Making Nursing Visible in General Practice: Responsible Action Research as an Approach to Developing Nurse-Sensitive Metrics.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nursing Inquiry Pub Date : 2026-07-01 DOI:10.1111/nin.70130
Orla Loftus Moran, Mary Casey
{"title":"Making Nursing Visible in General Practice: Responsible Action Research as an Approach to Developing Nurse-Sensitive Metrics.","authors":"Orla Loftus Moran, Mary Casey","doi":"10.1111/nin.70130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This critical discussion paper argues that the development of nurse-sensitive metrics in general practice is not simply a technical task of selecting indicators, but an ethical and methodological process through which nursing contribution becomes known, named and represented. Although health systems increasingly prioritise measurement, accountability and performance data, important dimensions of nursing practice remain poorly captured, particularly in community and primary care contexts. In general practice, nursing care is characterised by generalist, relational, preventive and cumulative forms of care, making the direct transfer of metrics developed outside this context problematic. General practice nurses represent a substantial workforce, yet their contribution remains only partially visible within existing healthcare data systems. This paper advances a Responsible Action Research approach to developing nurse-sensitive metrics grounded in everyday practice. Drawing on Action Research, implemented through Appreciative Inquiry and informed by the Quality Action Research Checklist, the paper considers how collaborative inquiry can support general practice nurses to articulate dimensions of nursing quality that may otherwise remain tacit. Inclusion of perspectives from general practitioners, patients and practice administrators further situates this inquiry within the broader ecology of care. The paper argues that responsible metric development requires attention not only to what is eventually measured, but to the transparency, reflexivity and accountability of the process through which potential indicators are generated. By reframing metric development as a practice-engaged process of knowledge generation, it offers a methodological contribution to debates on how nursing work can be made visible without reducing its complexity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49727,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Inquiry","volume":"33 3","pages":"e70130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13310549/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nin.70130","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This critical discussion paper argues that the development of nurse-sensitive metrics in general practice is not simply a technical task of selecting indicators, but an ethical and methodological process through which nursing contribution becomes known, named and represented. Although health systems increasingly prioritise measurement, accountability and performance data, important dimensions of nursing practice remain poorly captured, particularly in community and primary care contexts. In general practice, nursing care is characterised by generalist, relational, preventive and cumulative forms of care, making the direct transfer of metrics developed outside this context problematic. General practice nurses represent a substantial workforce, yet their contribution remains only partially visible within existing healthcare data systems. This paper advances a Responsible Action Research approach to developing nurse-sensitive metrics grounded in everyday practice. Drawing on Action Research, implemented through Appreciative Inquiry and informed by the Quality Action Research Checklist, the paper considers how collaborative inquiry can support general practice nurses to articulate dimensions of nursing quality that may otherwise remain tacit. Inclusion of perspectives from general practitioners, patients and practice administrators further situates this inquiry within the broader ecology of care. The paper argues that responsible metric development requires attention not only to what is eventually measured, but to the transparency, reflexivity and accountability of the process through which potential indicators are generated. By reframing metric development as a practice-engaged process of knowledge generation, it offers a methodological contribution to debates on how nursing work can be made visible without reducing its complexity.

使护理在全科实践中可见:负责任的行动研究作为开发护士敏感指标的方法。
这篇重要的讨论论文认为,在全科实践中制定护士敏感指标不仅仅是选择指标的技术任务,而是一个道德和方法过程,通过这个过程,护理的贡献被认识、命名和代表。尽管卫生系统越来越重视测量、问责制和绩效数据,但护理实践的重要方面仍然缺乏把握,特别是在社区和初级保健环境中。在一般实践中,护理的特点是通才、关系、预防和累积形式的护理,这使得在这种背景之外开发的指标的直接转移成为问题。全科护士代表了一个庞大的劳动力队伍,但他们的贡献在现有的医疗保健数据系统中仍然只是部分可见。本文提出了一种负责任的行动研究方法,以开发基于日常实践的护士敏感指标。利用行动研究,通过赞赏式调查实施,并由质量行动研究清单提供信息,本文考虑了协作式调查如何支持全科护士阐明护理质量的各个维度,否则这些维度可能会保持沉默。纳入全科医生,患者和实践管理人员的观点进一步将这一调查置于更广泛的护理生态中。本文认为,负责任的度量标准开发不仅需要关注最终测量的内容,还需要关注产生潜在指标的过程的透明度、反身性和问责性。通过将度量发展重新定义为一个实践参与的知识生成过程,它为关于如何在不降低其复杂性的情况下使护理工作可见的辩论提供了方法论贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Inquiry
Nursing Inquiry 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Inquiry aims to stimulate examination of nursing''s current and emerging practices, conditions and contexts within an expanding international community of ideas. The journal aspires to excite thinking and stimulate action toward a preferred future for health and healthcare by encouraging critical reflection and lively debate on matters affecting and influenced by nursing from a range of disciplinary angles, scientific perspectives, analytic approaches, social locations and philosophical positions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书