Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety: A Systematic Review of Enhancing Transparency and Regulatory Acceptance.

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Virendra S Gomase, Shenbagavel Vairachilai, Rupali Sharma, Suchita P Dhamane, Satish Sardana, Bijith Marakarkandy, Sandeep Kelkar
{"title":"Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety: A Systematic Review of Enhancing Transparency and Regulatory Acceptance.","authors":"Virendra S Gomase, Shenbagavel Vairachilai, Rupali Sharma, Suchita P Dhamane, Satish Sardana, Bijith Marakarkandy, Sandeep Kelkar","doi":"10.2174/0115748863467208260529094811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is rapidly transforming drug safety assessment by making complex AI models interpretable, transparent, and trustworthy for clinicians, healthcare regulators, and patients. This study emphasizes recent advances in the methodologies of XAI, including rule-based, post hoc, and hybrid models, and assesses the effectiveness of these approaches in pharmacovigilance and drug discovery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This paper evaluates the state-of-the-art techniques in XAI methods, such as methodbased or rule-based approaches, post-hoc explanation methods, and hybrid methods in general, used in drug safety and pharmaceutical-related research and applications. The role and treatment of explainability in AI in the EU AI Act and EU MDR regulations will also be discussed in this paper.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Integration of XAI into clinical prediction systems (CPS) evaluation will increase the level and quality of transparency and error identification, and clinician trust, although with a trade-off between interpretation and accuracy within prediction tasks. There is a shift towards greater focus on transparency and human evaluation mentioned within regulatory frameworks, although there is no standardization with respect to clinical prediction systems (CPS) evaluation and validation of XAI.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Emerging technologies emphasize the importance of clinician-centric design, personalized and causal inference-based explanations, and the integration of technical aspects and clinician feedback. Large research gaps are present in the standardization of evaluation criteria, ethical integration, and real-world clinically valid XAI systems.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In clinical applications associated with drug safety, emerging areas of research should be targeted towards collaborations, evaluations, and XAI design adaptable to meeting growing demands for operation, acceptability, and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":10777,"journal":{"name":"Current drug safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current drug safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748863467208260529094811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) is rapidly transforming drug safety assessment by making complex AI models interpretable, transparent, and trustworthy for clinicians, healthcare regulators, and patients. This study emphasizes recent advances in the methodologies of XAI, including rule-based, post hoc, and hybrid models, and assesses the effectiveness of these approaches in pharmacovigilance and drug discovery.

Method: This paper evaluates the state-of-the-art techniques in XAI methods, such as methodbased or rule-based approaches, post-hoc explanation methods, and hybrid methods in general, used in drug safety and pharmaceutical-related research and applications. The role and treatment of explainability in AI in the EU AI Act and EU MDR regulations will also be discussed in this paper.

Results: Integration of XAI into clinical prediction systems (CPS) evaluation will increase the level and quality of transparency and error identification, and clinician trust, although with a trade-off between interpretation and accuracy within prediction tasks. There is a shift towards greater focus on transparency and human evaluation mentioned within regulatory frameworks, although there is no standardization with respect to clinical prediction systems (CPS) evaluation and validation of XAI.

Discussion: Emerging technologies emphasize the importance of clinician-centric design, personalized and causal inference-based explanations, and the integration of technical aspects and clinician feedback. Large research gaps are present in the standardization of evaluation criteria, ethical integration, and real-world clinically valid XAI systems.

Conclusion: In clinical applications associated with drug safety, emerging areas of research should be targeted towards collaborations, evaluations, and XAI design adaptable to meeting growing demands for operation, acceptability, and patient safety.

可解释的人工智能在药物警戒和药物安全:提高透明度和监管接受度的系统回顾。
导读:可解释人工智能(XAI)通过使复杂的人工智能模型对临床医生、医疗监管机构和患者具有可解释性、透明度和可信赖性,正在迅速改变药物安全性评估。本研究强调了XAI方法的最新进展,包括基于规则的、事后的和混合模型,并评估了这些方法在药物警戒和药物发现方面的有效性。方法:本文评估了XAI方法中最先进的技术,如基于方法或基于规则的方法、事后解释方法和混合方法,这些方法通常用于药物安全和制药相关的研究和应用。本文还将讨论欧盟人工智能法案和欧盟MDR法规中人工智能可解释性的作用和处理。结果:将XAI集成到临床预测系统(CPS)评估中,将提高透明度和错误识别的水平和质量,以及临床医生的信任,尽管在预测任务中的解释和准确性之间存在权衡。尽管目前还没有关于XAI临床预测系统(CPS)评估和验证的标准化,但监管框架中提到的透明度和人的评估已转向更加关注。讨论:新兴技术强调以临床医生为中心的设计、个性化和基于因果推理的解释以及技术方面和临床医生反馈的整合的重要性。在评估标准的标准化、伦理整合和现实世界临床有效的XAI系统方面存在很大的研究差距。结论:在与药物安全相关的临床应用中,新兴研究领域应以协作、评估和XAI设计为目标,以适应日益增长的操作、可接受性和患者安全需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current drug safety
Current drug safety PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
期刊介绍: Current Drug Safety publishes frontier articles on all the latest advances on drug safety. The journal aims to publish the highest quality research articles, reviews and case reports in the field. Topics covered include: adverse effects of individual drugs and drug classes, management of adverse effects, pharmacovigilance and pharmacoepidemiology of new and existing drugs, post-marketing surveillance. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书