{"title":"Trainee-Led Case-Based Learning in Medical Oncology: A Feasibility Study.","authors":"Jonathon Vundum, Fiona Day","doi":"10.1007/s13187-026-02932-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Case-based learning (CBL) is widely used in undergraduate medical education, with demonstrable benefits for students across multiple domains. There is a paucity of data in the post-graduate setting. A robust training program is essential for specialty trainees in medical oncology, yet dedicated educational opportunities are limited by a busy clinical environment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a post-graduate trainee-led CBL program within a Medical Oncology Department at a major cancer centre in Australia. All eligible participants (3 registrars, 1 clinical fellow, 2 nurse practitioners (NPs), 1 post-graduate student NP) were invited to attend weekly CBL sessions over a 20-week period. Session parameters, such as attendance and duration, were recorded. Feasibility was assessed using 4 of Bowen's key areas: acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. A questionnaire was completed by each participant following each session and on conclusion of the program. Researchers performed statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U tests and conducted thematic analyses on qualitative data. Of 20 scheduled sessions, 14 (70%) ran without cancellation. Attendance rate was 66%, with most absences being attributed to leave. Mean session duration was 61.4 min, with mean preparation time of 24.2 min per participant. Participant perceived value was high (9.1/10) and significantly higher with faculty medical oncologist attendance (9.7 vs. 8.8, p = 0.001). Acceptability scores were excellent (9.4/10). CBL sessions were rated significantly higher than concurrent educational opportunities (9.1 vs. 8.1, p < 0.001). Coding of the qualitative data within participant surveys identified the following themes: CBL sessions (1) stimulated relevant and beneficial discussion, (2) were perceived positively, (3) were negatively affected by other clinical commitments, (4) were enhanced by the presence of a faculty medical oncologist, (5) generated a safe space for collaborative learning, (6) were time-efficient and (7) provided self-study opportunities. A postgraduate, trainee-led CBL program in medical oncology is feasible and was well received at our centre. It offers a promising complement to traditional teaching in a rapidly evolving field where faculty oncologist-led educational opportunities may be limited. Future studies could focus on the potential for virtual implementation to allow for collaboration between centres, to the benefit of rural medical oncology trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-026-02932-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Case-based learning (CBL) is widely used in undergraduate medical education, with demonstrable benefits for students across multiple domains. There is a paucity of data in the post-graduate setting. A robust training program is essential for specialty trainees in medical oncology, yet dedicated educational opportunities are limited by a busy clinical environment. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of a post-graduate trainee-led CBL program within a Medical Oncology Department at a major cancer centre in Australia. All eligible participants (3 registrars, 1 clinical fellow, 2 nurse practitioners (NPs), 1 post-graduate student NP) were invited to attend weekly CBL sessions over a 20-week period. Session parameters, such as attendance and duration, were recorded. Feasibility was assessed using 4 of Bowen's key areas: acceptability, demand, implementation and practicality. A questionnaire was completed by each participant following each session and on conclusion of the program. Researchers performed statistical analysis using Mann-Whitney U tests and conducted thematic analyses on qualitative data. Of 20 scheduled sessions, 14 (70%) ran without cancellation. Attendance rate was 66%, with most absences being attributed to leave. Mean session duration was 61.4 min, with mean preparation time of 24.2 min per participant. Participant perceived value was high (9.1/10) and significantly higher with faculty medical oncologist attendance (9.7 vs. 8.8, p = 0.001). Acceptability scores were excellent (9.4/10). CBL sessions were rated significantly higher than concurrent educational opportunities (9.1 vs. 8.1, p < 0.001). Coding of the qualitative data within participant surveys identified the following themes: CBL sessions (1) stimulated relevant and beneficial discussion, (2) were perceived positively, (3) were negatively affected by other clinical commitments, (4) were enhanced by the presence of a faculty medical oncologist, (5) generated a safe space for collaborative learning, (6) were time-efficient and (7) provided self-study opportunities. A postgraduate, trainee-led CBL program in medical oncology is feasible and was well received at our centre. It offers a promising complement to traditional teaching in a rapidly evolving field where faculty oncologist-led educational opportunities may be limited. Future studies could focus on the potential for virtual implementation to allow for collaboration between centres, to the benefit of rural medical oncology trainees.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues.
Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care.
We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts.
Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited.
Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants.
Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.