportunities may be limited. Future studies could focus on the potential for virtual implementation to allow for collaboration between centres, to the benefit of rural medical oncology trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-026-02932-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Case-based learning (CBL) is widely used in undergraduate medical education, with demonstrable benefits for students across multiple domains. There is a paucity of data in the post-graduate setting. A robust training program is essential for specialty trainees in medical oncology, yet dedicated educational opportunities are limited by a busy clinical environment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a post-graduate trainee-led CBL program within a Medical Oncology Department at a major cancer centre in Australia. All eligible participants (3 registrars, 1 clinical fellow, 2 nurse practitioners (NPs), 1 post-graduate student NP) were invited to attend weekly CBL sessions over a 20-week period. Session parameters, such as attendance and duration, were recorded. Feasibility was assessed using 4 of Bowen's key areas: acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. A questionnaire was completed by each participant following each session and on conclusion of the program. Researchers performed statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U tests and conducted thematic analyses on qualitative data. Of 20 scheduled sessions, 14 (70%) ran without cancellation. Attendance rate was 66%, with most absences being attributed to leave. Mean session duration was 61.4 min, with mean preparation time of 24.2 min per participant. Participant perceived value was high (9.1/10) and significantly higher with faculty medical oncologist attendance (9.7 vs. 8.8, p = 0.001). Acceptability scores were excellent (9.4/10). CBL sessions were rated significantly higher than concurrent educational opportunities (9.1 vs. 8.1, p < 0.001). Coding of the qualitative data within participant surveys identified the following themes: CBL sessions (1) stimulated relevant and beneficial discussion, (2) were perceived positively, (3) were negatively affected by other clinical commitments, (4) were enhanced by the presence of a faculty medical oncologist, (5) generated a safe space for collaborative learning, (6) were time-efficient and (7) provided self-study opportunities. A postgraduate, trainee-led CBL program in medical oncology is feasible and was well received at our centre. It offers a promising complement to traditional teaching in a rapidly evolving field where faculty oncologist-led educational opportunities may be limited. Future studies could focus on the potential for virtual implementation to allow for collaboration between centres, to the benefit of rural medical oncology trainees.

以实习生为主导的肿瘤医学案例学习的可行性研究。
基于案例的学习(CBL)广泛应用于本科医学教育,对多个领域的学生都有明显的好处。在研究生设置中数据缺乏。一个健全的培训计划是必不可少的专业学员在医学肿瘤学,但专门的教育机会是有限的繁忙的临床环境。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚某主要癌症中心肿瘤内科的研究生实习生领导的CBL项目的可行性。所有符合条件的参与者(3名登记员,1名临床研究员,2名执业护士(NPs), 1名研究生NP)被邀请参加为期20周的每周CBL会议。记录会话参数,如考勤和持续时间。可行性评估使用Bowen的4个关键领域:可接受性、需求、实施和实用性。每个参与者在每次会议结束后和项目结束时完成一份调查问卷。研究人员使用Mann-Whitney U测试进行统计分析,并对定性数据进行专题分析。在20个预定的会议中,14个(70%)没有取消。出勤率为66%,大多数缺勤是由于请假。平均疗程为61.4分钟,平均准备时间为24.2分钟。参与者的感知价值较高(9.1/10),并且随着肿瘤内科医生的出勤而显著升高(9.7比8.8,p = 0.001)。可接受性评分优秀(9.4/10)。CBL课程的评分显著高于并行教育机会(9.1比8.1,p .1)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书