Prospective policy analysis of healthcare workforce policies for effective non-communicable disease prevention and management in Meghalaya, India.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ankur Nair, Pratheeba John, Rajeev Sadanandan
{"title":"Prospective policy analysis of healthcare workforce policies for effective non-communicable disease prevention and management in Meghalaya, India.","authors":"Ankur Nair, Pratheeba John, Rajeev Sadanandan","doi":"10.1093/heapol/czaf107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study presents a prospective policy analysis of healthcare workforce (human resources for health, HRH) reforms in Meghalaya, India, a state facing dual challenges of a rising burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and persistent inequities in access to medical and public health specialists. Grounded in a health systems and social justice perspective, this study examines current HRH needs and proposed reforms, evaluating their potential to address the evolving health demands of the population, particularly among poor and marginalized groups vulnerable to NCDs. Using secondary evidence, including national surveys, epidemiological data, and government reports, the study maps workforce gaps, especially in rural and tribal regions, and highlights the physician-centric nature of HRH governance in India. The Walt and Gilson policy triangle, combined with adapted HRH evaluation frameworks, guided the analysis of policy context, content, processes, and actors. This approach identified key gaps in recruitment, rural retention, cadre structures, and specialist training for effective NCD prevention and management. A scenario analysis, using the Intuitive Logic method, developed a best-case trajectory of reform achievable through equity-oriented design, strong political will, and institutional capacity, while recognizing risks of policy stagnation. Findings indicate that achieving a socially accountable HRH system characterized by equitable distribution, transparent governance, and meaningful community engagement is critical for improving NCD outcomes and reducing health inequities, particularly by preventing financial distress among the poor. The study contributes to health policy and systems research by linking institutional design to future health system resilience, underscoring the need to embed justice, participation, and adaptability within HRH governance to effectively address present and future health challenges in low-resource contexts such as Meghalaya.</p>","PeriodicalId":12926,"journal":{"name":"Health policy and planning","volume":"41 Supplement_1","pages":"i58-i70"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13311667/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health policy and planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaf107","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents a prospective policy analysis of healthcare workforce (human resources for health, HRH) reforms in Meghalaya, India, a state facing dual challenges of a rising burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and persistent inequities in access to medical and public health specialists. Grounded in a health systems and social justice perspective, this study examines current HRH needs and proposed reforms, evaluating their potential to address the evolving health demands of the population, particularly among poor and marginalized groups vulnerable to NCDs. Using secondary evidence, including national surveys, epidemiological data, and government reports, the study maps workforce gaps, especially in rural and tribal regions, and highlights the physician-centric nature of HRH governance in India. The Walt and Gilson policy triangle, combined with adapted HRH evaluation frameworks, guided the analysis of policy context, content, processes, and actors. This approach identified key gaps in recruitment, rural retention, cadre structures, and specialist training for effective NCD prevention and management. A scenario analysis, using the Intuitive Logic method, developed a best-case trajectory of reform achievable through equity-oriented design, strong political will, and institutional capacity, while recognizing risks of policy stagnation. Findings indicate that achieving a socially accountable HRH system characterized by equitable distribution, transparent governance, and meaningful community engagement is critical for improving NCD outcomes and reducing health inequities, particularly by preventing financial distress among the poor. The study contributes to health policy and systems research by linking institutional design to future health system resilience, underscoring the need to embed justice, participation, and adaptability within HRH governance to effectively address present and future health challenges in low-resource contexts such as Meghalaya.

印度梅加拉亚邦有效预防和管理非传染性疾病的保健人力政策的前瞻性政策分析。
本研究对印度梅加拉亚邦的医疗保健人力资源(卫生人力资源,HRH)改革进行了前瞻性政策分析。印度梅加拉亚邦面临着非传染性疾病(NCDs)负担日益加重和在获得医疗和公共卫生专家服务方面持续存在不平等的双重挑战。本研究立足于卫生系统和社会正义的角度,审查了当前的卫生保健需求和拟议的改革,评估了其满足人口,特别是易受非传染性疾病影响的贫困和边缘化群体不断变化的卫生需求的潜力。该研究利用二手证据,包括全国调查、流行病学数据和政府报告,绘制了劳动力差距图,特别是在农村和部落地区,并强调了印度人力资源管理以医生为中心的本质。沃尔特和吉尔森的政策三角,结合改编后的人力资源评估框架,指导了对政策背景、内容、过程和行动者的分析。这种方法确定了在招聘、农村留用、干部结构以及有效预防和管理非传染性疾病的专业培训方面的主要差距。使用直观逻辑方法的情景分析,在认识到政策停滞风险的同时,制定了通过以公平为导向的设计、强大的政治意愿和制度能力实现改革的最佳案例轨迹。研究结果表明,实现一个以公平分配、透明治理和有意义的社区参与为特征的对社会负责的卫生保健系统,对于改善非传染性疾病结果和减少卫生不公平现象至关重要,特别是通过防止穷人的经济困境。该研究通过将制度设计与未来卫生系统恢复力联系起来,为卫生政策和系统研究做出了贡献,强调需要将正义、参与和适应性纳入卫生人力资源治理,以有效应对梅加拉亚邦等资源匮乏地区当前和未来的卫生挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health policy and planning
Health policy and planning 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Planning publishes health policy and systems research focusing on low- and middle-income countries. Our journal provides an international forum for publishing original and high-quality research that addresses questions pertinent to policy-makers, public health researchers and practitioners. Health Policy and Planning is published 10 times a year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书