Eosinophilia in the Tropics: Should Empirical Anthelmintic Treatment Be Considered Standard Practice? A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tropical Medicine & International Health Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-28 DOI:10.1111/tmi.70191
Smith Kungwankiattichai, Patsharaporn T Sarasombath, Pattaraporn Tunsing, Weerapat Owattanapanich
{"title":"Eosinophilia in the Tropics: Should Empirical Anthelmintic Treatment Be Considered Standard Practice? A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Smith Kungwankiattichai, Patsharaporn T Sarasombath, Pattaraporn Tunsing, Weerapat Owattanapanich","doi":"10.1111/tmi.70191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Eosinophilia is a common clinical finding with diverse etiologies. Helminthiasis is a major aetiology in tropical regions, but data from haematology consultation services at tertiary centres in endemic settings are limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the prevalence of helminthiasis among patients with eosinophilia at a tropical tertiary care centre and identify clinical and laboratory characteristics differentiating helminth from non-helminth etiologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study with predefined retrospective outcome classification was conducted at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand (January 2022 to November 2023) in adult patients with blood eosinophilia above 500 cells/μL. All patients underwent helminth screening through stool examination and serological testing for strongyloidiasis, gnathostomiasis, angiostrongyliasis, filariasis and cysticercosis, and received empirical ivermectin or albendazole with monthly follow-up for 6 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 131 patients, 76 (58.0%) were diagnosed with helminthiasis, comprising 49 definite (laboratory-confirmed) and 27 probable (treatment-response-defined) infections. Strongyloidiasis (53.1%) was most common among definite infections, followed by gnathostomiasis (40.8%) and cysticercosis (26.5%), with multiple infections in 24.5% of definite cases. The median time to absolute eosinophil count (AEC) normalization was 1.0 month (IQR: 1.0-2.0), with 93.4% normalizing within 3 months. Probable infections were significantly associated with soil contact and forest travel (all p < 0.05), while definite infections were associated with organism-specific exposures (all p < 0.05). Patients aged 75 years or above showed significantly lower AEC at presentation (adjusted geometric mean ratio 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31-0.89, p = 0.017). Leukopenia and hypoalbuminemia were more prevalent in non-infectious etiologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Helminthiasis was identified in more than half of patients with eosinophilia at a tropical tertiary haematology service. Empirical anthelmintic therapy effectively normalized eosinophilia in the majority within 3 months, supporting its use as a standard initial approach in endemic settings. Detailed exposure anamnesis and concurrent evaluation for non-helminth etiologies, particularly in patients with leukopenia or hypoalbuminemia, should be routinely performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":23962,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","volume":" ","pages":"1433-1442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13628429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine & International Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tmi.70191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Eosinophilia is a common clinical finding with diverse etiologies. Helminthiasis is a major aetiology in tropical regions, but data from haematology consultation services at tertiary centres in endemic settings are limited.

Objectives: To determine the prevalence of helminthiasis among patients with eosinophilia at a tropical tertiary care centre and identify clinical and laboratory characteristics differentiating helminth from non-helminth etiologies.

Methods: A prospective cohort study with predefined retrospective outcome classification was conducted at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand (January 2022 to November 2023) in adult patients with blood eosinophilia above 500 cells/μL. All patients underwent helminth screening through stool examination and serological testing for strongyloidiasis, gnathostomiasis, angiostrongyliasis, filariasis and cysticercosis, and received empirical ivermectin or albendazole with monthly follow-up for 6 months.

Results: Among 131 patients, 76 (58.0%) were diagnosed with helminthiasis, comprising 49 definite (laboratory-confirmed) and 27 probable (treatment-response-defined) infections. Strongyloidiasis (53.1%) was most common among definite infections, followed by gnathostomiasis (40.8%) and cysticercosis (26.5%), with multiple infections in 24.5% of definite cases. The median time to absolute eosinophil count (AEC) normalization was 1.0 month (IQR: 1.0-2.0), with 93.4% normalizing within 3 months. Probable infections were significantly associated with soil contact and forest travel (all p < 0.05), while definite infections were associated with organism-specific exposures (all p < 0.05). Patients aged 75 years or above showed significantly lower AEC at presentation (adjusted geometric mean ratio 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31-0.89, p = 0.017). Leukopenia and hypoalbuminemia were more prevalent in non-infectious etiologies.

Conclusions: Helminthiasis was identified in more than half of patients with eosinophilia at a tropical tertiary haematology service. Empirical anthelmintic therapy effectively normalized eosinophilia in the majority within 3 months, supporting its use as a standard initial approach in endemic settings. Detailed exposure anamnesis and concurrent evaluation for non-helminth etiologies, particularly in patients with leukopenia or hypoalbuminemia, should be routinely performed.

热带嗜酸性粒细胞增多症:经验驱虫药治疗应被视为标准做法吗?前瞻性队列研究。
背景:嗜酸性粒细胞增多症是一种常见的临床表现,病因多样。蛔虫病是热带地区的一种主要病因,但来自流行地区三级中心血液病咨询服务的数据有限。目的:确定热带三级保健中心嗜酸性粒细胞增多症患者中寄生虫病的患病率,并确定区分寄生虫与非寄生虫病因的临床和实验室特征。方法:在泰国Siriraj医院(2022年1月至2023年11月)对血嗜酸性粒细胞高于500细胞/μL的成年患者进行前瞻性队列研究,预先设定回顾性结果分类。所有患者均通过粪便检查及圆线虫病、颌口病、血管圆线虫病、丝虫病和囊虫病血清学检查进行寄生虫筛查,并给予经验性伊维菌素或阿苯达唑治疗,每月随访6个月。结果:131例患者中,76例(58.0%)被诊断为寄生虫病,其中49例确诊(实验室确诊),27例可能(治疗反应定义)感染。确诊病例中以类圆线虫病(53.1%)最为常见,其次为齿口病(40.8%)和囊虫病(26.5%),其中多次感染占24.5%。绝对嗜酸性粒细胞计数(AEC)恢复正常的中位时间为1.0个月(IQR: 1.0-2.0), 93.4%的患者在3个月内恢复正常。可能的感染与土壤接触和森林旅行显著相关(结论:在热带三级血液学服务中心,半数以上的嗜酸性粒细胞增多患者被发现有寄生虫病。经验性驱虫药治疗在3个月内有效地使大多数嗜酸性粒细胞正常化,支持将其作为流行环境中的标准初始方法使用。对于非蠕虫病因,特别是白细胞减少或低白蛋白血症患者,应常规进行详细的暴露记忆和同时评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Tropical Medicine & International Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Tropical Medicine & International Health is published on behalf of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Foundation Tropical Medicine and International Health, Belgian Institute of Tropical Medicine and Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine. Tropical Medicine & International Health is the official journal of the Federation of European Societies for Tropical Medicine and International Health (FESTMIH).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书