Anand A Joshi, Sophia X Cui, Chin-Cheng Chan, Hao-Ting Kung, Jonas T Kaplan, Krishna S Nayak, Richard M Leahy, Justin P Haldar
{"title":"An evaluation of brain volume and cortical thickness measurement at 0.55 T.","authors":"Anand A Joshi, Sophia X Cui, Chin-Cheng Chan, Hao-Ting Kung, Jonas T Kaplan, Krishna S Nayak, Richard M Leahy, Justin P Haldar","doi":"10.1007/s10334-026-01380-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the feasibility of anatomical neuroimaging studies using 0.55 T MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MPRAGE images with 1 mm isotropic resolution were acquired from a cohort of five healthy subjects using both 0.55 T and 3 T scanners, including repeat scans of each subject at each field strength. The 0.55 T images were denoised to mitigate the effects of high resolution and low-field strength. All scans were analyzed using BrainSuite and FreeSurfer image analysis software, which performs operations including tissue classification, region segmentation/labeling, and thickness/volume measurements for different brain regions. Regional cortical thickness measurements and regional brain volume measurements were compared, and test-retest repeatability at each field strength was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both image analysis software tools, we observed reasonably good correlations between field strengths for cortical thickness measures and regional brain volume measures. Test-retest repeatability analysis suggests that experimental variability was generally higher at 0.55 T than at 3 T, although the amount of difference was dependent on the specific measure being considered and the software tool that was used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While our sample size was small which limits the strength of the conclusions we can draw, this small-scale pilot study suggests the potential feasibility of certain types of anatomical neuroimaging studies at 0.55 T (especially those involving volume measurements), assuming that appropriate adjustments are made to account for increased experimental variability at this field strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-026-01380-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the feasibility of anatomical neuroimaging studies using 0.55 T MRI.
Methods: MPRAGE images with 1 mm isotropic resolution were acquired from a cohort of five healthy subjects using both 0.55 T and 3 T scanners, including repeat scans of each subject at each field strength. The 0.55 T images were denoised to mitigate the effects of high resolution and low-field strength. All scans were analyzed using BrainSuite and FreeSurfer image analysis software, which performs operations including tissue classification, region segmentation/labeling, and thickness/volume measurements for different brain regions. Regional cortical thickness measurements and regional brain volume measurements were compared, and test-retest repeatability at each field strength was evaluated.
Results: For both image analysis software tools, we observed reasonably good correlations between field strengths for cortical thickness measures and regional brain volume measures. Test-retest repeatability analysis suggests that experimental variability was generally higher at 0.55 T than at 3 T, although the amount of difference was dependent on the specific measure being considered and the software tool that was used.
Conclusion: While our sample size was small which limits the strength of the conclusions we can draw, this small-scale pilot study suggests the potential feasibility of certain types of anatomical neuroimaging studies at 0.55 T (especially those involving volume measurements), assuming that appropriate adjustments are made to account for increased experimental variability at this field strength.
期刊介绍:
MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include:
advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology,
new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine,
study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance,
reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.