Mental health professional graduate and postgraduate training in disability.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Kelly E Ferreira, Owen Vegas, William J Smith, Tara M Lutz
{"title":"Mental health professional graduate and postgraduate training in disability.","authors":"Kelly E Ferreira, Owen Vegas, William J Smith, Tara M Lutz","doi":"10.1037/rep0000688","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective: </strong>People with disabilities (PWD) are nearly five times more likely to experience mental distress than people without disabilities. Despite this elevated risk, many mental health professionals report feeling unprepared to work with PWD, possibly due to limited disability-focused training. The objective of the current study was to assess disability-focused content in graduate and postgraduate training programs for psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, and counselors.</p><p><strong>Research method/design: </strong>An online survey was distributed (September 2024 through October 2025) to directors and faculty of graduate and postgraduate psychology, counseling, social work, and psychiatry programs in the United States. Director and faculty participants (<i>N</i> = 191) reported on the presence and amount of coursework/training to diagnose, assess, and treat psychiatric disorders among PWD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 45% of participants reported little to no instruction on diagnosing psychiatric disorders in PWD, and 42% reported little to no training in conducting mental health assessments with PWD. Half of the participants indicated minimal or no training in psychotherapeutic interventions for PWD or communicating about mental health with PWD. Only 11% rated their program as excellent in preparing future clinicians to work with PWD. Regression analyses showed that both the presence (<i>p</i> < .001) and amount (<i>p</i> < .001) of disability-focused content significantly predicted perceived student preparedness to work with PWD. A sensitivity analysis excluding potentially duplicate responses confirmed the robustness of these findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion/implication: </strong>Findings highlight substantial gaps in disability-focused training within mental health programs and suggest that increasing disability-focused content may enhance faculty-perceived clinician preparedness to work with PWD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":47974,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000688","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objective: People with disabilities (PWD) are nearly five times more likely to experience mental distress than people without disabilities. Despite this elevated risk, many mental health professionals report feeling unprepared to work with PWD, possibly due to limited disability-focused training. The objective of the current study was to assess disability-focused content in graduate and postgraduate training programs for psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, and counselors.

Research method/design: An online survey was distributed (September 2024 through October 2025) to directors and faculty of graduate and postgraduate psychology, counseling, social work, and psychiatry programs in the United States. Director and faculty participants (N = 191) reported on the presence and amount of coursework/training to diagnose, assess, and treat psychiatric disorders among PWD.

Results: Approximately 45% of participants reported little to no instruction on diagnosing psychiatric disorders in PWD, and 42% reported little to no training in conducting mental health assessments with PWD. Half of the participants indicated minimal or no training in psychotherapeutic interventions for PWD or communicating about mental health with PWD. Only 11% rated their program as excellent in preparing future clinicians to work with PWD. Regression analyses showed that both the presence (p < .001) and amount (p < .001) of disability-focused content significantly predicted perceived student preparedness to work with PWD. A sensitivity analysis excluding potentially duplicate responses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

Conclusion/implication: Findings highlight substantial gaps in disability-focused training within mental health programs and suggest that increasing disability-focused content may enhance faculty-perceived clinician preparedness to work with PWD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

心理健康专业毕业生和残疾方面的研究生培训。
目的/目标:残疾人(PWD)经历精神痛苦的可能性几乎是正常人的五倍。尽管存在这种风险,但许多精神卫生专业人员报告说,他们对与残疾人一起工作感到措手不及,这可能是由于残疾人培训有限。本研究的目的是评估心理学家、精神病学家、社会工作者和咨询师的研究生和研究生培训计划中以残疾为重点的内容。研究方法/设计:一项在线调查(2024年9月至2025年10月)被分发给美国研究生和研究生心理学、咨询、社会工作和精神病学项目的主任和教师。主任和教师参与者(N = 191)报告了诊断、评估和治疗PWD中精神疾病的课程/培训的存在和数量。结果:大约45%的参与者报告在诊断PWD的精神障碍方面几乎没有指导,42%的参与者报告在进行PWD的精神健康评估方面几乎没有培训。一半的参与者表示,在残疾人士的心理治疗干预或与残疾人士沟通心理健康方面,他们接受了很少或没有接受过培训。只有11%的人认为他们的项目在培养未来的临床医生治疗PWD方面表现出色。回归分析显示,以残疾为重点的内容的存在(p < 0.001)和数量(p < 0.001)显著预测了学生对残疾障碍工作的准备程度。排除潜在重复反应的敏感性分析证实了这些发现的稳健性。结论/含义:研究结果强调了心理健康项目中以残疾为重点的培训存在的实质性差距,并建议增加以残疾为重点的内容可以提高教师对临床医生与残疾人士合作的准备程度。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Psychology is a quarterly peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles in furtherance of the mission of Division 22 (Rehabilitation Psychology) of the American Psychological Association and to advance the science and practice of rehabilitation psychology. Rehabilitation psychologists consider the entire network of biological, psychological, social, environmental, and political factors that affect the functioning of persons with disabilities or chronic illness. Given the breadth of rehabilitation psychology, the journal"s scope is broadly defined.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书