An evaluation of brain volume and cortical thickness measurement at 0.55 T.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Anand A Joshi, Sophia X Cui, Chin-Cheng Chan, Hao-Ting Kung, Jonas T Kaplan, Krishna S Nayak, Richard M Leahy, Justin P Haldar
{"title":"An evaluation of brain volume and cortical thickness measurement at 0.55 T.","authors":"Anand A Joshi, Sophia X Cui, Chin-Cheng Chan, Hao-Ting Kung, Jonas T Kaplan, Krishna S Nayak, Richard M Leahy, Justin P Haldar","doi":"10.1007/s10334-026-01380-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the feasibility of anatomical neuroimaging studies using 0.55 T MRI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MPRAGE images with 1 mm isotropic resolution were acquired from a cohort of five healthy subjects using both 0.55 T and 3 T scanners, including repeat scans of each subject at each field strength. The 0.55 T images were denoised to mitigate the effects of high resolution and low-field strength. All scans were analyzed using BrainSuite and FreeSurfer image analysis software, which performs operations including tissue classification, region segmentation/labeling, and thickness/volume measurements for different brain regions. Regional cortical thickness measurements and regional brain volume measurements were compared, and test-retest repeatability at each field strength was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both image analysis software tools, we observed reasonably good correlations between field strengths for cortical thickness measures and regional brain volume measures. Test-retest repeatability analysis suggests that experimental variability was generally higher at 0.55 T than at 3 T, although the amount of difference was dependent on the specific measure being considered and the software tool that was used.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While our sample size was small which limits the strength of the conclusions we can draw, this small-scale pilot study suggests the potential feasibility of certain types of anatomical neuroimaging studies at 0.55 T (especially those involving volume measurements), assuming that appropriate adjustments are made to account for increased experimental variability at this field strength.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-026-01380-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the feasibility of anatomical neuroimaging studies using 0.55 T MRI.

Methods: MPRAGE images with 1 mm isotropic resolution were acquired from a cohort of five healthy subjects using both 0.55 T and 3 T scanners, including repeat scans of each subject at each field strength. The 0.55 T images were denoised to mitigate the effects of high resolution and low-field strength. All scans were analyzed using BrainSuite and FreeSurfer image analysis software, which performs operations including tissue classification, region segmentation/labeling, and thickness/volume measurements for different brain regions. Regional cortical thickness measurements and regional brain volume measurements were compared, and test-retest repeatability at each field strength was evaluated.

Results: For both image analysis software tools, we observed reasonably good correlations between field strengths for cortical thickness measures and regional brain volume measures. Test-retest repeatability analysis suggests that experimental variability was generally higher at 0.55 T than at 3 T, although the amount of difference was dependent on the specific measure being considered and the software tool that was used.

Conclusion: While our sample size was small which limits the strength of the conclusions we can draw, this small-scale pilot study suggests the potential feasibility of certain types of anatomical neuroimaging studies at 0.55 T (especially those involving volume measurements), assuming that appropriate adjustments are made to account for increased experimental variability at this field strength.

0.55 T时脑容量和皮质厚度测量的评价。
目的:探讨应用0.55 T MRI进行解剖神经影像学研究的可行性。方法:使用0.55 T和3t扫描仪从5名健康受试者队列中获得1 mm各向同性分辨率的MPRAGE图像,包括在每种场强下对每个受试者进行重复扫描。对0.55 T图像进行去噪处理,以减轻高分辨率和低场强的影响。所有扫描结果都使用BrainSuite和FreeSurfer图像分析软件进行分析,该软件执行的操作包括组织分类、区域分割/标记以及不同大脑区域的厚度/体积测量。比较区域皮质厚度测量值和区域脑容量测量值,并评估每种场强下的重测重复性。结果:对于这两种图像分析软件工具,我们观察到皮层厚度测量和区域脑容量测量的场强之间存在相当好的相关性。测试-重测可重复性分析表明,实验变异性在0.55 T时通常高于3 T,尽管差异的大小取决于所考虑的具体测量和使用的软件工具。结论:虽然我们的样本量很小,这限制了我们可以得出的结论的强度,但这项小规模的试点研究表明,在0.55 T下进行某些类型的解剖神经成像研究(特别是那些涉及体积测量的研究)的潜在可行性,假设在该场强下进行适当的调整以考虑增加的实验可变性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include: advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology, new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine, study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance, reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书