Psychometric Evaluation of the Japanese Version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture 2.0 (J-HSOPS 2.0): A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yosuke Hatakeyama, Kanako Seto, Ryo Onishi, Ryosuke Hayashi, Kunichika Matsumoto, Tomonori Hasegawa
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of the Japanese Version of the Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture 2.0 (J-HSOPS 2.0): A Nationwide Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Yosuke Hatakeyama, Kanako Seto, Ryo Onishi, Ryosuke Hayashi, Kunichika Matsumoto, Tomonori Hasegawa","doi":"10.1097/PTS.0000000000001549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Patient safety culture is a key determinant of health care quality and safety outcomes. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) is one of the most widely used instruments for assessing safety culture in healthcare organizations. Although the revised HSOPS 2.0 has been adopted internationally, the Japanese version (J-HSOPS 2.0) has not yet been comprehensively evaluated using large-scale empirical data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional survey of health care professionals in hospitals participating in a nationwide patient safety culture benchmarking program in Japan. The J-HSOPS 2.0 was developed through a structured translation and adaptation process. Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis based on the original 10-dimensional HSOPS 2.0 model. Model fit was evaluated using standard goodness-of-fit indices. Convergent validity and reliability were assessed using average variance extracted, composite reliability, and Cronbach alpha, while discriminant validity was examined using factor correlations and the Fornell-Larcker criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 76,966 hospital staff members were analyzed. The hypothesized 10-factor structure was broadly supported. Model fit indices indicated acceptable but suboptimal fit (RMSEA=0.067; CFI=0.836). Measurement invariance across professional groups was largely supported. Communication-related dimensions showed relatively strong psychometric performance and were strongly associated with overall patient safety ratings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The J-HSOPS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties and can be used for benchmarking and quality improvement in Japanese hospitals. These findings support the use of J-HSOPS 2.0 as a practical tool for identifying patient safety risks and guiding safety improvement initiatives in hospital settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000001549","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Patient safety culture is a key determinant of health care quality and safety outcomes. The Hospital Survey on Patient Safety Culture (HSOPS) is one of the most widely used instruments for assessing safety culture in healthcare organizations. Although the revised HSOPS 2.0 has been adopted internationally, the Japanese version (J-HSOPS 2.0) has not yet been comprehensively evaluated using large-scale empirical data.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of health care professionals in hospitals participating in a nationwide patient safety culture benchmarking program in Japan. The J-HSOPS 2.0 was developed through a structured translation and adaptation process. Construct validity was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis based on the original 10-dimensional HSOPS 2.0 model. Model fit was evaluated using standard goodness-of-fit indices. Convergent validity and reliability were assessed using average variance extracted, composite reliability, and Cronbach alpha, while discriminant validity was examined using factor correlations and the Fornell-Larcker criterion.

Results: Data from 76,966 hospital staff members were analyzed. The hypothesized 10-factor structure was broadly supported. Model fit indices indicated acceptable but suboptimal fit (RMSEA=0.067; CFI=0.836). Measurement invariance across professional groups was largely supported. Communication-related dimensions showed relatively strong psychometric performance and were strongly associated with overall patient safety ratings.

Conclusions: The J-HSOPS 2.0 demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties and can be used for benchmarking and quality improvement in Japanese hospitals. These findings support the use of J-HSOPS 2.0 as a practical tool for identifying patient safety risks and guiding safety improvement initiatives in hospital settings.

日本版医院患者安全文化调查2.0 (j - hsop 2.0)的心理测量学评价:一项全国性的横断面研究。
目标:患者安全文化是医疗保健质量和安全结果的关键决定因素。医院患者安全文化调查(hops)是评估医疗机构安全文化最广泛使用的工具之一。虽然修订后的hops 2.0已被国际上采用,但日本版(j - hops 2.0)尚未得到大规模实证数据的全面评价。方法:我们对参加日本全国患者安全文化基准计划的医院的卫生保健专业人员进行了横断面调查。j - hsop 2.0是通过结构化的翻译和改编过程开发的。在原10维hhsops 2.0模型的基础上,采用验证性因子分析评估结构效度。使用标准拟合优度指数评估模型拟合。采用平均方差提取、复合信度和Cronbach alpha来评估收敛效度和信度,而采用因子相关性和Fornell-Larcker标准来检验判别效度。结果:分析了76,966名医院工作人员的数据。假设的10因素结构得到了广泛支持。模型拟合指标为可接受但次优(RMSEA=0.067; CFI=0.836)。在很大程度上支持跨专业群体的测量不变性。与沟通相关的维度显示出相对较强的心理测量表现,并与总体患者安全评级密切相关。结论:j - hsop 2.0具有良好的心理测量性能,可用于日本医院的对标和质量改进。这些发现支持使用j - hsop 2.0作为识别患者安全风险和指导医院环境安全改进举措的实用工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Safety
Journal of Patient Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.60%
发文量
302
期刊介绍: Journal of Patient Safety (ISSN 1549-8417; online ISSN 1549-8425) is dedicated to presenting research advances and field applications in every area of patient safety. While Journal of Patient Safety has a research emphasis, it also publishes articles describing near-miss opportunities, system modifications that are barriers to error, and the impact of regulatory changes on healthcare delivery. This mix of research and real-world findings makes Journal of Patient Safety a valuable resource across the breadth of health professions and from bench to bedside.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书