Second-Generation Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: A Comprehensive Assessment of Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment Pub Date : 2026-06-20 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2147/NDT.S606817
Petru Ifteni, Paula-Simina Petric, Andreea Violeta Popa, Andreea Teodorescu, Radu Georgescu, Mihnea Costin Manea
{"title":"Second-Generation Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: A Comprehensive Assessment of Effectiveness, Safety, and Cost.","authors":"Petru Ifteni, Paula-Simina Petric, Andreea Violeta Popa, Andreea Teodorescu, Radu Georgescu, Mihnea Costin Manea","doi":"10.2147/NDT.S606817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics (SG-LAIs) improve adherence, reduce relapse, and enhance outcomes in schizophrenia, yet remain underused. In Romania, data on psychiatrists' views is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess Romanian psychiatrists' attitudes and prescribing behaviors regarding SG-LAIs, and identify key drivers and barriers to their use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey among psychiatrists in urban hospital, outpatient, and private settings, treating more than 1,000 patients with schizophrenia. The survey rated the four SG-LAIs available in Romania (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, and risperidone) on efficacy, tolerability, dosing flexibility, monitoring needs, prescribing frequency, and perceived obstacles/facilitators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>80 psychiatrists participated. Aripiprazole LAI received the most favorable ratings, ranking highest for efficacy, safety, patient functioning, ease of administration, guideline alignment, side-effect profile, monitoring requirements, and overall preference. Paliperidone and risperidone were also positively evaluated for dosing versatility, whereas olanzapine generally scored lowest. Main factors encouraging LAI prescription were improved adherence (96.3%) and reduced relapse risk (96.3%), followed by a favorable clinical profile (66.3%). Key barriers included lack of patient trust (57.5%), lack of hospital supply (43.8%), absence of LAI formulations for certain antipsychotics (43.8%), and limited experience (36.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Romanian psychiatrists show a strong preference for aripiprazole LAI, with decisions driven mainly by clinical benefits. Reducing patient concerns and system-level limitations-especially availability, indications, and communication- may support increased use of SG-LAIs in everyday clinical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19378,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment","volume":"22 ","pages":"606817"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13295001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S606817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Second-generation long-acting injectable antipsychotics (SG-LAIs) improve adherence, reduce relapse, and enhance outcomes in schizophrenia, yet remain underused. In Romania, data on psychiatrists' views is limited.

Objective: To assess Romanian psychiatrists' attitudes and prescribing behaviors regarding SG-LAIs, and identify key drivers and barriers to their use.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey among psychiatrists in urban hospital, outpatient, and private settings, treating more than 1,000 patients with schizophrenia. The survey rated the four SG-LAIs available in Romania (aripiprazole, olanzapine, paliperidone, and risperidone) on efficacy, tolerability, dosing flexibility, monitoring needs, prescribing frequency, and perceived obstacles/facilitators.

Results: 80 psychiatrists participated. Aripiprazole LAI received the most favorable ratings, ranking highest for efficacy, safety, patient functioning, ease of administration, guideline alignment, side-effect profile, monitoring requirements, and overall preference. Paliperidone and risperidone were also positively evaluated for dosing versatility, whereas olanzapine generally scored lowest. Main factors encouraging LAI prescription were improved adherence (96.3%) and reduced relapse risk (96.3%), followed by a favorable clinical profile (66.3%). Key barriers included lack of patient trust (57.5%), lack of hospital supply (43.8%), absence of LAI formulations for certain antipsychotics (43.8%), and limited experience (36.3%).

Conclusion: Romanian psychiatrists show a strong preference for aripiprazole LAI, with decisions driven mainly by clinical benefits. Reducing patient concerns and system-level limitations-especially availability, indications, and communication- may support increased use of SG-LAIs in everyday clinical care.

第二代长效注射抗精神病药物:有效性、安全性和成本的综合评估。
背景:第二代长效注射抗精神病药物(SG-LAIs)可改善精神分裂症患者的依从性、减少复发并改善预后,但仍未得到充分利用。在罗马尼亚,关于精神科医生观点的数据是有限的。目的:评估罗马尼亚精神科医生对SG-LAIs的态度和处方行为,并确定其使用的关键驱动因素和障碍。方法:我们对城市医院、门诊和私人机构的精神科医生进行了横断面问卷调查,治疗了1000多名精神分裂症患者。调查对罗马尼亚可用的四种SG-LAIs(阿立哌唑、奥氮平、帕利哌酮和利培酮)的疗效、耐受性、给药灵活性、监测需求、处方频率和感知障碍/促进因素进行了评分。结果:80名精神科医生参与。阿立哌唑LAI获得了最有利的评价,在疗效、安全性、患者功能、易于给药、指南一致性、副作用概况、监测要求和总体偏好方面排名最高。帕利哌酮和利培酮也被积极评价为剂量多功能性,而奥氮平通常得分最低。鼓励LAI处方的主要因素是改善依从性(96.3%)和降低复发风险(96.3%),其次是良好的临床表现(66.3%)。主要障碍包括缺乏患者信任(57.5%)、缺乏医院供应(43.8%)、缺乏某些抗精神病药物的LAI配方(43.8%)和经验有限(36.3%)。结论:罗马尼亚精神科医生对阿立哌唑LAI表现出强烈的偏好,其决策主要由临床效益驱动。减少患者的担忧和系统层面的限制——特别是可用性、适应症和沟通——可能支持在日常临床护理中增加SG-LAIs的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHIATRY
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
328
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal of clinical therapeutics and pharmacology focusing on concise rapid reporting of clinical or pre-clinical studies on a range of neuropsychiatric and neurological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书