Group education improves self-management of adrenal insufficiency in patients and their relative.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Anna-Karin Åkerman, Charlotte Höybye, Katarina Berinder, Maria Petersson, Tim Spelman, Jeanette Wahlberg, Per Dahlqvist, Sophie Bensing
{"title":"Group education improves self-management of adrenal insufficiency in patients and their relative.","authors":"Anna-Karin Åkerman, Charlotte Höybye, Katarina Berinder, Maria Petersson, Tim Spelman, Jeanette Wahlberg, Per Dahlqvist, Sophie Bensing","doi":"10.1530/EC-26-0121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Self-management and patient education are cornerstones in managing adrenal insufficiency (AI) to prevent adrenal crisis (AC). Glucocorticoid (GC) education group meetings are increasingly being incorporated into regular healthcare. However, few studies have evaluated its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This is a multicentre pre-post intervention study conducted at four university hospitals in Sweden between 2015 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 254 patients with AI along with 138 relatives were included. Participants attended a GC education group meeting led by an endocrinologist. Detailed guidance was provided on when and how to adjust GC doses to prevent AC together with instructions and supervised practice of hydrocortisone injections. Questionnaires on self-management were completed by both patients and relatives before the session and again 6 months later. In addition, patients also completed two HRQoL instruments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with AI felt relatively safe and informed about their GC treatment at baseline. However, many lacked adequate knowledge on dose adjustments, including high-risk situations for AC. At follow up, 194 patients (76.4%) and 94 relatives (68.1%) completed the questionnaires. Both patients and relatives showed significant improvements in perceived safety and management of high-risk scenarios for AC. However, some knowledge gaps persisted. The education effort did not result in significant changes in HRQoL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Structured GC education group meetings enhance the knowledge of patients and their relatives to manage AI safely. We consider this a valuable component of AI care.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>We highlight the value of repeating sick-day rules and using group education to improve self-management in patients with AI and their relatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":11634,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Connections","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13386157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Connections","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-26-0121","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Self-management and patient education are cornerstones in managing adrenal insufficiency (AI) to prevent adrenal crisis (AC). Glucocorticoid (GC) education group meetings are increasingly being incorporated into regular healthcare. However, few studies have evaluated its effectiveness.

Design: This is a multicentre pre-post intervention study conducted at four university hospitals in Sweden between 2015 and 2019.

Methods: A total of 254 patients with AI along with 138 relatives were included. Participants attended a GC education group meeting led by an endocrinologist. Detailed guidance was provided on when and how to adjust GC doses to prevent AC together with instructions and supervised practice of hydrocortisone injections. Questionnaires on self-management were completed by both patients and relatives before the session and again 6 months later. In addition, patients also completed two HRQoL instruments.

Results: Patients with AI felt relatively safe and informed about their GC treatment at baseline. However, many lacked adequate knowledge on dose adjustments, including high-risk situations for AC. At follow up, 194 patients (76.4%) and 94 relatives (68.1%) completed the questionnaires. Both patients and relatives showed significant improvements in perceived safety and management of high-risk scenarios for AC. However, some knowledge gaps persisted. The education effort did not result in significant changes in HRQoL.

Conclusion: Structured GC education group meetings enhance the knowledge of patients and their relatives to manage AI safely. We consider this a valuable component of AI care.

Significance: We highlight the value of repeating sick-day rules and using group education to improve self-management in patients with AI and their relatives.

团体教育提高患者及其亲属对肾上腺功能不全的自我管理。
目的:自我管理和患者教育是管理肾上腺功能不全(AI)、预防肾上腺危机(AC)的基础。糖皮质激素(GC)教育小组会议越来越多地被纳入常规保健。然而,很少有研究评估其有效性。设计:2015年至2019年在瑞典四所大学医院进行的多中心干预前后研究。方法:选取254例AI患者及其138名亲属。参加者参加了由内分泌专家主持的GC教育小组会议。提供了关于何时以及如何调整GC剂量以防止AC的详细指导,以及氢化可的松注射的说明和监督实践。患者和家属在治疗前和六个月后都完成了自我管理问卷。此外,患者还完成了两项HRQoL仪器。结果:AI患者感觉相对安全,并在基线时告知他们的GC治疗。然而,许多患者缺乏足够的剂量调整知识,包括AC的高危情况。在随访中,194名患者(76.4%)和94名亲属(68.1%)完成了问卷调查。患者和家属在认知安全性和管理高危情况方面都有显著改善。然而,一些知识差距仍然存在。教育工作没有导致HRQoL的显著变化。结论:有组织的人工智能教育小组会议提高了患者及其家属安全管理人工智能的知识。我们认为这是人工智能护理的重要组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Endocrine Connections
Endocrine Connections Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Endocrine Connections publishes original quality research and reviews in all areas of endocrinology, including papers that deal with non-classical tissues as source or targets of hormones and endocrine papers that have relevance to endocrine-related and intersecting disciplines and the wider biomedical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书